Docsity
Docsity

Prepare-se para as provas
Prepare-se para as provas

Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity


Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos para baixar

Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium


Guias e Dicas
Guias e Dicas

Solutions to Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe, Exercícios de Mecânica Quântica

Soluções do livro "Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe"

Tipologia: Exercícios

2024

Compartilhado em 11/12/2024

caroliny-fernandes-de-carvalho
caroliny-fernandes-de-carvalho 🇧🇷

2 documentos

1 / 58

Toggle sidebar

Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização

Não perca as partes importantes!

bg1
Solutions to Quantum Mechanics by Claude
Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe
Benjamin D. Suh
September 21, 2020
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a

Pré-visualização parcial do texto

Baixe Solutions to Quantum Mechanics by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe e outras Exercícios em PDF para Mecânica Quântica, somente na Docsity!

Solutions to Quantum Mechanics by Claude

Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloe

Benjamin D. Suh

September 21, 2020

4 CONTENTS

3.12 Infinite one-dimensional well................................ 54 3.13 Infinite two-dimensional well............................... 55 3.14 Matrices........................................... 56

Chapter 1

Waves and Particles. Introduction

to the Fundamental Ideas of

Quantum Mechanics

1.1 Multiple-Slit Experiment

A beam of neutrons of constant velocity, mass Mn(Mn ≈ 1. 67 x 10 −^27 kg) and energy E, is incident on a linear chain of atomic nuclei, arranged in a regular fashion as shown in the figure (these nuclei could be, for example, those of a long, linear molecule). We call l the distance between two consecutive nuclei, and d, their size (d  l). A neutron detector D is placed far away, in a direction which makes an angle of θ with the direction of the incident neutrons.

Figure 1.1: Multiple-slit Experiment

1.1.a Describe qualitatively the phenomena ob-

served at D when the energy E of the incident neu-

trons is varied.

From Complement DI , the fringe separation of the double-slit experi- ment is given by

λD l

. Using the Planck-Einstein relations(A-1), we know that as energy increases, the wavelength decreases. Thus, the distance between successive peaks decreases as well, so we end up seeing more peaks in a given area.

1.2. BOUND STATE OF A PARTICLE IN A ”DELTA FUNCTION POTENTIAL” 7

1.2 Bound State of a Particle in a ”Delta Function Poten-

tial”

Consider a particle whose Hamiltonian H [operator defined by formula (D-10) is:

H = −

ℏ^2

2 m

d^2 dx^2

− αδ(x)

where α is a positive constant whose dimensions are to be found.

1.2.a Integrate the eigenvalue equation of H between − and +. Letting

 approach 0, show that the derivative of the eigenfunction φ(x)

presents a discontinuity at x = 0 and determine it in terms of α, m,

and φ(0).

Nothing doing, let’s do as the question asks,

∫ (^) 

−

H |φ〉 dx =

−

E |φ〉 dx

−

ℏ^2

2 m

d^2 dx^2

φ(x) dx −

−

αδ(x)φ(x) dx = E

−

φ(x) dx

On the right, the integral disappears as  → 0. The delta function only turns on if the integral includes x = 0, and it picks out that value in that integral,

ℏ^2

2 m

dφ(x) dx

x=

x=−

− αφ(0) = 0

dφ(x) dx

x=

dφ(x) dx

x=−

2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2

As  → 0, the left side would disappear unless there were a discontinuity. Since the right side is not equal to zero, there must be a discontinuity in the derivative of φ(x).

1.2.b Assume that the energy E of the particle is negative(bound state).

φ(x) can then be written:

x < 0 φ(x) = A 1 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 exp(−ρx) x > 0 φ(x) = A 2 exp(ρx) + A′ 2 exp(−ρx)

8 CHAPTER 1. WAVES AND PARTICLES. INTRODUCTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS OF QUANTUM

Express the constant ρ in terms of E and m. Using the results of the preceding question, calculate the matrix M defined by:

( A 2 A′ 2

= M

A 1

A′ 1

Then, using the condition that φ(x) must be square-integrable, find the possible values of the energy. Calculate the corresponding normalized wave functions. We can find ρ by using the Schrodinger equation(B-8),

ℏ^2

2 m

d^2 dx^2

φ(x) = Eφ(x)

We only need to look at φ(x) at a single time, so lets look at the case x < 0,

ℏ^2

2 m

(A 1 ρ^2 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 ρ^2 exp(−ρx)) = E(A 1 exp(ρx) + A′ 1 exp(−ρx))

ℏ^2 ρ^2 2 m

= E

ρ^2 = −

2 mE ℏ^2 To calculate the required matrix, we use the discontinuity in the derivative,

dφ(x) dx

x=

dφ(x) dx

x=−

2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2

The first term we will need to use the x > 0 case and x < 0 for the second,

ρA 2 exp(ρ) − A′ 2 ρ exp(−ρ) − A 1 ρ exp(ρ) + A′ 1 ρ exp(−ρ) = −

2 mα ℏ^2

(A 1 + A′ 1 )

Note that we chose an arbitrary case for x = 0. Because φ(x) must be continuous, A 1 + A′ 1 = A 2 + A′ 2. Letting  → 0, we have,

A 2 − A′ 2 − A 1 + A′ 1 = −

2 mα ρℏ^2

(A 1 + A′ 1 )

A 2 = −

2 mα ρℏ^2

(A 1 + A′ 1 ) + A 1 − A′ 1 + A′ 2

Using the continuity of the wavefunction,

2 A 2 = A 1

2 mα ρℏ^2

2 mα ρℏ^2

A′ 1

10 CHAPTER 1. WAVES AND PARTICLES. INTRODUCTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS OF QUANTUM

1.3 Transmission of a ”delta function” potential barrier”

Consider a particle placed in the same potential as in the preceding exercise. The particle is now propagating from left to right along the x axis, with a positive energy E.

1.3.a Show that a stationary state of the particle can be written:

x < 0 φ(x) = exp(ikx) + A exp(−ikx) x > 0 φ(x) = B exp(ikx)

where k, A, and B are constants which are to be calculated in terms of the energy E,

of m and of α(watch out for the discontinuity in dφ dx

at x = 0. By observation, the given wavefunction is not dependant on time, and it follows the form given by (D-7), so it is a stationary state. To determine the constants, we can look at the Schrodinger equation(B-8),

ℏ^2

2 m

d^2 dx^2 φ(x) − αδ(x)φ(x) = Eφ(x)

This holds true for all values of x, so let’s look at x > 0. The delta function term dies,

ℏ^2

2 m

(−Bk^2 exp(ikx)) = EB exp(ikx)

ℏ^2 k^2 2 m

= E

k^2 =

2 mE ℏ^2 At x = 0, we use the wavefunction continuity, B = 1 + A as well as the discontinuity in the first derivative, dφ(x) dx

x=

dφ(x) dx

x=−

2 mαφ(0) ℏ^2

ikB − ik(1 − A) = −

2 mαB ℏ^2

B(ikℏ^2 + 2mα) = ikℏ^2 (1 − A)

B =

ikℏ^2 ikℏ^2 + mα

A = −

mα ikℏ^2 + mα

1.3. TRANSMISSION OF A ”DELTA FUNCTION” POTENTIAL BARRIER” 11

1.3.b Set −EL = −mα^2 / 2 ℏ^2 (bound state energy of the particle). Calcu-

late, in terms of the dimensionless parameter E/EL, the reflec-

tion coefficient R and the transmission coefficient T of the bar-

rier. Study their variations with respect to E; what happens when

E → ∞? How can this be interpreted? Show that, if the expression

of T is extended for negative values of E, it diverges when E → EL,

and discuss this result.

To find the reflection coefficient, we look at the parameters of incoming and outgoing particles. A particle moving to the right has magnitude 1, while a particle moving to the left has magnitude A,

R = |A|^2 =

m^2 α^2 k^2 ℏ^4 + m^2 α^2

m^2 α^2 m^2 α^2 (1 + E/EL)

R =

1 + E/EL

Similarly, a particle moving to the right after passing through the barrier has magnitude B,

T = |B|^2 =

k^2 ℏ^4 k^2 ℏ^4 + m^2 α^2

T =

E/EL

1 + E/EL

We see that T + R = 1. As E → ∞, T → 1 and R → 0, which means the wavefunction has more and more energy to overcome the barrier. As energy increases, the probability that the particle will go through the barrier increases. At E = −EL, it has the same energy as the barrier, which is why we see that discontinuity. Classically, think of this as a ball hitting the top edge of a wall. Small variations around this point determine if the ball is reflected or transmitted.

1.4. DELTA POTENTIAL, FOURIER TRANSFORM 13

We can reverse our Fourier transform to get φ(x),

φ(x) =

αφ(0) 2 πℏ

−∞

exp

ipx ℏ

(p^2 / 2 m − E) dp

φ(x) =

αφ(0)m ℏ

− 2 mE

exp

− 2 mE ℏ

x

To determine the allowed energy, let’s set x = 0 and match sides,

φ(0) =

αmφ(0) ℏ

− 2 mE

In order for this to hold true, αm ℏ

− 2 mE

E = −

α^2 m 2 ℏ^2

1.4.b The average kinetic energy of the particle can be written (cf. chap.

III):

Ek =

2 m

−∞

p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp

Show that, when φ¯(p) is a ”sufficiently smooth” function, we also have:

Ek = −

ℏ^2

2 m

−∞

φ∗(x)

d^2 φ dx^2

dx

These formulas enable us to obtain, in two different ways, the energy Ek for a particle in the bound state calculated in (a). What result is obtained? Note that, in this case φ(x) is not ”regular” at x = 0, where its derivative is discontinuous. It is then necessary to differentiate φ(x) in the sense of distributions, which introduces a contribution of the point x = 0 to the average value we are looking for. Interpret this contribution physically: consider a square well, centered at x = 0, whose width a approaches 0 and whose depth V 0 approaches infinity (so that aV 0 = α), and study the behaviour of the wave function in this well. Starting with the second equation and substituting in the definitions from Appendix I,

φ∗(x)

d^2 φ dx^2

2 πℏ

−∞

exp

ipx ℏ

φ^ ¯(p)

ipx ℏ

exp

ipx ℏ

dp

14 CHAPTER 1. WAVES AND PARTICLES. INTRODUCTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS OF QUANTUM

Ek =

4 mπℏ

−∞

−∞

p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp dx

The constants in front disappear when we integrate over all x,

Ek =

2 m

−∞

p^2 | φ¯(p)|^2 dp

16 CHAPTER 1. WAVES AND PARTICLES. INTRODUCTION TO THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEAS OF QUANTUM

The bound states are given by

exp(−ρl) = ±

2 ρ μ

(i)Ground State. Show that this state is even (invariant with respect to reflection about the point x = l/ 2 ), and that its energy Es is less than the energy −EL introduced in problem 3. Interpret this result physically. Represent graphically the corresponding wave function.

1.6. SQUARE WELL POTENTIAL 17

1.6 Square Well Potential

Consider a square well potential of width a and depth V 0 (in this exercise, we shall use systematically the notation of 2-c-α of complement HI ). We intend to study the properties of the bound state of a particle in a well when its width a approaches zero.

1.6.a Show that there indeed exists only one bound state and calculate

its energy E

we find E ≈ −

mV 0 a^2

2 ℏ^2

, that is, an energy which varies

with the square of the area aV 0 of the well

Chapter 2

The Mathematical Tools of

Quantum Mechanics

2.1 Hermitian Operator

|φn〉 are the eigenstates of a Hermitian operator H (H is, for example, the Hamilto- nian of an arbitrary physical system). Assume that the states |φn〉 form a discrete orthonormal basis. The operator U (m, n) is defined by:

U (m, n) = |φm〉 〈φn|

2.1.a Calculate the adjoint U †(m, n) of U (m, n)

Using the definition of the adjoint,

U †(m, n) = |φn〉 〈φm|

2.1.b Calculate the commutator [H, U (m, n)]

Let’s act the commutator on a vector (looking ahead, we’ll set the vector as |φn〉,

[H, U ] |φn〉 = HU |φn〉 − U H |φn〉

= H |φm〉 〈φn|φn〉 − |φm〉 〈φn|H|φn〉

Since H has eigenkets φn and φm, i.e., { H |φm〉 = m |φm〉 H |φn〉 = n |φn〉

[H, U (m, n)] = m − n

20 CHAPTER 2. THE MATHEMATICAL TOOLS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

2.1.c Prove the relation

U (m, n)U †(p, q) = δnq U (m, p)

Writing this out,

U (m, n)U †(p, q) = |φm〉 〈φn|φq 〉 〈φp|

The middle section dies unless n = q, leaving us the delta function,

= δnq |φm〉 〈φp|

U (m, n)U †(p, q) = δnq U (m, p)

2.1.d Calculate Tr{U (m, n)}, the trace of the operator U (m, n)

By definition, the trace is given by

Tr U =

α

〈α|U |α〉

where α are the basis states.

=

α

〈α|φm〉 〈φn|α〉

Since |φn〉 form a basis, and since we sum over the basis states, at least one part dies unless m = n,

Tr U = δmn

2.1.e Let A be an operator, with matrix elements Amn = 〈φm|A|φn〉. Prove

the relation:

A =

m,n

AmnU (m, n)

Let’s start from the right side. Acting it on |φn〉, we only need to sum over m since we can use orthonormality for n, ∑

m,n

AmnU (m, n) |φn〉 =

m

〈φm|A|φn〉 |φm〉 〈φn|φn〉

Amn is a scalar, so we can move that around for free,

=

m

|φm〉 〈φm|A|φn〉

Performing the sum, the first part becomes identity, so we can remove it, ∑

m,n

AmnU (m, n) |φn〉 = A |φn〉