



Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Prepare-se para as provas
Estude fácil! Tem muito documento disponível na Docsity
Prepare-se para as provas com trabalhos de outros alunos como você, aqui na Docsity
Os melhores documentos à venda: Trabalhos de alunos formados
Prepare-se com as videoaulas e exercícios resolvidos criados a partir da grade da sua Universidade
Responda perguntas de provas passadas e avalie sua preparação.
Ganhe pontos para baixar
Ganhe pontos ajudando outros esrudantes ou compre um plano Premium
Comunidade
Peça ajuda à comunidade e tire suas dúvidas relacionadas ao estudo
Descubra as melhores universidades em seu país de acordo com os usuários da Docsity
Guias grátis
Baixe gratuitamente nossos guias de estudo, métodos para diminuir a ansiedade, dicas de TCC preparadas pelos professores da Docsity
Development-and-validation-of-RP-HPLC-and-ultraviolet-spectrophotometric-methods-of-analysis-for-the-quantitative
Tipologia: Notas de estudo
1 / 6
Esta página não é visível na pré-visualização
Não perca as partes importantes!
Journal of Chromatography B, 830 (2006) 349–
Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S Nagar, Punjab 160 062, India Received 18 March 2005; accepted 11 November 2005 Available online 5 December 2005
Keywords: Lamivudine; Stavudine; Nevirapine; UV spectrophotometry; RP-HPLC
∗ (^) Corresponding author at: School of Biomedical Sciences, University of
Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK. Tel.: +44 28 7032 4128; fax: +44 28 20324965. E-mail address: r.panchagnula@ulster.ac.uk (R. Panchagnula).
1570-0232/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.
Fig. 1. Chemical structures of (a) Lamivudine, (b) Stavudine and (c) Nevirapine.
Table 1 The various chromatographic conditions optimized for analysis of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine by RP-HPLC
Drug Mobile phase Flow rate (ml/min)
Detection wavelength (nm)
Injection volume (l)
Lamivudine Methanol:water (70:30)
Stavudine Methanol:water (20:80)
Nevirapine Solvent A: methanol:water (20:80)
Solvent B: acetoni- trile:isopropyl alcohol (50:50)
Although the λmax 3TC, d4T and NVP are 270, 265 and 313 nm, respectively, 270 nm was used for the quantification by HPLC, since this wavelength was successfully used for the simultaneous drug estimation in combinations.
Fig. 2. Typical chromatograms showing the elution of (a) Lamivudine, (b) Stavudine and (c) Nevirapine at a concentration of 10 g/ml at their respec- tive retention times.
Table 2 Validation parameters of the HPLC method of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine
Validation parameters Lamivudine (3TC) (270 nm) Stavudine (d4T) (270 nm) Nevirapine (NVP) (270 nm)
Range (g/ml) 1–10 1–10 1– Regression equation y = 36868 x − 1029.8 y = 27914 x − 224.39 y = 12013 x − 850. %R.S.D. of slope 7.1 4.8 4. Correlation coefficient ( r^2 ) 0.9996 0.9999 0. Limit of quantification (g/ml) 0.52 ± 0.22 0.09 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0. Limit of detection (g/ml) 0.17 ± 0.07 0.03 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.
Precision Drug conc. (g/ml) Drug conc. (g/ml) Drug conc. (g/ml)
3.0 5.0 9.0 3.0 5.0 9.0 3.0 5.0 9.
Mean 2.99 4.93 8.93 3.07 5.01 8.91 2.99 5.06 9. %R.S.D. 0.82 ± 0.49 1.32 ± 0.81 0.92 ± 0.62 3.0 ± 3.6 0.1 ± 0.05 0.8 ± 0.39 2.7 ± 0.08 3.8 ± 0.19 1.5 ± 0. Percent recovery 99.7 ± 0.8 98.7 ± 0.9 99.2 ± 0.6 102.5 ± 2.3 100.2 ± 0.5 99.0 ± 0.5 99.8±2.7 100.9±3.5 100.1±1.
Three calibration graphs were generated within the same day and on 3 consequent days ( n = 3). The six standard concentrations were evenly distributed in the linearity range. Precision and accuracy were determined with quality control samples at three concentration levels. Data showed the precision of the method at three concentration levels within the calibration range. The slopes are represented as mean ± S.D. with the %R.S.D. given in parentheses.
Table 3 Percent recoveries of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine in commercial formulations by HPLC and UV methods of analysis
Product Component UV method HPLC method
Mean ± S.D. %R.S.D. Mean ± S.D. %R.S.D.
Lamivir Lamivudine 96.53 ± 2.19 2.27 93.16 ± 0.4 0. Stavir Stavudine 103.07 ± 1.8 1.75 99.61 ± 2.4 2. Nevimune Nevirapine 100.32 ± 8.7 8.71 101.87 ± 2.6 2.
The percent recoveries are represented as mean ± S.D. for with n = 3, R.S.D. = relative standand deviation.
Table 4 Validation parameters for UV method of analysis of Lamivudine, Stavudine and Nevirapine
Validation parameters Lamivudine (270 nm) Stavudine (265 nm) Nevirapine (313 nm)
Range (g/ml) 2.5–20 2–20 4– Regression equation y = 0.0417 x + 0.0046 y = 0.0426 x + 0.0012 y = 0.0301 x + 0. %R.S.D. of slope 1.93 1.60 0. Correlation coefficient ( r^2 ) 0.9999 0.9999 0. Limit of quantification (g/ml) 0.58 0.92 0. Limit of detection (g/ml) 0.19 0.29 0.
Precision Drug conc. (g/ml) Drug conc. (g/ml) Drug conc. (g/ml)
7.0 12.0 17.0 4.0 10.0 15.0 8.0 18.0 22.
Mean 6.9 11.8 16.9 3.9 9.9 15.0 7.7 17.6 21. %R.S.D. 1.7 ± 0.43 1.2 ± 0.28 0.7 ± 0.13 2.1 ± 1.25 1.2 ± 0.51 0.7 ± 0.005 1.8 ± 0.14 4.5 ± 0.79 2.9 ± 0. Percent recovery 98.4 98.2 99.3 98.2 99.4 100.2 96.1 100.4 100.
Three calibration graphs were generated on 3 consequent days ( n = 3). The calibration graph was generated with minimum of six concentration evenly distributed throughout the entire range. The accuracy represented by percent recovery and precision was determined using quality control (QC) samples. Precision (%R.S.D.) is calculated as mean ± S.D. with n = 3 for each concentration.