









Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This unit aims to help high school students understand the relationship between surface area and volume of a cylindrical soda can through a real-world application. Students will calculate the surface area and volume of the can, use technology to test optimized dimensions, create a net and three-dimensional model, and construct an argument for or against changing the can's dimensions. The unit covers mathematical performance expectations (MPEs) and NCTM standards.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 15
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
This unit is designed for high school students to understand the relationship between surface area and volume through a social justice application. Students will work in teams as they are introduced to the calculus topic of optimization to minimize the surface area of a cylinder using the volume as a constraint. First, students will measure a soda can and calculate the volume and surface area. Then they will use an Excel spreadsheet to test new dimensions and choose the one which provides the minimum surface area. Students will design a model using their chosen dimensions. Finally, students will prepare an argument for why or why not soda companies should consider their new design.
Lauren LaVenture Lord Botetourt High School Botetourt County Public Schools
Mathematical Modeling: Capstone Course
Geometry
The student will: calculate surface area and volume of a cylinder use technology (Excel spreadsheet) to test and judge optimized dimensions create a net and three dimensional model construct an argument for or against changing the dimensions of a soda can
MPE 2: Collect and analyze data, determine the equation of the curve of best fit, make predictions, and solve real-world problems using mathematical models. Mathematical models will include polynomial, exponential, and logarithmic functions.
MPE 6: The student will use formulas for surface area and volume of three-dimensional objects to solve real-world problems. MPE 7:The student will use similar geometric objects in two- or three-dimensions to a) compare ratios between side lengths, perimeters, areas, and volumes; b) determine how changes in one or more dimensions of an object affect area and/or volume of the object; c) determine how changes in area and/or volume of an object affect one or more dimensions of the object; and d) solve real-world problems about similar geometric objects.
Through this unit students will see how surface area and volume are related but can be manipulated independently. Students are introduced to a calculus concept of optimization while minimizing the surface area in an effort to reduce waste and live greener. Students will make an argument, targeted to the soda company, to persuade them to change the dimensions of the soda can or maintain the current dimensions.
Unit handout and rubric for students (attached in the lesson) Soda cans Rulers Calculators Microsoft Excel (example spreadsheet attached in the lesson) Construction paper Scissors Tape Compasses Internet
Worksheets created by Kuta Infinite Geometry Software Website: Keep America Beautiful www.kab.org
Assessments will be in the form of: Mathematical accuracy Oral presentation of argument Participation Rubric for overall unit performance (attached) All specific questions for the assessments are attached in the respective lessons
Mathematical accuracy is graded on correctness for the following: Surface area of soda can Volume of soda can Minimized surface area dimensions (Excel) Construction of model *keys provided for each in the lessons The group argument will be assessed on preparation and persuasive strength. There is no right or wrong side. Participation of each individual group member will be evaluated by each member and the instructor using a rubric. Each student will receive a final unit grade using a rubric which contains all of the points mentioned above. The rubric can be seen in the following lessons.
Regular Schedule: about 5-6 days Block Schedule: about 3- 4 days
Lesson 2: Minimizing the Surface Area
Objectives: Students will use technology (Excel spreadsheet) to test and judge optimized dimensions
Standards: MPE 2 and AII.9: Collect and analyze data, determine the equation of the curve of best fit, make predictions, and solve real-world problems using mathematical models. Mathematical models will include polynomial, exponential, and logarithmic functions. MPE 7 and G.14: The student will use similar geometric objects in two- or three-dimensions to b) determine how changes in one or more dimensions of an object affect area and/or volume of the object; c) determine how changes in area and/or volume of an object affect one or more dimensions of the object; and d) solve real-world problems about similar geometric objects. NCTM Geometry: analyze properties and determine attributes of two- and three-dimensional objects;
Materials: Microsoft Excel spreadsheet – at least 1 per group
Process:
Formulas: Height column = (17.29/(3.14159(B3)^2)) Surface Area column = =(23.14159B3^2)+(23.14159B3C3)
y = 22.94x^2 - 64.218x + 81. R² = 0.
37
38
39
40
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Radius (in) Poly. (Radius (in))
Figure 1: This is the net of the model with the specific lengths labeled
Figure 2: This is the net folded and taped up to represent the optimized dimensions of the soda can
Lesson 4: Choose a Side and Present an Argument
Objectives: Students will construct an argument for or against changing the dimensions of a soda can
Standards: MPE 7 and G.14: The student will use similar geometric objects in two- or three-dimensions to b) determine how changes in one or more dimensions of an object affect area and/or volume of the object; c) determine how changes in area and/or volume of an object affect one or more dimensions of the object; and d) solve real-world problems about similar geometric objects.
NCTM Geometry: Analyze properties and determine attributes of two- and three-dimensional objects; Visualize three-dimensional objects and spaces from different perspectives and analyze their cross sections; Use geometric models to gain insights into, and answer questions in, other areas of mathematics; Use geometric ideas to solve problems in, and gain insights into, other disciplines and other areas of interest such as art and architecture.
Materials: Soda cans Models Internet for research Presentation software such as Microsoft Power Point Participation rubric – each student will need one for each group member including themselves (appendix 4) Unit rubric 1 for each student (appendix 5)
Process:
Appendix 1: Student Unit Handout
Being Green: Minimizing the Surface Area of a Soda Can
You and your teammates are concerned citizens. You see so many soda cans being thrown away or tossed on the side of the road and you want to do something about it. Sure you could promote a recycling program (which is a great idea) but you want to make a difference that will help the cans carelessly strewn along the roadway. You and your teammates will test if there is another design for the soda can that is still cylindrical and still holds 12 fluid ounces, but reduces waste. Once the new design is made, you and your team will need to construct a convincing argument for the soda company to either alter the current soda can or keep it the same.
Acceptable Mathematical Accuracy
Accurately measured the soda can Accurately calculated the volume Accurately calculated the surface area Accurately found the optimized dimensions Accurately constructed the model
Acceptable: 10 points Borderline: 8 points Inadequate: 5 points Unacceptable: 2 points
Argument Created a list of at least 6 comparisons Argument has at least 3 statements At least one statement is mathematically based beyond the project Argument was designed to persuade a soda company
Acceptable: 15 points Borderline: 12 points Inadequate: 8 points Unacceptable: 4 points
Presentation Each member had a role in the presentation Presentation was clear and persuasive
Acceptable: 10 points Borderline: 8 points Inadequate: 5 points Unacceptable: 2 points Participation Determined by the average ratings given by yourself, teammates, and your teacher in the following categories: contribution, attitude, encouragement of others, listening to others, making decisions, knowledge, organization
Acceptable: 5 points Borderline: 4 points Inadequate: 3 points Unacceptable: 2 points
Appendix 2: Kuta Infinite Geometry Software Surface Area and Volume Worksheet
Answer Key:
Answer Key:
Appendix 4: Participation Rubric Source: HA Program, Auburn U. Mark Burns, Instructor