


















































Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Os melhores documentos à venda: Trabalhos de alunos formados
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Comunidade
Peça ajuda à comunidade e tire suas dúvidas relacionadas ao estudo
Descubra as melhores universidades em seu país de acordo com os usuários da Docsity
Guias grátis
Baixe gratuitamente nossos guias de estudo, métodos para diminuir a ansiedade, dicas de TCC preparadas pelos professores da Docsity
Soluções do livro "Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe"
Tipologia: Exercícios
1 / 58
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!
3.12 Infinite one-dimensional well................................ 54 3.13 Infinite two-dimensional well............................... 55 3.14 Matrices........................................... 56
A beam of neutrons of constant velocity, mass Mn(Mn ≈ 1. 67 x 10 −^27 kg) and energy E, is incident on a linear chain of atomic nuclei, arranged in a regular fashion as shown in the figure (these nuclei could be, for example, those of a long, linear molecule). We call l the distance between two consecutive nuclei, and d, their size (d l). A neutron detector D is placed far away, in a direction which makes an angle of θ with the direction of the incident neutrons.
Figure 1.1: Multiple-slit Experiment
From Complement DI , the fringe separation of the double-slit experi- ment is given by
λD l
. Using the Planck-Einstein relations(A-1), we know that as energy increases, the wavelength decreases. Thus, the distance between successive peaks decreases as well, so we end up seeing more peaks in a given area.
1.2 Bound State of a Particle in a ”Delta Function Poten-
tial”
Consider a particle whose Hamiltonian H [operator defined by formula (D-10) is:
2 m
d^2 dx^2
− αδ(x)
where α is a positive constant whose dimensions are to be found.
Nothing doing, let’s do as the question asks,
∫ (^)
−
H |φ〉 dx =
−
E |φ〉 dx
−
2 m
d^2 dx^2
φ(x) dx −
−
αδ(x)φ(x) dx = E
−
φ(x) dx
On the right, the integral disappears as → 0. The delta function only turns on if the integral includes x = 0, and it picks out that value in that integral,
2 m
dφ(x) dx
x=
x=−
− αφ(0) = 0
dφ(x) dx
x=
dφ(x) dx
x=−
2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2
As → 0, the left side would disappear unless there were a discontinuity. Since the right side is not equal to zero, there must be a discontinuity in the derivative of φ(x).
x < 0 φ(x) = A 1 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 exp(−ρx) x > 0 φ(x) = A 2 exp(ρx) + A′ 2 exp(−ρx)
Express the constant ρ in terms of E and m. Using the results of the preceding question, calculate the matrix M defined by:
( A 2 A′ 2
Then, using the condition that φ(x) must be square-integrable, find the possible values of the energy. Calculate the corresponding normalized wave functions. We can find ρ by using the Schrodinger equation(B-8),
2 m
d^2 dx^2
φ(x) = Eφ(x)
We only need to look at φ(x) at a single time, so lets look at the case x < 0,
2 m
(A 1 ρ^2 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 ρ^2 exp(−ρx)) = E(A 1 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 exp(−ρx))
ℏ^2 ρ^2 2 m
ρ^2 = −
2 mE ℏ^2 To calculate the required matrix, we use the discontinuity in the derivative,
dφ(x) dx
x=
dφ(x) dx
x=−
2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2
The first term we will need to use the x > 0 case and x < 0 for the second,
ρA 2 exp(ρ) − A′ 2 ρ exp(−ρ) − A 1 ρ exp(ρ) + A′ 1 ρ exp(−ρ) = −
2 mα ℏ^2
Note that we chose an arbitrary case for x = 0. Because φ(x) must be continuous, A 1 + A′ 1 = A 2 + A′ 2. Letting → 0, we have,
2 mα ρℏ^2
2 mα ρℏ^2
Using the continuity of the wavefunction,
2 mα ρℏ^2
2 mα ρℏ^2
1.3 Transmission of a ”delta function” potential barrier”
Consider a particle placed in the same potential as in the preceding exercise. The particle is now propagating from left to right along the x axis, with a positive energy E.
x < 0 φ(x) = exp(ikx) + A exp(−ikx) x > 0 φ(x) = B exp(ikx)
where k, A, and B are constants which are to be calculated in terms of the energy E,
of m and of α(watch out for the discontinuity in dφ dx
at x = 0. By observation, the given wavefunction is not dependant on time, and it follows the form given by (D-7), so it is a stationary state. To determine the constants, we can look at the Schrodinger equation(B-8),
−
2 m
d^2 dx^2 φ(x) − αδ(x)φ(x) = Eφ(x)
This holds true for all values of x, so let’s look at x > 0. The delta function term dies,
−
2 m
(−Bk^2 exp(ikx)) = EB exp(ikx)
ℏ^2 k^2 2 m
k^2 =
2 mE ℏ^2 At x = 0, we use the wavefunction continuity, B = 1 + A as well as the discontinuity in the first derivative, dφ(x) dx
x=
dφ(x) dx
x=−
2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2
ikB − ik(1 − A) = −
2 mαB ℏ^2
B(ikℏ^2 + 2mα) = ikℏ^2 (1 − A)
ikℏ^2 ikℏ^2 + mα
A = −
mα ikℏ^2 + mα
To find the reflection coefficient, we look at the parameters of incoming and outgoing particles. A particle moving to the right has magnitude 1, while a particle moving to the left has magnitude A,
m^2 α^2 k^2 ℏ^4 + m^2 α^2
m^2 α^2 m^2 α^2 (1 + E/EL)
Similarly, a particle moving to the right after passing through the barrier has magnitude B,
k^2 ℏ^4 k^2 ℏ^4 + m^2 α^2
We see that T + R = 1. As E → ∞, T → 1 and R → 0, which means the wavefunction has more and more energy to overcome the barrier. As energy increases, the probability that the particle will go through the barrier increases. At E = −EL, it has the same energy as the barrier, which is why we see that discontinuity. Classically, think of this as a ball hitting the top edge of a wall. Small variations around this point determine if the ball is reflected or transmitted.
We can reverse our Fourier transform to get φ(x),
φ(x) =
αφ(0) 2 πℏ
−∞
exp
ipx ℏ
(p^2 / 2 m − E) dp
φ(x) =
αφ(0)m ℏ
− 2 mE
exp
− 2 mE ℏ
x
To determine the allowed energy, let’s set x = 0 and match sides,
φ(0) =
αmφ(0) ℏ
− 2 mE
In order for this to hold true, αm ℏ
− 2 mE
α^2 m 2 ℏ^2
Ek =
2 m
−∞
p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp
Show that, when φ¯(p) is a ”sufficiently smooth” function, we also have:
Ek = −
2 m
−∞
φ∗(x)
d^2 φ dx^2
dx
These formulas enable us to obtain, in two different ways, the energy Ek for a particle in the bound state calculated in (a). What result is obtained? Note that, in this case φ(x) is not ”regular” at x = 0, where its derivative is discontinuous. It is then necessary to differentiate φ(x) in the sense of distributions, which introduces a contribution of the point x = 0 to the average value we are looking for. Interpret this contribution physically: consider a square well, centered at x = 0, whose width a approaches 0 and whose depth V 0 approaches infinity (so that aV 0 = α), and study the behaviour of the wave function in this well. Starting with the second equation and substituting in the definitions from Appendix I,
φ∗(x)
d^2 φ dx^2
2 πℏ
−∞
exp
ipx ℏ
φ^ ¯(p)
ipx ℏ
exp
ipx ℏ
dp
Ek =
4 mπℏ
−∞
−∞
p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp dx
The constants in front disappear when we integrate over all x,
Ek =
2 m
−∞
p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp
The bound states are given by
exp(−ρl) = ±
2 ρ μ
(i)Ground State. Show that this state is even (invariant with respect to reflection about the point x = l/ 2 ), and that its energy Es is less than the energy −EL introduced in problem 3. Interpret this result physically. Represent graphically the corresponding wave function.
1.6 Square Well Potential
Consider a square well potential of width a and depth V 0 (in this exercise, we shall use systematically the notation of 2-c-α of complement HI ). We intend to study the properties of the bound state of a particle in a well when its width a approaches zero.
|φn〉 are the eigenstates of a Hermitian operator H (H is, for example, the Hamilto- nian of an arbitrary physical system). Assume that the states |φn〉 form a discrete orthonormal basis. The operator U (m, n) is defined by:
U (m, n) = |φm〉 〈φn|
Using the definition of the adjoint,
U †(m, n) = |φn〉 〈φm|
Let’s act the commutator on a vector (looking ahead, we’ll set the vector as |φn〉,
[H, U ] |φn〉 = HU |φn〉 − U H |φn〉
= H |φm〉 〈φn|φn〉 − |φm〉 〈φn|H|φn〉
Since H has eigenkets φn and φm, i.e., { H |φm〉 = m |φm〉 H |φn〉 = n |φn〉
[H, U (m, n)] = m − n
U (m, n)U †(p, q) = δnq U (m, p)
Writing this out,
U (m, n)U †(p, q) = |φm〉 〈φn|φq 〉 〈φp|
The middle section dies unless n = q, leaving us the delta function,
= δnq |φm〉 〈φp|
U (m, n)U †(p, q) = δnq U (m, p)
By definition, the trace is given by
Tr U =
α
〈α|U |α〉
where α are the basis states.
=
α
〈α|φm〉 〈φn|α〉
Since |φn〉 form a basis, and since we sum over the basis states, at least one part dies unless m = n,
Tr U = δmn
m,n
AmnU (m, n)
Let’s start from the right side. Acting it on |φn〉, we only need to sum over m since we can use orthonormality for n, ∑
m,n
AmnU (m, n) |φn〉 =
m
〈φm|A|φn〉 |φm〉 〈φn|φn〉
Amn is a scalar, so we can move that around for free,
=
m
|φm〉 〈φm|A|φn〉
Performing the sum, the first part becomes identity, so we can remove it, ∑
m,n
AmnU (m, n) |φn〉 = A |φn〉