Name: ___________________________________________ Period: ________ Date: _________
Unit
Weber’s Least Cost Theory
Human Geography
7
Alfred Weber (1868-1958) formulated a theory of industrial location in which an industry is located where it can
minimize its costs, and therefore maximize its profits. Weber’s least cost theory accounted for the location of a
manufacturing plant in terms of the owner’s desire to minimize THREE categories of cost:
1) Transportation: the site chosen
must entail the lowest possible cost
of A) moving raw materials to the
factory, and B) finished products to
the market. This, according to
Weber, is the most important.
2) Labor: higher labor costs reduce
profits, so a factory might do better
farther from raw materials and
markets if cheap labor is available
(e.g. China – today)
3) Agglomeration: when a large number
of enterprises cluster (agglomerate) in the
same area (e.g. city), they can provide
assistance to each other through shared
talents, services, and facilities (e.g.
manufacturing plants need office furniture)
Figures 1-3 show the weight-losing case, in which the weight of the final product is less than the weight of the raw
material going into making the product. In Figure 1, the processing plant is located somewhere between the source and
the market. The increase in transport cost to the left of the processing plant is the cost of transporting the raw material
from its source. The rise in the transportation cost to the right of the processing plant is the cost of transporting the final
product. Note the line on the left of the processing plant has a steeper slope than the one on the right.
The weight gaining case is illustrated in Figures 4- 6, where the final product is heavier than the raw materials that
require transport. Usually this is a case of some ubiquitous (available everywhere) raw material such as water being
incorporated into the product. The optimal location of the processing plant in this case is at the market. Weber
established that firms producing goods less bulky than the raw materials used in their production would settle near to
the raw-material source. Firms producing heavier goods would settle near their market. The firm minimizes the weight
it has to transport and, thus, its transport costs.
