Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad

SIL poster para describir las funciones instrumentadas desegutidadad, Esquemas y mapas conceptuales de Análisis de Seguridad

Mapa conceptual de funciones instrumentadas de seguridad

Tipo: Esquemas y mapas conceptuales

2019/2020

Subido el 06/02/2020

jose-bet
jose-bet 🇵🇪

1 documento

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Flash Fire
Jet Fire
Pool Fire
PFDavg
Without common causes With common causes (Beta factor)
1oo1
DU
TI
λ×2
-
1oo2
1oo2D
12
2
DU DU
TI
λ×λ×3
()
()
()
⎡⎤
⎣⎦
2
DU DU
1-β×λ×TI β×λ×TI
+
32
1oo3
123
3
DU DU DU
TI
λ×λ×λ×4
()
()
()
⎡⎤
⎣⎦
3
DU DU
1-β×λ×TI β×λ×TI
+
42
2oo2
()
12
DU DU
TI
λ+λ×2
()
()
()
⎡⎤
⎣⎦
DU
DU
β×λ×TI
1-β×λ×TI + 2
2oo3
()
()
()
⎡⎤
⎢⎥
⎢⎥
⎢⎥
⎣⎦
12 13
23
2
DU DU DU DU
DU DU
λ×λ+λ×λTI
×3
+λ×λ
()
()
()
⎡⎤
⎣⎦
2DU
DU
β×λ×TI
1-β×λ×TI + 2
Simplified equations
1oo1
(Et 100%)
()
⎡⎤
⎛⎞
⎢⎥
⎜⎟
⎝⎠
⎣⎦
DU
TI SL
λEt × + 1-Et
22
TI: Proof Test time interval
Et: Test Effectiveness
λDU: dangerous undetected failures
AVERAGE PROBABILITY OF FAILURE ON DEMAND (PFDAVG)
SIL
Safety
Integrity
Level
PFDavg
Average probability of
failure on
demand per year
(low demand)
RRF
Risk
Reduction
Factor
PFDavg
Average probability of
failure on
demand per hour
(high demand)
SIL 4 10-5 and < 10-4 100000 to 10000 10-9 and < 10-8
SIL 3 10-4 and < 10-3 10000 to 1000 10-8 and < 10-7
SIL 2 10-3 and < 10-2 1000 to 100 10-7 and < 10-6
SIL 1 10-2 and < 10-1 100 to 10 10-6 and < 10-5
SIL LEVELS ACCORDING IEC 61508 / IEC 61511
RISK IS
NEGLIGIBLE
Tolerable only if further
risk reduction
is impracticable or if its cost are
grossly disproportional to the gained
improvement.
As the risk is reduced, the less
proportionately, it is necessary to
spend to reduce it further,
to satisfy ALARP.
The concept of diminishing
proportion is shown by the triangle.
The ALARP or
tolerability Region
Risk is undertaken only if
a benefit is desired
Intolerable Region
Risk cannot be justified except
in extraordinary circumstances
Broadly Acceptable
Region
No need for detailed working
to demonstrate ALARP
It is necessary to maintain
assurance that risk remains
at this level
TOLERABLE RISKS AND ALARP (ANNEX ‘B’)
SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVEL CALCULATION
INCREASING RISK
Residual
Risk
Tolerable
Risk
EUC Risk
Necessary risk reduction
Actual risk reduction
Partial risk covered by
other technology
safety-related systems
Partial risk covered by
E/E/PE
safety-related system
Partial risk covered by
external risk
reduction facilities
Risk reduction obtained by all safety-related systems and external risk reduction systems
SFF
Hardware fault
tolerance
0
Hardware fault
tolerance
1
Hardware fault
tolerance
2
TYPE A Components
< 60% SIL 1 SIL 2 SIL3
60% - < 90% SIL 2 SIL 3 SIL 4
90% - < 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4
> 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4
TYPE B Components
< 60% Not allowed SIL 1 SIL2
60% - < 90% SIL 1 SIL 2 SIL 3
90% - < 99% SIL 2 SIL 3 SIL 4
> 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4
Failure rates categories: λDD: dangerous detected; λDU: dangerous undetected
λSD: safe detected; λSU: safe undetected
SAFE FAILURE FRACTION (SFF) AND SIL LEVELS
∑∑
∑∑∑
DD SD SU DU
DD DU SD SU TOT
λ+λ+λλ
=1-
λ+λ+λ+λλ
AVAILABILITY AND RELIABILITY
RISK REDUCTION
Vapor cloud explosion (BLEVE)
S
SAFETY
AFETY:
:
FREEDOM
FREEDOM
FROM
FROM
UNACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE
RISK
RISK
MTTFs
1oo1
S
1
λ
1oo2
S
1
2λ
2oo2
2
S
1
2λ×MTTR
2oo3
2
S
1
6λ×MTTR
MEAN TIME TO FAILURE SPURIOUS
Fireball
Tolerable accident frequency 1
=
Frequency of accidents without protections RRF
A
1oo1
A
1oo2
B
A
2oo2
B
A
2oo3
B
C
V
o
t
i
n
g
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES
Basic Concepts:
Acronyms:
MTBF: Mean Time Between Failures
MTTF: Mean Time To Failure
MTTR: Mean Time To Repair
MTBM: Mean Time Between Maintenance
MSD: Expected Mean System Downtime
Failure Rate :
Failures per unit time
λ=Components exposed to functional failure
-9
1 F I T = 1 × 1 0 F a i l u r e s p e r ho u r
MTBF = MTTF + MTTR
MTTF = MTBF- MTTR = 1
λ
Operating Time
Availability
Operating Time + Repair Time
MTTF MTTF μ
=
MTTF + MTTR MTBF μ+λ
MTBM
MTBM + MSD
==
===
=
λ
Unavailability = 1- Availability = μ
Failure time
Time
TTF
t
1
0
Operating time
Reliability
Success
MTBF
MTTF MTTR
Repair
time
(failure)
Success Failure
UNRELIABILITY
UNAVAILABILITY
RELIABILITY
AVAILABILITY
MTTR
MTTF
Quantitative Method for SIL level determination
As found in IEC 61508 Annex ‘C’
Process and
process
control system
Consequence
of Hazardous
Event
Frequency
of Hazardous
Event
Process
Risk
Tolerable
Risk Target
Non-SIS
prevention /
mitigation
protection
layers
SIS
Other
protection
layers
Necessary Risk Reduction
Safety integrity of non-SIS prevention/
mitigation protection layers, other pro-
tection layers, and SIS matched to the
necessary risk reduction
IEC
IEC
61508
61508
IEC
IEC
61511
61511
UNDERSTANDING
UNDERSTANDING
S
SAFETY
AFETY
I
INTEGRITY
NTEGRITY
L
LEVELS
EVELS
ITALY
G.M. INTERNATIONAL S.R.L
Via San Fiorano, 70
20058 Villasanta (MI)
Tel: +39 039 2325038
Fax: +39 039 2325107
info@gmintsrl.com
www.gmintsrl.com
RUSSIA
Serpukhovsky Val 8, Office 10
115191 Moscow
Tel: +7 495 950 5779
Fax: +7 495 952 1006
info@gminternational.ru
www.gminternational.ru
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GM International Safety Inc.
17453 Village Green Drive
Houston, TX 77040
Tel: +1 713 896 0777
Fax: +1 713 896 0782
info@gmisafety.com
www.gmisafety.com

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga SIL poster para describir las funciones instrumentadas desegutidadad y más Esquemas y mapas conceptuales en PDF de Análisis de Seguridad solo en Docsity!

Flash Fire

Jet Fire

Pool Fire

PFDavg

Without common causes With common causes (Beta factor)

1oo1 (^) DU

TI

λ × 2

1oo 1oo2D^1

2 DU DU

TI

λ × λ × 3

2 1-β × λ (^) DU × TI (^) β × λ (^) DU× TI

3 2

1oo3 (^) 1 2 3

3 DU DU DU

TI

λ × λ × λ × 4

3 1-β × λ (^) DU × TI (^) + β × λ (^) DU× TI 4 2

2oo2 ( λ DU 1 + λ DU 2 )× TI

⎡⎣ DU ⎤⎦ DU

β × λ × TI 1-β × λ × TI + 2

2oo

⎡ ⎤ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎥⎦

1 2 1 3 2 3

DU DU DU DU^2 DU DU

λ × λ + λ × λ (^) TI × (^3)

+ λ × λ (^ )^ (^ )^

⎡⎣ ⎤⎦

(^2) DU DU

β × λ × TI 1-β × λ × TI + 2

Simplified equations

1oo (E (^) t ≠ 100%) (^ )

DU

TI SL

λ Et × + 1-Et

TI: Proof Test time interval Et: Test Effectiveness λDU: dangerous undetected failures

A VERAGE P ROBABILITY OF F AILURE ON D EMAND (PFD AVG )

SIL Safety Integrity Level

PFDavg Average probability of failure on demand per year (low demand)

RRF Risk Reduction Factor

PFDavg Average probability of failure on demand per hour (high demand)

SIL 4 ≥^10

-5 (^) and < 10 -4 (^) 100000 to 10000 ≥ 10 -9 (^) and < 10 -

SIL 3 ≥^10

-4 (^) and < 10 -3 (^) 10000 to 1000 ≥ 10 -8 (^) and < 10 -

SIL 2 ≥^10

-3 (^) and < 10 -2 (^) 1000 to 100 ≥ 10 -7 (^) and < 10 -

SIL 1 ≥^10

-2 (^) and < 10 -1 (^) 100 to 10 (^) ≥ 10 -6 (^) and < 10 -

SIL L EVELS ACCORDING IEC 61508 / IEC 61511

RISK IS NEGLIGIBLE

Tolerable only if further risk reduction is impracticable or if its cost are grossly disproportional to the gained improvement. As the risk is reduced, the less proportionately, it is necessary to spend to reduce it further, to satisfy ALARP. The concept of diminishing proportion is shown by the triangle.

The ALARP or tolerability Region

Risk is undertaken only if a benefit is desired

Intolerable Region Risk cannot be justified except in extraordinary circumstances

Broadly Acceptable Region

No need for detailed working to demonstrate ALARP

It is necessary to maintain assurance that risk remains at this level

T OLERABLE RISKS AND ALARP (A NNEX ‘B’)

SAFETY I NTEGRITY L EVEL C ALCULATION

INCREASING RISK

Residual Risk

Tolerable Risk

EUC Risk

Necessary risk reduction Actual risk reduction

Partial risk covered by other technology safety-related systems

Partial risk covered by E/E/PE safety-related system

Partial risk covered by external risk reduction facilities

Risk reduction obtained by all safety-related systems and external risk reduction systems

SFF

Hardware fault tolerance 0

Hardware fault tolerance 1

Hardware fault tolerance 2

TYPE A Components < 60% SIL 1 SIL 2 SIL 60% - < 90% SIL 2 SIL 3 SIL 4 90% - < 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4 > 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4 TYPE B Components < 60% Not allowed SIL 1 SIL 60% - < 90% SIL 1 SIL 2 SIL 3 90% - < 99% SIL 2 SIL 3 SIL 4 > 99% SIL 3 SIL 4 SIL 4

Failure rates categories: λDD : dangerous detected; λDU: dangerous undetected λSD : safe detected; λSU: safe undetected

SAFE F AILURE F RACTION (SFF) AND SIL L EVELS

D D SD SU D U

D D D U SD SU T O T

λ + λ + λ λ = 1- λ + λ + λ + λ λ

A VAILABILITY AND RELIABILITY

RISK REDUCTION

Vapor cloud explosion (BLEVE)

S S AFETYAFETY ::

FREEDOMFREEDOM FROMFROM

UNACCEPTABLEUNACCEPTABLE

RISKRISK

MTTFs

1oo

S

λ

1oo

S

2 λ

2oo2 2

S

2 λ × MTTR

2oo3 2

S

6 λ × MTTR

M EAN T IME T O F AILURE SPURIOUS

Fireball

Tolerable accident frequency 1

Frequency of accidents w ithout protections RRF

A

1oo

A

1oo

B

A

2oo

B

A

2oo

B

C

V o t i n g

SYSTEM A RCHITECTURES

Basic Concepts:

Acronyms: MTBF: Mean Time Between Failures MTTF: Mean Time To Failure MTTR: Mean Time To Repair MTBM: Mean Time Between Maintenance MSD: Expected Mean System Downtime

Failure Rate : λ = Failures per unit time Components exposed to functional failure 1 FIT = 1 × 10-9 Failures per hour MTBF = MTTF + MTTR

MTTF = MTBF - MTTR = 1 λ Operating Time Availability Operating Time + Repair Time MTTF MTTF μ = MTTF + MTTR MTBF μ + λ MTBM MTBM + MSD

= =

= = =

=

λ Unavailability = 1- Availability = μ

Failure time

Time t TTF

1

0

Operating time

Reliability

Success

MTBF

MTTF MTTR

Repair time (failure)

Success Failure

UNRELIABILITY UNAVAILABILITY

RELIABILITY AVAILABILITY

MTTF MTTR

Quantitative Method for SIL level determination As found in IEC 61508 Annex ‘C’

Process and process control system

Consequence of Hazardous Event

Frequency of Hazardous Event

Process Risk

Tolerable Risk Target

Non-SIS prevention / mitigation protection layers

SIS

Other protection layers

Necessary Risk Reduction

Safety integrity of non-SIS prevention/ mitigation protection layers, other pro- tection layers, and SIS matched to the necessary risk reduction

IECIEC

IECIEC

UNDERSTANDINGUNDERSTANDING

SS AFETYAFETY II NTEGRITYNTEGRITY LL EVELSEVELS

ITALY

G.M. INTERNATIONAL S.R.L Via San Fiorano, 70 20058 Villasanta (MI) Tel: +39 039 2325038 Fax: +39 039 2325107

info@gmintsrl.com www.gmintsrl.com

RUSSIA

Serpukhovsky Val 8, Office 10 115191 Moscow Tel: +7 495 950 5779 Fax: +7 495 952 1006

info@gminternational.ru www.gminternational.ru

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

GM International Safety Inc. 17453 Village Green Drive Houston, TX 77040 Tel: +1 713 896 0777 Fax: +1 713 896 0782

info@gmisafety.com www.gmisafety.com