Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Understanding the Nature of Science: A Physics Perspective, Papers of Physics

A problem statement for an essay assignment in a physics 201 class, due in november 2002. Students are asked to explore the concept of science, focusing on scientific theories and their characteristics. The instructor provides some guidelines and resources to help students develop their essays. A list of potential essay topics and criteria for scientific theories.

Typology: Papers

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-j1z
koofers-user-j1z 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Physics 201- Fall 2002
“What is Science?” Problem
Due November 18
We’re nearing the end of our journey of understanding the world and how it
works. (The journey does continue with PHYS 202 in the spring semester, but I realize
that many of you will probably not be taking it,… but please do consider taking it!) One
of the skills I had hoped we would all improve during this semester was the classic
“critical thinking”. That can mean so many things, depending on what discipline you’re
studying. What does it mean in the context of physics? Well, I would say that it means
understanding what a scientific theory is and being able to generate one yourself or
analyze and critique somebody else’s.
Of course such analysis requires logical thought, but is there more? I would say,
“yes.” I think that logic is certainly a large portion of what we do, but logic is used in
many fields that aren’t necessarily scientific. So, what I’m asking you is: What is
science? Or, what makes a scientific theory? Yes, this is an essay,… with words.
This is a fairly broad topic, so let me put it context. I want to discuss some
theories people have proposed about certain electrical phenomena, before the semester
ends. To do this, I think it is important to first think about what makes something
scientific. You’re free to take any angle of this as long as you answer the question(s):
What is science? Or, what makes a scientific theory?
I’m including some material that may help spark some creativity. I’m including
some questions below that you might want to consider in the essay. Also, I’m giving you
a copy of one committee’s thoughts for six criteria that can be used to determine if a
theory is scientific. Also, I’ve copies a couple sections from the book Physics in the Real
World by Keith Lockett. For the most part, this book describes a real life context
(ordinary or otherwise) and explains the physics involved; however, these sections deal
more with psuedoscience. Again, they are meant as possible starting points for your
thoughts. (I’ve highlighted some of Lockett’s questions which you now have enough
physics to answer and therefore address the specific situations he describes. Though
these aren’t part of this assignment.)
As far as the logistics go, these essays should be typed, roughly 2 pages, double
spaced. If you want to write more, please do, but don’t kill yourself. Yes, spelling
grammar, structure and citations do matter. How you communicate your thoughts is
important in all walks of life.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Understanding the Nature of Science: A Physics Perspective and more Papers Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Physics 201- Fall 2002 “What is Science?” Problem Due November 18

We’re nearing the end of our journey of understanding the world and how it works. (The journey does continue with PHYS 202 in the spring semester, but I realize that many of you will probably not be taking it,… but please do consider taking it!) One of the skills I had hoped we would all improve during this semester was the classic “critical thinking”. That can mean so many things, depending on what discipline you’re studying. What does it mean in the context of physics? Well, I would say that it means understanding what a scientific theory is and being able to generate one yourself or analyze and critique somebody else’s. Of course such analysis requires logical thought, but is there more? I would say, “yes.” I think that logic is certainly a large portion of what we do, but logic is used in many fields that aren’t necessarily scientific. So, what I’m asking you is: What is science? Or, what makes a scientific theory? Yes, this is an essay,… with words. This is a fairly broad topic, so let me put it context. I want to discuss some theories people have proposed about certain electrical phenomena, before the semester ends. To do this, I think it is important to first think about what makes something scientific. You’re free to take any angle of this as long as you answer the question(s): What is science? Or, what makes a scientific theory? I’m including some material that may help spark some creativity. I’m including some questions below that you might want to consider in the essay. Also, I’m giving you a copy of one committee’s thoughts for six criteria that can be used to determine if a theory is scientific. Also, I’ve copies a couple sections from the book Physics in the Real World by Keith Lockett. For the most part, this book describes a real life context (ordinary or otherwise) and explains the physics involved; however, these sections deal more with psuedoscience. Again, they are meant as possible starting points for your thoughts. (I’ve highlighted some of Lockett’s questions which you now have enough physics to answer and therefore address the specific situations he describes. Though these aren’t part of this assignment.) As far as the logistics go, these essays should be typed, roughly 2 pages, double spaced. If you want to write more, please do, but don’t kill yourself. Yes, spelling grammar, structure and citations do matter. How you communicate your thoughts is important in all walks of life.

Possible essay topics or starting points

  1. What are the basic assumptions of science?
  2. What are appropriate values (attitudes) for scientists?
  3. Explain the statement, “Science is tentative.”
  4. What is a fact?
  5. Do scientific facts ever change?
  6. What is a principle?
  7. What is a law?
  8. What is a prediction?
  9. What is a hypothesis?
  10. What is a theory?
  11. How does a hypothesis differ from a theory?
  12. Are scientific theories always correct?
  13. How does a scientific statement differ from a non-scientific statement?
  14. What is meant by Popper's Principle of Falsifiability?
  15. What is a proof?
  16. What is causality?
  17. What is deduction?
  18. What is induction?
  19. What is logic?
  20. How does belief differ from knowledge? Define each, and then give and explain some examples.
  21. What is pseudoscience?
  22. What is religion?
  23. How do science, pseudoscience, and religion differ?
  24. What is the role of experimentation in science?
  25. What is the relationship between science and society?

Using the idea of “Natural”, which of the following is a scientific statement, and which one is not a scientific statement?

  • Green plants convert sunlight into energy.
  • With a rod, Moses parted the sea so his people could cross to the other side..
  1. Predictability : The natural cause (mechanism) of the naturally occurring event can be used to make specific predictions. Each prediction can be tested to determine if the prediction is true of false.

Using the idea of “Predictability”, which of the following is a scientific statement, and which one is not a scientific statement?

  • Without sunlight (or comparable artificial light), green plants will die.
  • If you are a “Scorpio”, your horoscope for today is "You'll be saying 'I feel rich !' Lunar position highlights back pay, refunds, correction of accounting error."
  1. Testability : The natural cause (mechanism) of the naturally occurring event must be testable through the processes of science, controlled experimentation being essential. Reference to supernatural events or causes are not relevant tests.

Using the idea of “Testability”, which of the following is a scientific statement, and which one is not a scientific statement?

  • The Bermuda Triangle causes ships and planes to sink and disappear.
  • Life comes from life and cannot come from non-life.
  1. Tentativeness : Scientific theories are subject to revision and correction, even to the point of the theory being proven wrong. Scientific theories have been modified and will continue to be modified to consistently explain observations of naturally occurring events.

Using the idea of “Tentativeness”, which of the following is a scientific statement, and which one is not a scientific statement?

  • The number of human chromosomes was once “known” to be 48, but is now considered to be 46.
  • Living things were once grouped into 2 major groups, then 3, then 4, and now 5, because the criteria used for classifying living things have changed.
  • We know that the world began about 6000 years ago, and nothing will change that.
  • At one time, it was thought the heart pumped blood out of a large container as an “open system”, but now it is known that blood “circulates” in a closed system.