






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
High drug costs are often in the news. Consumer groups contend that the pricing for some drugs is “too high” considering that the costs to manufacture each dose in so low. They talk of price gouging and excessive profits. Pharmaceutical companies defend the price charged on the basis of non-manufacturing costs such as research and development and others.
Typology: Exams
1 / 11
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Question #1. 25% High drug costs are often in the news. Consumer groups contend that the pricing for some drugs is “too high” considering that the costs to manufacture each dose in so low. They talk of price gouging and excessive profits. Pharmaceutical companies defend the price charged on the basis of nonmanufacturing costs such as research and development and others. The following is a generic value chain for a pharmaceutical firm:
distribution) should be used to determine the cost of the drug. The expected price then can be calculated by assuming a certain profit margin over the cost.
Where C=cost, x= (every 1000 customers). Taking a range of values for x=1,2,3...10 and calculating corresponding C values, we get the graph below. Excel has been used for these calculations. So the graph will be below :
A-Contribution margin percent : Because variable costs decrease, the contribution margin percent will increase. Contribution margin ratio= (revenue-variable expenses)/revenue The contribution margin will increase if there is a reduction in variable costs and expenses per unit.In the 1940s, variablle cost was higher therefore the CM percentage was lower compared to in the 1990s.Lower variable cost equals higher CM percentage. As per cost function, the variable expense has decreased during 1990s(7$ compared to 15$ in 1940s), hence contribution margin ratio has increased during 1990s. B-Break-even point : with an increase in fixed costs and a decrease in variable costs, the impact on the break-even point cannot be determined. If there is a change, the bep will likely increase because of downward pressure on prices. Break-even point shifts to the right if there is an increase in fixed cost and decrease in variable cost. To reduce a company’s break-even point you could reduce the amount of fixed costs. In the 1990s the fixed cost higher and variable cost was lower, causing the break-even point to shift to the right. 3- Operating leverage= (revenue-variable cost)/ (revenue -variable cost- fixed operating cost) Taking customers = 3000000000 and price as 20 and net income as flat over the years Operating leverage for 1940s = 3000000(20-15)/[3000000(20-15)-2000000]=15000000/(13000000)= 1.1538(approx) Operating leverage for 1990s = 3000000(20-7)/[3000000(20-7)-5000000]=39000000/(34000000)= 1.1471(approx) Therefore, I can say that change in the cost structure has reduced Billot's operating leverage. A high operating leverage means proportion of variable costs is higher compared to fixed costs. Less no of customers are required to cover total costs. Therefore, a high operating leverage results in lower profits and a low operating leverage leads to higher profits. As operating leverage has reduced during 1990s, it can be concluded that profitability has increased during that period.
Direct Materials $ Direct Labor (5 hours at $11 per hour) $ 55 Overhead ($18 per direct labor hour) $ 90 Total cost per 1000 square feet $ She is quite certain about the estimates for direct materials and for labor. However she is not as comfortable with the overhead estimate. The estimate of $18 per direct labor hour was determined by dividing the total overhead for the 12 month period ($1,296,000) by the total direct labor hours (72,000). By using a regression of overhead on direct labor hours the following cost formula was obtained: Overhead = $52,400 + $9.25 DLH
Bid for a 50,000 square feet project under both cost formulas: Preliminary Estimation Method: Particulars Calculation Amount($) Direct Material ($390/1000) X 50,000 19, Direct Labor ($55/1000) X 50,000 2, Overheads ($90/1000) X 50,000 4, Total Cost per 50,000 sq feet 26, Therefore, Total cost as per preliminary estimation of 50,000 square feet is $26,750. Least Square Regression Method: Particulars Calculation Amount($) Direct Material ($390/1000) X 50,000 19, Direct Labor ($55/1000) X 50,000 2, Overheads 250 hours X $9.25 2, Total Cost per 50,000 sq feet 24, Therefore, Total cost as per Least Square Regression of 50,000 square feet is $24,563. 3. The preliminary estimation method is recommended to use as it is higher than the least square method. It will also give good return.
She could reduce certain fixed costs to improve cash flow is a possible way , but may require decisions like moving to a less expensive workplace or reducing the number of employees. Other fixed costs, like depreciation, on the other hand, won’t improve her cash flow but may improve the company’s balance sheet. One way she could reduce variable costs is by finding a lower-cost supplier for the company’s product.
These are the decisions that must be made by a firm’s top management using microeconomic data and formulas. The decision-making processes are determined by analysis of the information and the choosing the best-case scenario. More often than not, senior managers make the right decisions. It’s not unusual, however, for top managers to make a wrong decision, and sometimes a series of wrong decisions that may eventually prove fatal to their companies.
Variance Analysis for Connor Company Actual Results (1) Flexible- Budget Variances (2) = (1) – (3) Flexible Budget (3) Sales- Volume Variances (4) = (3) – (5) Static Budget (5) Output units Direct materials Direct manufacturing labor Direct marketing labor Total direct costs
Flexible-budget variance Sales-volume variance $48,000 F Static-budget variance b. The Level 1 analysis shows total direct costs have a $48,000 favorable variance. However, the Level 2 analysis reveals that this favorable variance is due to the reduction in output of 1,200 units from the budgeted 10,000 units. Once this reduction in output is taken into account (via a flexible budget), the flexible-budget variance shows each direct cost category to have an unfavorable variance indicating less efficient use of each direct cost item than was budgeted, or the use of more costly direct cost items than was budgeted, or both. Hence, the vice president is not satisfied with the performance of the company. Because the original cost of production of the company is more than the budgeted cost. It shows the bad performance of the company. Revised performance report using flexible budget and static budget. Actual unit variable cost that exceeds budgeted unit cost for each direct cost category: Details Actual Budgeted Units Direct materials Direct manufacturing labor Direct marketing labor
Causes of these more aggregated (Level 2) variances can be identified by analyzing efficiency and price variances of each category of cost.