Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad

Uso y seguridad de la azitromicina en neonatos: Una revisión sistemática, Apuntes de Ciencias

Esta revisión sistemática examina el uso de la azitromicina en neonatos, su eficacia en el tratamiento de la neumonía por Chlamydia trachomatis y su posible efecto en el riesgo de enfermedad por desprendimiento de brónquios (BPD). Además, se explora la relación entre la infección por Ureaplasma y el BPD, y se presentan dos estudios off-label que demuestran la eficacia de la azitromicina contra la Chlamydia trachomatis en neonatos. Se discute la seguridad y la dosis adecuada de la azitromicina en este grupo de edad, así como sus posibles efectos secundarios.

Qué aprenderás

  • ¿Cómo se administra la azitromicina a los neonatos y qué dosis se recomienda?
  • ¿Qué efectos secundarios han sido reportados en neonatos tratados con azitromicina?

Tipo: Apuntes

2019/2020

Subido el 09/10/2020

hanz-pichilingue-cruz
hanz-pichilingue-cruz 🇵🇪

3

(1)

5 documentos

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
ACTIVIDAD N 15 MENDELEY
Artículo Científico Revisión Sistémica
DISCUCIÓN
Only a small population of neonates have been treated with azithromycin and
no major AE has been documented. This systematic review shows that
azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of BPD in neonates and is also
effective in the treatment of chlamydia conjunctivitis. A previous systematic
review has also demonstrated the efficacy of azithromycin in the prevention of
BPD.31 Macrolide antibiotics are inhibitors of ureaplasma. The relationship
between ureaplasma infection and BPD has been explored with varying
outcomes reported from different studies.15 17 32 We have also identified two
off-label studies demonstrating the efficacy of azithromycin against chlamydia
trachomatis in neonates. Previous studies have reported the susceptibility of
chlamydia to azithromycin.33 Azithromycin was administered once daily in all
studies because of its long half-life, which is estimated to be between 26 and 83
h in neonates.25 The dose and duration of treatment with azithromycin varied
across the studies. This may be due to its off-label use and the absence of a
standardised dosing regimen for the drug in this age group. Very few studies
have been conducted in neonates; hence the safety and efficacy of different
dosing regimens for different indications have not been established. The
majority of the AEs reported in preterm neonates were related to prematurity
and were unlikely to be caused by azithromycin. Results from one of the
studies, however, showed that azithromycin had a better safety profile than
erythromycin in neonates. Diarrhoea, abdominal discomfort and reduced
appetite were less frequent in azithromycin treated neonates. In another study,
2% and 3%, respectively, of neonates exposed to azithromycin and
erythromycin within 14 days of life developed IHPS.26 Both erythromycin and
azithromycin are gastric motilin receptor agonists (1–9).34 Activation of these
receptors by erythromycin with consequent increased pyloric contractions has
been hypothesised as a possible cause of pyloric hypertrophy in neonates.35
The association between erythromycin and pyloric stenosis has been
demonstrated in previous studies. High dose and early neonatal exposure to the
drug within the first 14 days of life are known risk factors.36 Azithromycin,
similarly to erythromycin, binds to and activates the motilin receptors.37
Erythromycin is, however, believed to have a stronger gastrointestinal prokinetic
effect than azithromycin.38 These drugs are slightly structurally different, with
erythromycin having a 14-C member heterocyclic ring and azithromycin a 15
member ring.39 The effect of the structural differences on motilin receptor
binding and IHPS requires further exploration. Postnatal exposure to macrolides
from breast milk has also been associated with IHPS.40 Further studies are
required to determine the relationship between neonatal azithromycin use and
IHPS. Although prolonged QTc interval and torsades de pointes had been
reported in azithromycin-treated adults,41 none of the reviewed studies
pf3
pf4
pf5

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Uso y seguridad de la azitromicina en neonatos: Una revisión sistemática y más Apuntes en PDF de Ciencias solo en Docsity!

ACTIVIDAD N 15 MENDELEY

Artículo Científico Revisión Sistémica

DISCUCIÓN

Only a small population of neonates have been treated with azithromycin and

no major AE has been documented. This systematic review shows that

azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of BPD in neonates and is also

effective in the treatment of chlamydia conjunctivitis. A previous systematic

review has also demonstrated the efficacy of azithromycin in the prevention of

BPD.31 Macrolide antibiotics are inhibitors of ureaplasma. The relationship

between ureaplasma infection and BPD has been explored with varying

outcomes reported from different studies.15 17 32 We have also identified two

off-label studies demonstrating the efficacy of azithromycin against chlamydia

trachomatis in neonates. Previous studies have reported the susceptibility of

chlamydia to azithromycin.33 Azithromycin was administered once daily in all

studies because of its long half-life, which is estimated to be between 26 and 83

h in neonates.25 The dose and duration of treatment with azithromycin varied

across the studies. This may be due to its off-label use and the absence of a

standardised dosing regimen for the drug in this age group. Very few studies

have been conducted in neonates; hence the safety and efficacy of different

dosing regimens for different indications have not been established. The

majority of the AEs reported in preterm neonates were related to prematurity

and were unlikely to be caused by azithromycin. Results from one of the

studies, however, showed that azithromycin had a better safety profile than

erythromycin in neonates. Diarrhoea, abdominal discomfort and reduced

appetite were less frequent in azithromycin treated neonates. In another study,

2% and 3%, respectively, of neonates exposed to azithromycin and

erythromycin within 14 days of life developed IHPS.26 Both erythromycin and

azithromycin are gastric motilin receptor agonists (1–9).34 Activation of these

receptors by erythromycin with consequent increased pyloric contractions has

been hypothesised as a possible cause of pyloric hypertrophy in neonates.

The association between erythromycin and pyloric stenosis has been

demonstrated in previous studies. High dose and early neonatal exposure to the

drug within the first 14 days of life are known risk factors.36 Azithromycin,

similarly to erythromycin, binds to and activates the motilin receptors.

Erythromycin is, however, believed to have a stronger gastrointestinal prokinetic

effect than azithromycin.38 These drugs are slightly structurally different, with

erythromycin having a 14-C member heterocyclic ring and azithromycin a 15

member ring.39 The effect of the structural differences on motilin receptor

binding and IHPS requires further exploration. Postnatal exposure to macrolides

from breast milk has also been associated with IHPS.40 Further studies are

required to determine the relationship between neonatal azithromycin use and

IHPS. Although prolonged QTc interval and torsades de pointes had been

reported in azithromycin-treated adults,41 none of the reviewed studies

evaluated neonates for arrhythmia. There is a documented case of arrhythmia

in an infant following azithromycin overdose,42 and spiramycin, which is a

structurally similar macrolide, has been associated with neonatal arrhythmia.

Prolonged QTc interval can be normal in the first few days of life in premature

neonates, hence it is difficult to identify drug-induced aetiology during this

period.44 (10)

Referencias Bibliográficas (Vancouver)

1. Korsukewitz C, Reddel SW, Bar-Or A, Wiendl H. Neurological immunotherapy in

the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature. Nat Rev Neurol

[Internet]. 2020 Jul 8 [cited 2020 Jul 18]; Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/

2. Fernández Liz E, Luque Mellado FJ. Revisión sistemática sobre coordinación

terapéutica entre atención primaria y atención especializada. Aten Primaria

[Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Jul 18];39(1):15–21. Available from:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17286919/

3. Payus AO, Lin CLS, Noh MM, Jeffree MS, Ali RA. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the

nervous system: A review of the literature on neurological involvement in novel

coronavirus disease-(COVID-19). Vol. 20, Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical

Sciences. Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FBIH; 2020. p. 283–92.

4. Neri P, Lamperti M, Pichi F. SARS-COV-2 and eye immunity: the lesson was

learned but we are not done yet. Brainstorming on possible pathophysiology

inspired by ocular models. International Ophthalmology. Springer; 2020.

5. Rohani B. Oral manifestations in patients with diabetes mellitus. World J

Diabetes. 2019 Sep 15;10(9):485–9.

6. Allard N, Maruani A, Cret C, Ameri A. Acute hypothermia in Covid 19: A case

report. eNeurologicalSci. 2020 Jun;100248.

7. Asadi-Pooya AA, Simani L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19:

A systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 413, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Elsevier B.V.; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 18]. Available from:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32299017/

8. Montalvan V, Lee J, Bueso T, De Toledo J, Rivas K. Neurological manifestations of

COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review. Vol. 194,

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. Elsevier B.V.; 2020.

9. Smith C, Egunsola O, Choonara I, Kotecha S, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Sammons H. Use

and safety of azithromycin in neonates: A systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 5,

BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group; 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 18]. Available from:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26656010/

10. Baig AM. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. Vol.

Referencias Bibliográficas (Nature)

  1. Korsukewitz, C., Reddel, S. W., Bar-Or, A. & Wiendl, H. Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature. Nat. Rev. Neurol. (2020) doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0385-8.
  2. Fernández Liz, E. & Luque Mellado, F. J. Revisión sistemática sobre coordinación terapéutica entre atención primaria y atención especializada. Aten. Primaria 39 , 15– (2007).
  3. Payus, A. O., Lin, C. L. S., Noh, M. M., Jeffree, M. S. & Ali, R. A. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the nervous system: A review of the literature on neurological involvement in novel coronavirus disease-(COVID-19). Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences vol. 20 283– 292 (2020).
  4. Neri, P., Lamperti, M. & Pichi, F. SARS-COV-2 and eye immunity: the lesson was learned but we are not done yet. Brainstorming on possible pathophysiology inspired by ocular models. International Ophthalmology (2020) doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01495-1.
  5. Rohani, B. Oral manifestations in patients with diabetes mellitus. World J. Diabetes 10 , 485–489 (2019).
  6. Allard, N., Maruani, A., Cret, C. & Ameri, A. Acute hypothermia in Covid 19: A case report. eNeurologicalSci 100248 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.ensci.2020.100248.
  7. Asadi-Pooya, A. A. & Simani, L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. Journal of the Neurological Sciences vol. 413 (2020).
  8. Montalvan, V., Lee, J., Bueso, T., De Toledo, J. & Rivas, K. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery vol. 194 (2020).
  9. Smith, C. et al. Use and safety of azithromycin in neonates: A systematic review. BMJ Open vol. 5 (2015).
  10. Baig, A. M. Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics vol. 26 499–501 (2020).

Referencias Bibliográficas (Cite Them Right 10h edition - Harvard)

Allard, N. et al. (2020) ‘Acute hypothermia in Covid 19: A case report’, eNeurologicalSci. Elsevier BV, p. 100248. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2020.100248. Asadi-Pooya, A. A. and Simani, L. (2020) ‘Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review’, Journal of the Neurological Sciences. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116832. Baig, A. M. (2020) ‘Neurological manifestations in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2’, CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 499–501. doi: 10.1111/cns.13372. Fernández Liz, E. and Luque Mellado, F. J. (2007) ‘Revisión sistemática sobre coordinación terapéutica entre atención primaria y atención especializada’, Atencion Primaria. Ediciones Doyma, S.L., 39(1), pp. 15–21. doi: 10.1157/13098274. Korsukewitz, C. et al. (2020) ‘Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature.’, Nature reviews. Neurology. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0385-8. Montalvan, V. et al. (2020) ‘Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: A systematic review’, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105921. Neri, P., Lamperti, M. and Pichi, F. (2020) ‘SARS-COV-2 and eye immunity: the lesson was learned but we are not done yet. Brainstorming on possible pathophysiology inspired by ocular models’, International Ophthalmology. Springer. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01495-1. Payus, A. O. et al. (2020) ‘SARS-CoV-2 infection of the nervous system: A review of the literature on neurological involvement in novel coronavirus disease-(COVID-19)’, Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FBIH, pp. 283–292. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2020.4860. Rohani, B. (2019) ‘Oral manifestations in patients with diabetes mellitus’, World Journal of Diabetes. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc., 10(9), pp. 485–489. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i9.485. Smith, C. et al. (2015) ‘Use and safety of azithromycin in neonates: A systematic review’, BMJ Open. BMJ Publishing Group. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008194.