



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The significance and challenges of juvenile migration in amphibians, focusing on the direct and indirect effects of habitat alteration and connectivity. The study covers various aspects of amphibian life cycles, migration distances, and habitat choices, as well as the impact of land-use changes on populations. The document also discusses the importance of maintaining connectivity between aquatic and terrestrial habitats for population viability.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Betsie B. Rothermel The Center of Excellence for Field Biology Austin Peay State University
Background – life history, definitions, migratory events in life cycle
Juvenile emigration – a critical migratory event?
Direct effects on migratory success – habitat alteration and importance of connectivity
Indirect effects on migratory success– carryover effects from one stage to another
Egg and larval development in aquatic habitats ( Ambystoma, Bufo, Hyla, Rana )
Most of life is spent on land
Juvenile stage often lasts 2-3 years
Some species require specific terrestrial habitats during nonbreeding season
Homing – navigation to a familiar home range
Returning to breeding pond every year (or following a displacement)
Migration – round-trip, seasonal movements between habitats ( within a population )
Annual breeding migrations of adults
Dispersal – one-way, usually once-in-a-lifetime movements ( between populations )
Permanent movement away from natal pond
dispersal
migration
AMPHIBIAN METAPOPULATION
Egg
Larva Metamorph
| ---------------------- AQUATIC ------------------------ | ------- TERRESTRIAL ------- |
Paedomorph
Nonbreeding Adult
Juvenile
Breeding Adult
Dispersers
1
2
3
4
5
AMPHIBIAN LIFE CYCLE
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance to nearest forest (m)
Predicted probability of recapture
at forest edge
Spotted salamanders American toads
Rothermel 2004
NSF Collaborative Study 2003-
University of Maine M. L. Hunter
University of Missouri R. D. Semlitsch, PI
University of Georgia - SREL J. W. Gibbons, B. B. Rothermel
SUNY ESF J. P. Gibbs
Clearcut CWD Removed
Clearcut CWD Retained
Control
Thinning
acres
Spring 2004
50 m 100 m 150 m
0
0.
0.
0.
Bay 37 Bay 5148 Bay 1000 Bay 119
Forest (^189 21 216) Clearcut 238
Proportion of total captures at site 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Initial One month Two months
Mean number of surviving toads
Forest Clearcut
Captures of juvenile toads in drift fences
Survival of juvenile toads in enclosures
Todd & Rothermel 2006
Photo: J.D. Willson
Disturbed/open habitats = barriers to movement due to:
Other potential risks:
**Connectivity may be constrained more by migratory ability of juveniles than that of adults
Maintaining connectivity between aquatic/terrestrial habitats is critical to population viability
Semlitsch & Bodie 2003
what happens during dispersal?
during migratory events?
postmetamorphic migration?
migratory success
FundingFunding:
ASIH (Gaige Award)
U. S. Forest Service, North Central Research Station
NSF (DEB Award 0242874) and SREL (Financial Assistance Award DE-FC09-96SR18-546 to University of Georgia from the U.S. Department of Energy)
CollaboratorsCollaborators: Ray Semlitsch (Ph.D. advisor), Whit Gibbons (Postdoc advisor), Tracy Green Rittenhouse, Michelle Boone, Brian Todd
Field & Lab AssistanceField & Lab Assistance: B. Bennitt, J. Deters, M. Doyle, C. Mank, N. Mills, L. Murray, A. Nold, S. Rothermel, and Z. Slinker
Acknowledgements