Unit 7 Land Use Models | AP Human Geography, Lecture notes of Human Geography

Download Unit 7 Land Use Models | AP Human Geography and more Lecture notes Human Geography in PDF only on Docsity!

Unit 7

Land Use Models

All information in this packet is from the LEWIS HISTORICAL SOCIETY AP HUMAN GEOGRAPHY website.

Central Place Theory By: Cho and Liwanag Central Place Theory A central place is a market center for the exchange of goods and services by people attracted from the surrounding area. The central place is so called because it is centrally located to maximize accessibility from the surrounding region. Central places compete against each other to serve as markets for goods and services, according to central place theory. The geographic concept of central place theory explains how services are distributed and why a regular pattern of settlements exists, at least in a MDC such as the United States. Central Place Theory was first proposed in the 1930s by German geographer Walter Christaller, based on his studies of southern Germany. August Losch in Germany and Brian Berry and others in the U.S further developed concepts during the 1950s. The theory applies most clearly in regions such as the Great Plains, which are neither heavily industrialized nor interrupted by major physical features such as rivers or mountain ranges. In regards to human geography, central place theory is another way to help predict how cities grow and develop. Nodal regions such as market areas and locations of resources and certain activities are also pointed out by central place theory. Central place theory helps in answering why certain consumer services are distributed in a regular pattern, as observed in actual cities. Christaller postulated: Cites would be regularly spaced w/central places where the same product was sold at the same price was a standard distance apart Each city has a complementary region in which they have a monopoly on the sale of certain goods Assumptions Many of the assumptions that go with this model are similar to the ones in the von Thunen Model. To develop the theory, Christaller made the following simplifying assumptions:

• an unbounded isotropic (all flat), homogeneous, unbounded limitless surface (abstract space)
• an evenly distributed population
• all settlements are equidistant and exist in a triangular lattice pattern
• evenly distributed resources
• distance decay mechanism
• perfect competition and all sellers are economic men maximizing their profits
• consumers are of the same income level and same shopping behavior
• all consumers have a similar purchasing power and demand for goods and services
• Consumers visit the nearest central places that provide the function which they demand. They minimize the distance to be travelled
• no provider of goods or services is able to earn excess profit(each supplier has a monopoly over a hinterland)
• there is only one type of transport and this would be equally easy in all directions
• transport cost is proportional to distance traveled in example, the longer distance = the higher transport cost

Visit nearest central places that provide what they need. Market Area/Hinterlands The area surrounding a service from which customers are attracted is the market area/hinterland. This is a large tributary trade area that is associated with central places that offer many services. EX: since people get services from the nearest location, consumers near the center of the circle obtain services from local establishments. The closer to the periphery of the circle, the greater the percentage of consumers who will choose to obtain services from other nodal regions. Size of Market Area/Hinterland To determine the extent of a market area, geographers need a service’s range and threshold. Range The maximum distance people are willing to travel to use a service or purchase good A Convenience store has a small range, whereas a baseball stadium has a large range. The range is the radius of the circle drawn to outline a service’s hinterland To determine the range, geographers observe consumer behavior How far the typical customer is willing to travel for various services Threshold The minimum number of people needed to support the service Low-order goods Things used frequently, like food and routine household items These items are purchased regularly so small businesses in small towns can survive because people will buy at the closer locations instead of going into the city. High-order goods Specialized items, like cars, that are not often bought Since people do not purchase them regularly, many businesses selling these items cannot survive in areas where the population is small. They locate in larger cities with a large population Hierarchy of Tertiary Centers At the top are regional metropolises Offer all services and have large hinterlands At the bottom are small market villages and roadside hamlets The central place is located at the vertexes (points) of equilateral triangles. They then serve the evenly distributed consumers who are closest to the central place. As the vertexes connect, they form a series of hexagons- the traditional shape in many central place models. This shape is ideal because it allows the triangles formed by the central place vertexes to connect and it represents the assumption that consumers will visit the closest place offering the goods. Concentric Zone Model By: Joan Bunyi

The Concentric Zone model is a model of the internal structure of cities in which social groups are spatially arranged in a series of rings. The Concentric Zone model was the first to explain the distribution of different social groups within urban areas. It was originally based off Chicago (although the model does not apply well to Chicago today). The model was created in 1923 by E.W. Burgess, Robert Park, and Roderick McKenzie. The idea behind this model is that the city grows outward from a central area in a series of rings. The size of the rings may vary, but the order always remains the same. This model suggests that the social structure extends outwards from the central business district, meaning that the lower classes live closer to the city center, while the upper classes live farther from the city center because they can afford the commute. Also, as you get further away from the city density decreases. The rent tends to increase as you get further away from the CBD and residents are more likely to rent near the center. As you get further away from the CBD it is more likely that you will find condominiums. Indianapolis is a city that can be applied to the concentric zone model today. That is because more people rent near the CBD than away from it. However, this model has its weaknesses. It does not take into account any physical barriers and it does not take into account gentrification- which may occur in these cities. An important feature of this model is the positive correlation of socio-economic status of households with distance from the CBD — more affluent households were observed to live at greater distances from the central city. Burgess described the changing spatial patterns of residential areas as a process of "invasion" and "succession." As the city grew and developed over time, the CBD would exert pressure on the zone immediately surrounding it (the zone of transition). Outward expansion of the CBD would invade nearby residential neighborhoods causing them to expand outward. The process was thought to continue with each successive neighborhood moving further from the CBD. He suggested that inner-city housing was largely occupied by immigrants and households with low socio-economic status. As the city grew and the CBD expanded outward, lower status residents moved to adjacent neighborhoods, and more affluent residents moved further from the CBD. Burgess's work is based on the bid rent curve. This states that the concentric circles are based on the amount that people will pay for the land. This value is based on the profits that are obtainable from maintaining a business on that land. The center of the town will have the highest number of customers so it is profitable for retail activities. Manufacturing will pay slightly less for the land as they are only interested in the accessibility for workers, 'goods in' and 'goods out'. Residential land use will take the surrounding land. Problems with the Concentric Zone Model The model has been challenged by many contemporary urban geographers. Firstly, the model does not work well with cities outside the United States, in particular with those developed under different historical contexts. Even in the United States, because of changes such as advancement in transportation and information technology and transformation in global economy, cities are no longer organized with clear "zones" (see: Los Angeles School of Urban Analysis).

• It assumes an isotropic plain - an even, unchanging landscape
• Physical features - land may restrict growth of certain sectors
• Commuter villages defy the theory, being in the commuter zone but located far from the city
• Decentralization of shops, manufacturing industry, and entertainment
• Urban regeneration and gentrification - more expensive property can be found in 'low class' housing areas
• Many new housing estates were built on the edges of cities in Britain
• It does not address local urban politics and forces of globalization
• The model does not work well for cities which are essentially federations of similar sized towns, for example Stoke-on-Trent The Different Rings of the Concentric Zone Model

1. Central Business District (CBD)- This area of the city is a non-residential area and it’s where businesses are. This area s called downtown in the U.S. and city center in Europe. This area has a developed transportation system to accommodate commuters coming into the CBD. Also, due to the high land cost in this area, a lot of sky scrapers are built in order to take full advantage of that land. Most government institutions, businesses, stadiums, and restaurants chose this area to build on due to its accessibility.
2. Zone of Transition- the zone of transition contains industry and has poorer-quality housing available. Immigrants, as well as single individuals, tend to live in this area in small dwelling units, frequently created by subdividing larger houses into apartments. Most people in this area rent.
3. Zone of the working class- This area contains modest older houses occupied by stable, working class families. A large percentage of the people in this area rent.

Middle Class Residential

• More desirable area because it is further from industry and pollution
• Access to transportation lines for working people who work in the CBD, making transport easier
• Largest residential area High Class Residential
• Housing on outermost edge
• Furthest away from industry
• Quiet, clean, less traffic
• Corridor or spine extending from CBD to edge has best housing. Where it does and doesn’t apply (some weaknesses)
• Applies well to Chicago
• Low cost housing is near industry and transportation proving Hoyt’s model
• Theory based on 20th century and does not take into account cars which make commerce easier
• With cars, people can live anywhere and further from the city and still travel to the CBD using their car. Not only do high-class residents have cars, but also middle and lower class people may have cars. Multiple Nuclei By: Joseph Park on: Mon 26 of April, 2010 00:03 CDT (56165 Reads) Definition:

• Multiple-Nuclei model is a model of urban land use in which a city grows from several independent points rather than from one central business district. Each point acts as a growth center from a particular kind of land use, such as industry, retail, or high-quality housing. As these expand, they merge to form a single urban area. The CBD is not the only generator of change.
• Some centers or nodes include: o ports, o universities, o airports, o parks, o neighborhood business centers. This model, unlike others, takes into account the varied factors of decentralization in the structure of the North American city. The multiple-nuclei theory was formed based on the idea that people have greater movement due to increased car ownership. This increase of movement allows for the specialization of regional centers (eg. heavy industry,

business park). A term for the specialization of regional centers would a node. There is no clear CBD in this type of model. The distant decay theory is still applicable to this model. Land value and population density decline with distance from the central places. Difference among Concentric, Sector and Multiple nuclei models

1. monocentric – concentric, sector model; polycentric – multiple nuclei
2. multiple nuclei more complex in term of land use zones, e.g. industrial suburbs
3. multiple nuclei allows the suburbanization, transport development, outward growth of city
4. multiple nuclei model gives the idea of land use pattern of a city only Criticisms about the Multiple nuclei model
5. Negligence of height of buildings.
6. Non-existence of abrupt divisions between zones.
7. Each zone displays a significant degree of internal heterogeneity and not homogeneity.
8. Unawareness of inertia forces.
9. No consideration of influence of physical relief and government policy.
10. The concepts may not be totally applicable to oriental cities with different cultural, economic and political backgrounds. Urban Realms Model By: Lewis Historical Society Urban Realms Model Each realm is a separate economic, social and political entity that is linked together to form a larger metro framework. Main issue to note with this model is that the city has been decentralized and that edge cities are now the center of realms which surround the city. The main CBD is no longer as influential as it once was. Know what an edge city is to fully understand this model. The creator of the theory of urban realms was James E. Vance Jr., and he created it in the 1960’s. Now urban realms have become, so large they even have exurbs, not just suburbs. Exurbs are suburbs that are, so far away from a city they really can’t be called suburbs any more. The model works extremely well wit the San Francisco Bay area, because it is where Vance came up with the model for it. The city this worst applies to is to Phoenix, Arizona, because the city just sprawls, with very bad development, and shows a lot of characteristics of urban sprawl. a. Vance developed the urban realms model from his observation of the San Francisco Bay area and its sprawling metropolis.

mostly shantytowns. Lawless barrios /favelas and is usually behind a main ring highway known as a periferico. Gentrification : A process of converting an urban neighborhood from a predominantly low income renter-occupied area to a predominantly middle to upper-middle class owner-occupied area. Disamenity : Contains relatively unchanging slums (barrios or favelas) that may not be connected to regular city services. Outside the CBD, the dominant component is a commercial spine surrounded by the elite residential sector These two zones are interrelated and called the spine/sector Essentially an extension of the CBD down a major boulevard Here are the city’s important amenities — parks, theaters, restaurants, and even golf courses Strict zoning and land controls ensure continuation of these activities, protecting elite from incursions by low-income squatters - Note: zoning does not usually occur in these cities excepting in the elite areas Inner-city zone of maturity Less prestigious collection of traditional colonial homes and upgraded self-built homes Homes occupied by people unable to participate in the spine/sector Area of upward mobility - parts of it may be gentrifying Zone of accretion Diverse collection of housing types, sizes, and quality Transition between zone of maturity and next zone Area of ongoing construction and change Some neighborhoods have city-provided utilities Other blocks must rely on water and butane delivery trucks for essential services Zone of peripheral squatter settlements Where most recent migrants are found Fringe contrasts with affluent and comfortable suburbs that ring North American cities Houses often built from scavenged materials Gives the appearance of a refugee camp Surrounded by landscape bare of vegetation that was cut for fuel and building materials Streets unpaved, open trenches carry wastes, residents carry water from long distances, electricity is often “pirated” Residents who work have a long commute Many are transformed through time into permanent neighborhoods Note: This model makes sense when you think about it.

• The larger poor areas reflect the influx of intraregional migrants (rural moving to urban areas)
• The industry in the city and even entering into the city to the core reflects the economic strength of many of these peripheral countries that now take on industrial work.
• the gentrification and middle class areas as well as the elite reflect an economy that is improving or allowing some to rise up (not what we see in the African City Model).
• Industry is on the opposite side of the elite
• the middle class are next to the elite separating them from the poor
• disamenity can reach all the way to the core but tends to stick to the outside
• gentrification is more likely near the CBD and elite area
• model created by Griffin and Ford and sometimes called that (Griffin-Ford Model)
• Physical geography could also influence the distribution of classes like in Rio, where residents were attracted to the neighborhoods that had nice views of the Atlantic Ocean and beaches.

African City Model FV

By: System Administrator The Sub-Saharan? African City Model is also called the De Blij Model because De Blij, a famous geographer, created this. The tropics of Africa remain under forty percent urbanized and outside this area, the remaining regions are about fifty-seven percent urban. Africa has the world’s fastest growing cities, and the impact that European Colonialism has had is clearly evident. The Europeans created prominent urban centers including ports along the coast. Africa also has certain cities that are neither traditional nor colonial such as South Africa’s major urban centers that are mostly Western, with elements of European and American models, including high- rise central business districts and suburbs. Due to the diversity of its cities, it is complicated to develop an African City Model. The central city is found to have three central business districts (CBDs): a remnant of the colonial CBD, an informal and periodic market zone, and a transitional business center where commerce happens from the curbside or storefronts. The former colonial CBD has vertical development, the traditional business center is usually a zone of single-story buildings with a touch of traditional architecture, and the market zone is open-air, informal (economically), and yet important. Sector development is the encircling zone of ethnic and mixed neighborhoods, in which people have strong ethnic identities. Mining and manufacturing zones are found next to some parts of these ethnic neighborhoods. On the outermost part of many African cities, there are informal satellite townships, which are squatter settlements. These squatter settlements consist of poor neighborhoods, or shantytowns, in which people make home anywhere that is possible or open, no matter if it is public or private. Note:

• this reflects the nature of Africa's development. Of the three CBDs, the colonial reflects the past
• the mining and manufacturing areas reflect the nature ofthe types of jobs found in African cities
• the lack of an mentioned areas of elite, middle-class and gentrification tells something as well
• the small colonial CBD reflects a lack of development since that is the area of the formal economy and TNCs (transnational corps)
• the ethnic hoods reflect the tribalism that exists
• the informal satellite townships means the poor who have moved in close to the city
• the lack of any other class getting mentioned reflects the poverty of the area

rapidly, aspects of the city are subject to change. However, as the city continues to develop, it is likely that the middle-class region will expand.

• It is also important to note that the Southeast Asian City model does not explain why the areas were formed but rather points out trends and patterns. Examples of the model: Kuala Lampur, Malaysia Jakarta, Indonesia Gravity Model By: Sugrue and Wilcek on: Mon 26 of April, 2010 00:28 CDT (11687 Reads) Gravity Model Wiki The Gravity Model holds that the potential use of a service at a particular location is directly related to the number of people in a location and inversely related to the distance people must travel to reach the service. Main Points Right Here According to the Gravity Model, consumer behavior reflects two patterns: 1.The greater the number of people living in a particular place, the greater is the number of potential customers for a service. A city block or apartment building that contains 100 families will generate more customers than a house containing only one family. 2.The farther people are from a particular service, the less likely they are to use it. People who live 1 kilometer from a store are more likely to patronize it than people who live 10 kilometer away. In other words, cities, countries or regions or other things that have higher numbers of people and are close together are more likely to interact Small cities or countries with low populations that are further away are less likely to interact. So China and the US interact because, even though they are further apart, they are both large The US has perhaps the most interaction with Mexico because both countries are large and close together Whereas Nepal probably does not interact with Paraguay as they are both small and far away. You do this same thing with big and small cities Best Location in a Nonlinear Settlement
• Most settlements are more complex than a single main street. Geographers still apply the gravity model to find the best location, following these steps: 1.Identify a possible site for a new service. 2.Within the range of the service, identify where every potential user lives.

3.Measure the distance from the possible site of the new service to every potential user. 4.Divide each potential user by the distance to the potential site for the service. 5.Sum all of the results of potential users divided by distances. 6.Select a second possible location for the new service, and repeat steps 2, 3, 4, and 5. 7.Compare the results of step 5 for all possible sites. The site with the highest score has the highest potential number of users and is therefore the optimal location for the service. While the gravity model was created to anticipate migration between cities (and we can expect that more people migrate between LA and NYC than between El Paso and Tucson), it can also be used to anticipate the traffic between two places, the number of telephone calls, the transportation of goods and mail, and other types of movement between places. The gravity model can also be used to compare the gravitational attraction between two continents, two countries, two states, two counties, or even two neighborhoods within the same city. Opponents of the gravity model explain that it can not be confirmed scientifically, that it's only based on observation. They also state that the gravity model is an unfair method of predicting movement because its biased toward historic ties and toward the largest population centers. Thus, it can be used to perpetuate the status quo. The Gravity Model, based off of Newton’s Law of Gravity, is used to measure the movement of ideas and people between two places. In this model distance between two areas and their population sizes are taken into consideration. There is a general “formula” used when determining the “gravitational pull” a city has. Population of area 1 x Population of area 2 Distance^ Things such as employment, wages, settlement locations, traffic, trade, migration, and other ideas can be discovered using this model. A downside and often criticism of this model is that there technically is no theoretical support, it is merely an observation. Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation is a variation of this theory/model. Reilly used this model in order to establish the hinterland around a city. For example, the hinterland of two cities of the same size would have a trade area boundary exactly in the middle of each city. In other cases, the smaller the city, the closer the hinterland. The boundary between both cities is known as the breaking point. At this point, half of the populations shop in either city. Faults related to this model, as with many others, are its assumptions. Reilly’s assumptions include a land void of any geographical variances, consumer preferences; political boundaries that effect an individuals “progress” towards a city. Distance decay is directly relatable to this model and law. Distance decay states that the further away two cities or ideas are, the less likely they are to interact and move.