

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Alfred weber's least cost theory is a human geography concept that explains the location of a manufacturing plant based on minimizing three categories of cost: transportation, labor, and agglomeration. Weber believed that the lowest transportation cost, especially for raw materials and finished products, is the most important factor. Weber's theory, its implications, and how it can be applied to real-life scenarios, such as deciding the location for a new brewery or steel factory.
What you will learn
Typology: Slides
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Weber’s Least Cost Theory Human Geography
Alfred Weber (1868-1958) formulated a theory of industrial location in which an industry is located where it can minimize its costs, and therefore maximize its profits. Weber’s least cost theory accounted for the location of a manufacturing plant in terms of the owner’s desire to minimize THREE categories of cost:
1) Transportation: the site chosen must entail the lowest possible cost of A) moving raw materials to the factory, and B) finished products to the market. This, according to Weber, is the most important.
2) Labor: higher labor costs reduce profits, so a factory might do better farther from raw materials and markets if cheap labor is available (e.g. China – today)
3) Agglomeration: when a large number of enterprises cluster (agglomerate) in the same area (e.g. city), they can provide assistance to each other through shared talents, services, and facilities (e.g. manufacturing plants need office furniture)
Figures 1-3 show the weight-losing case, in which the weight of the final product is less than the weight of the raw material going into making the product. In Figure 1, the processing plant is located somewhere between the source and the market. The increase in transport cost to the left of the processing plant is the cost of transporting the raw material from its source. The rise in the transportation cost to the right of the processing plant is the cost of transporting the final product. Note the line on the left of the processing plant has a steeper slope than the one on the right.
The weight gaining case is illustrated in Figures 4- 6, where the final product is heavier than the raw materials that require transport. Usually this is a case of some ubiquitous (available everywhere) raw material such as water being incorporated into the product. The optimal location of the processing plant in this case is at the market. Weber established that firms producing goods less bulky than the raw materials used in their production would settle near to the raw-material source. Firms producing heavier goods would settle near their market. The firm minimizes the weight it has to transport and, thus, its transport costs.
Industrial Location Assignment
Directions: Read Chapter 12 and answer the following questions. Type or write clearly on a separate sheet of paper.
Material (per case) Rail Transport Cost Road Transport Cost Hops & Grain $.10/mile $.11/mile Spring Water $.05/mile $.03/mile Bottled Beer $.25/mile $.27/mile
According to Weber, where will you locate the new brewery and why?
Material (per case) Rail Transport Cost Road Transport Cost Iron Ore $.40/mile $.44/mile Coal $.35/mile $.35/mile Steel $.30/mile $.33/mile
According to Weber, where will you locate the new steel factory and why?
Iron Ore Coal