


















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An analysis of the worldwide operations of U.S. multinational companies (MNCs) in 2008, focusing on value added, employment, U.S. trade in goods, and R&D. The report includes statistics on U.S. parents, foreign affiliates, and intra-MNC trade.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 26
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
By Kevin B. Barefoot and Raymond J. Mataloni Jr.
ALUE ADDED and employment of U.S. multina
tional companies (MNCs) decreased in 2008, re
flecting divergent changes in their U.S. domestic and
foreign operations, according to preliminary results
from the annual survey of U.S. direct investment
abroad conducted by the Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA).^1 The worldwide current-dollar value added of
U.S. MNCs—the combined value added of U.S. parent
companies and their majority-owned foreign affiliates
(hereafter, “foreign affiliates”)—decreased 1.8 percent;
value added of U.S. parents decreased 6.5 percent, and
value added of their foreign affiliates increased 9.1 per
cent (table 1). The worldwide employment of U.S.
MNCs decreased 0.5 percent; employment of U.S. par
ents decreased 1.5 percent, and employment of foreign
affiliates increased 1.9 percent.
In real terms, decreases in the value added of U.S.
MNCs appear to have been widespread by area and by
industry. In the United States, the real value added of
U.S. parents probably declined faster than the 6.5 per
cent decrease in current dollars because average U.S.
prices continued to rise in 2008. Abroad, the real value
added of foreign affiliates in manufacturing decreased
4.8 percent. Real value added of foreign affiliates in
non-manufacturing industries is not estimated by
BEA, but the available evidence on prices and exchange
rates suggests that this is the only major segment of the
U.S.-MNC universe that experienced real growth in
U.S. MNCs were disproportionately negatively af
fected by the global financial crisis and economic
downturn because of their industrial and geographic
concentrations. Two industries that were among those
most strongly affected by the downturn, manufactur
ing and finance and insurance, accounted for a rela
tively high share of value added of U.S. MNCs.
Automobile manufacturing was particularly affected as
automobile sales fell both in the United States and in
several countries where U.S. MNCs have major opera
tions. Geographically, the United States and other
member countries of the Organisation for Economic
Co-Operation and Development accounted for over 90
percent of the value added of U.S. MNCs worldwide in
2008, but economic growth rates in these countries
were slower, on average, than those in other countries.
In contrast, U.S. MNCs in certain other industries
and geographic areas experienced strong growth in
value added of parents and affiliates both displayed
strong increases. In that industry, MNC value added
Table 1. Selected Statistics for U.S. Multinational Companies, U.S.
Parents, and Foreign Affiliates, 2007–
Value added Number of employees
Billions of dollars (^) Percent change
Thousands (^) Percent
2007 2008 2007 2008 change
U.S. multinational companies ............. Bank 1 .......................................... Nonbank ..................................... Parents ........................................... Bank ........................................... Nonbank ..................................... Majority-owned foreign affiliates ..... Bank 2 .......................................... Nonbank .....................................
206 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
increased 25 percent, as a sharp increase in the price of
crude oil did not result in a significant decrease in
worldwide production or consumption of petroleum
products.^2 By country, employment and value added
of foreign affiliates in emerging markets—such as Bra
zil, Russia, India, and China, known collectively as the
BRIC countries—grew rapidly, buoyed by continued
strong economic growth.
Beginning with the 2007 survey, whose results were
published last year, BEA has collected data on both
bank and nonbank U.S. MNCs in its annual surveys
(previously, only data for nonbank MNCs were col
lected). The new survey data indicate that the value
added of bank MNCs decreased 5.0 percent to $188.
billion, while that by nonbank MNCs decreased 1.
percent to $3,608.1 billion. The remainder of the arti
cle will generally focus on nonbank MNCs because
208 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
added of affiliates that were newly acquired or
established (chart 1).
● U.S. MNCs continued to account for a large share of
the U.S. trade in goods. Trade associated with U.S.
parents or their foreign affiliates accounted for 46.
percent, or $595.6 billion, of total U.S. exports of
goods and for over a third, or $768.1 billion, of total
U.S. imports of goods.
● Nonbank U.S. parents acquired or established 300
nonbank foreign affiliates, which had a combined
value added of $6.4 billion and a combined employ-
ment of 120,600 workers. This was a notable
decrease from 2007 when 434 new affiliates were
acquired or established, which may have reflected
MNCs’ budget constraints and weak consumer
demand related to the global financial crisis and
economic downturn.
● U.S. MNCs’ expenditures for research and develop-
ment (R&D) totaled $236.1 billion. U.S. parents
accounted for about 85 percent of the total; how-
ever, R&D expenditures by foreign affiliates grew
strongly.
● The combined value added of foreign affiliates in
Brazil, Russia, India, and China increased by about
25 percent to $83.9 billion. This continued a period
of rapid growth in value added of affiliates in these
countries, which increased their share of the value
added of foreign affiliates worldwide from 4.4 per-
cent in 2004 to 6.9 percent in 2008. The growth
likely was stimulated by various steps taken by the
governments of these countries to improve their
business climate, as well as the emergence of a grow-
ing middle class, which has created local demand
for the types of goods and services produced by
MNCs. In 2008, the great majority of total sales by
affiliates in these countries were to local customers.
● U.S. MNCs with operations in many countries had
higher labor productivity than those with opera-
tions in only a few countries. U.S. parents with for-
eign affiliates in 10 or more countries had an
average value added per employee of $154,000,
compared with an average of $100,000 for U.S. par-
ents with foreign affiliates in a single country.
Research suggests that the parents with higher labor
productivity earn higher profits, which allows them
to operate profitably in a wide range of foreign
countries, including those with challenging foreign
business climates; see the box “Global Scope and
Productivity.”
An improvement introduced with the 2008 survey
results is an expansion from 27 to 29 in the number of
countries for which separate estimates of the real value
added of foreign affiliates in manufacturing are avail-
able. The two host countries that have been added,
China and Singapore, together accounted for 8.8 per-
cent of the real value added of manufacturing affiliates
in the reference year (2005), raising the share for which
country-level detail is available from 75.0 percent to
83.8 percent of the global total. The new estimates in-
dicate that the real value added of manufacturing affil-
iates in China increased at a double-digit rate in 2008,
while that of affiliates in Singapore declined (see “Real
value added in manufacturing” on page 217).
The remainder of this article examines worldwide
operations of U.S. MNCs, operations of U.S. parents,
and operations of their foreign affiliates.
Worldwide Operations of U.S. MNCs
This section examines the 2008 worldwide operations
of U.S. MNCs in all industries as well as the 2008
change in four aspects of the worldwide operations of
nonbank U.S. MNCs: value added, employment, U.S.
trade in goods, and R&D.
August 2010 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 209
Chart 1. Value Added and Change in Value Added of Nonbank MNCs by Country in 2008
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
August 2010 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 211
U.S. MNCs in all industries
Current-dollar value added of U.S. MNCs in all indus
tries decreased 1.8 percent in 2008 to $3,796.3 billion.
Value added of U.S. MNCs in banking (that is, MNCs
for which the U.S. parent is in banking) decreased 5.
percent to $188.2 billion, and that of nonbank U.S.
MNCs decreased 1.6 percent to $3,608.1 billion. Em
ployment by U.S. MNCs in all industries decreased 0.
percent to 33.0 million workers. Employment of U.S.
MNCs in banking increased 11.0 percent to 1.8 million
workers, and that of nonbank U.S. MNCs decreased
1.1 percent to 31.2 million workers. Much of the in
crease in employment in banking and the decrease in
employment in nonbank industries resulted from the
reclassification of some large, diversified U.S. financial
firms to banking from nonbanking because their U.S.
parent companies became bank holding companies in
2008.^4
Nonbank U.S. MNCs
In current dollars, the value added of nonbank U.S.
MNCs decreased 1.6 percent in 2008 to $3,608.1 bil
lion (table 3). The value added of U.S. parents de
creased 6.0 percent to $2,396.3 billion, and the value
added of foreign affiliates in U.S. dollars increased 8.
percent to $1,211.9 billion.
The real value added of parents probably declined
faster than the 6.0 percent decrease in current dollars
because average U.S. prices continued to rise at a rate
of 1.5 percent in 2008 (as measured by the implicit
Table 3. Value Added of Nonbank U.S. Multinational Companies, by
Industry of Parent, 2007 and 2008
2007 2008 Change Percentchange
All industries........................................................ 3,668,153 3,608,142 –60,011 –1. Mining.............................................................................. 103,662 129,355 25,693 24. Utilities............................................................................. 83,674 77,486 –6,188 –7. Manufacturing.................................................................. 1,769,210 1,751,719 –17,491 –1. Of which: Food ............................................................................ 110,795 113,239 2,444 2. Chemicals ................................................................... 304,000 322,417 18,417 6. Primary and fabricated metals .................................... 72,938 67,275 –5,663 –7. Machinery ................................................................... 100,396 102,218 1,822 1. Computers and electronic products ............................ 180,589 189,924 9,335 5. Electrical equipment, appliances, and components .... 36,359 39,092 2,733 7. Transportation equipment............................................ 310,306 289,662 –20,644 –6. Wholesale trade .............................................................. 182,282 190,842 8,560 4. Information ...................................................................... 369,623 348,410 –21,213 –5. Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance .. 291,150 194,368 –96,782 –33. Professional, scientific, and technical services ............... 213,491 226,344 12,853 6. Other industries............................................................... 655,060 689,617 34,557 5.
price deflator for value added of U.S nonfarm busi
nesses). The available evidence on changes in prices
and exchange rates suggests that the real value added of
foreign affiliates increased in 2008. The 8.2 percent in
crease in their current dollar value added exceeded the
increase that could be attributed to the combined ef
fects of the 2.9 percent average rate of inflation in host
countries and the 2.0 percent depreciation of the dollar
against major foreign currencies.^5 Estimates of real
value added for foreign affiliates in manufacturing pre
sented later in this article show a drop of 4.8 percent,
indicating that the increase for affiliates was in non-
manufacturing industries.
In 2008, employment by nonbank U.S. MNCs de
creased 1.1 percent to 31.2 million workers, reflecting
partly offsetting changes for U.S. parents and foreign
affiliates. The employment by U.S. parents decreased
2.1 percent to 21.1 million; the largest decreases were
in “other industries,” in manufacturing, and in non
bank finance and insurance. The decrease in “other in
dustries” was concentrated in “administration,
support, and waste management” (mainly temporary
employment services); the decrease in manufacturing
was largest in transportation equipment, mainly motor
vehicles; and the decrease in nonbank finance and in
surance was concentrated in nonbank finance. The 2.
percent decrease in parent employment, which mainly
reflected decreases by companies that were parents in
both 2007 and 2008, was greater than the 0.6 percent
decrease in employment for all U.S. private nonbank
industries.
Employment by foreign affiliates increased 1.1 per
cent to 10.1 million. By area, the largest increases in
level were in Asia and Pacific (mainly China and In
dia). By industry, the largest increases were in “other
industries” (mainly retail trade and “accommodation
and food services”) and “professional, scientific, and
technical services.”
In 2008, U.S. exports of goods that involved nonbank
U.S. parents or their majority-owned or minority-
owned nonbank foreign affiliates—MNC-associated
212 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
exports—increased 6.4 percent to $595.6 billion (table
4). The increase in exports of goods by all U.S. busi
nesses was nearly twice as large (12.1 percent); as a re
sult, the MNC-associated share of total U.S. exports of
goods decreased, falling to 46.3 percent in 2008. The
MNC-associated share of total U.S. exports of goods
has been declining in recent years, falling 16.2 percent
age points over the last decade.
MNC-associated imports of goods increased 6.
percent to $768.1 billion in 2008. The increase was
similar to that in total U.S. imports of goods (7.5 per
cent). As a result, the MNC-associated share of total
U.S. imports of goods remained essentially unchanged,
at 36.5 percent, in 2008. Over the last decade, the
MNC-associated share of total U.S. imports of goods
has decreased slightly, declining 1.4 percentage points.
The increase in MNC-associated exports of goods in
2008 reflected increases in both trade between U.S.
parents and their foreign affiliates (intra-MNC trade)
and trade between U.S. MNCs and “others” (trade be
tween U.S. parent companies and foreigners other than
Table 4. U.S. Trade in Goods Associated with
Nonbank U.S. MNCs, 2007 and 2008
MNC-associated U.S. exports, total ............................................................. 559,984 595, Intra-MNC trade ........................................................................................... 214,051 227, Shipped by U.S. parents to their MOFAs ................................................. 203,949 215, Shipped by U.S. parents to their other foreign affiliates 1 .......................... 10,102 12, MNC trade with others ................................................................................. 345,932 367, Shipped by U.S. parents to foreigners other than their own affiliates ...... Of which:
Shipped by U.S. parents to their foreign parent groups 2 .................. Shipped to foreign affiliates by U.S. persons other than their own
parents................................................................................................. 42,096 44, To MOFAs ............................................................................................ 42,000 44, To other foreign affiliates^3 ..................................................................... 96 n.a. MNC-associated U.S. imports, total ............................................................. 720,779 768, Intra-MNC trade ........................................................................................... 267,376 276, Shipped by MOFAs to their U.S. parents ................................................. 253,125 262, Shipped by other foreign affiliates to their U.S. parents 1 .......................... 14,251 13,
MNC trade with others ................................................................................. 453,403 492, Shipped to U.S. parents by foreigners other than their own affiliates ...... Of which:
Shipped to U.S. parents by their foreign parent groups 2 .................. Shipped by foreign affiliates to U.S. persons other than their own
parents................................................................................................. 56,527 60, By MOFAs............................................................................................ 51,523 55, By other foreign affiliates ..................................................................... Addenda:
All U.S. exports of goods.................................................................................. 1,148,199 1,287, U.S.-MNC-associated U.S. exports as a percentage of total ....................... 48.8 46. Intra-U.S.-MNC exports as a percentage of total ......................................... 18.6 17. All U.S. imports of goods ................................................................................. 1,956,962 2,103, U.S.-MNC-associated U.S. imports as a percentage of total ....................... 36.8 36. Intra-U.S.-MNC imports as a percentage of total......................................... 13.7 13.
their own affiliates and trade between foreign affiliates
and U.S. residents other than their own parents). Ex
ports by U.S. parents to their foreign affiliates in
creased 6.4 percent to $227.7 billion (chart 2), and U.S.
exports between U.S. MNCs and others also increased
6.4 percent to $367.9 billion. By industry of foreign af
filiate, the largest increase in intra-MNC exports was
to affiliates in wholesale trade. By industry of U.S. par
ent, the largest increase in exports between U.S. MNCs
and others was by parents in manufacturing and
wholesale trade.
The increase in MNC-associated imports of goods
reflected increases in both imports shipped by foreign
affiliates to their U.S. parents (intra-MNC trade) and
U.S. MNC trade with others. Imports by U.S. parents
from their foreign affiliates increased 3.3 percent to
$276.1 billion, and U.S. imports between U.S. MNCs
and others increased 8.5 percent to $492.0 billion. By
industry of foreign affiliate, the largest increases in in-
tra-MNC U.S. imports were shipped by affiliates in oil
and gas extraction and in petroleum and coal products
manufacturing. By industry of U.S. parent, the largest
increase in imports between U.S. MNCs and others
was to parents in petroleum and coal products manu
facturing.
Expenditures for R&D performed by nonbank U.S.
MNCs decreased 0.9 percent to $236.1 billion in 2008
(table 5). Expenditures by U.S. parents decreased 2.
percent to $199.1 billion, whereas expenditures by for
eign affiliates increased 7.4 percent to $37.0 billion. As
a result, the parent share of worldwide R&D by U.S.
MNCs fell from 86 percent to 84 percent. The decrease
was most pronounced in computers and electronic
products and in chemicals.
The 0.9 percent decrease in R&D by U.S. MNCs was
Table 5. Research and Development Performed by Nonbank U.S.
Multinational Companies by Industry of Parent, 2007–
2007 2008 Change
Percent change
All industries ............................................................ 238,124 236,096 –2,028 –0. Mining .................................................................................. 707 796 89 12. Utilities ................................................................................. 29 17 –12 –41. Manufacturing ...................................................................... 188,898 183,933 –4,965 –2. Of which: Food................................................................................. 2,399 2,265 –134 –5. Chemicals........................................................................ 60,980 59,748 –1,232 –2. Primary and fabricated metals......................................... 1,277 1,409 132 10. Machinery ........................................................................ 8,545 9,383 838 9. Computers and electronic products................................. 46,672 44,450 –2,222 –4. Electrical equipment, appliances, and components......... 2,337 2,652 315 13. Transportation equipment ................................................ 53,765 51,465 –2,300 –4. Wholesale trade................................................................... 6,266 6,890 624 10. Information........................................................................... 20,146 20,738 592 2. Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance....... 180 109 –71 –39. Professional, scientific, and technical services.................... 17,988 18,988 1,000 5. Other industries ................................................................... 3,828 4,530 702 18.
214 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
million workers. Much of the increase in employment
in banking and the decrease in employment in non
bank industries resulted from the change in the classi
fication of some parent companies as mentioned
earlier.
Nonbank U.S. parents
Value added in nonbank finance and insurance de
clined $83.4 billion or 35.6 percent (table 6). The un
precedented drop in this industry reflected the changes
in the classification of some parent companies as well
as the turmoil created by the financial crisis, which de
pressed asset values, raised uncertainty, and con
strained firms’ financial liquidity.
Value added of parents in manufacturing decreased
$62.9 billion or 6.0 percent in 2008. Decreases were
widespread by manufacturing industry, but they were
largest in petroleum and coal products, transportation
equipment, and paper. In petroleum and coal prod
ucts, value added decreased $31.2 billion or 20.9 per
cent, as market conditions did not allow U.S.
producers to pass on to customers the full value of in
creases in the cost of crude oil. In transportation
equipment, value added decreased $13.9 billion or 6.
percent, primarily reflecting the sharp decline in U.S.
car sales. In paper, value added decreased $6.6 billion
or 19.1 percent, primarily reflecting divestitures by
some U.S. parents and a sharp drop in sales in second
ary lumber operations partly related to a sharp de
crease in U.S. new home starts.
By contrast, value added of parents in mining in
creased $21.8 billion or 33.6 percent, reflecting the
sharp rise in crude oil prices.
The 6.0 percent decrease in current-dollar value
added of nonbank U.S. parents was mostly accounted
Table 6. Value Added of Nonbank U.S. Parent Companies, by Major
Industry, 2007 and 2008
2007 2008 Change Percent change
All industries......................................................... 2,548,433 2,396,288 –152,145 –6. Mining............................................................................... 65,072 86,905 21,833 33. Utilities.............................................................................. 79,605 73,127 –6,478 –8. Manufacturing................................................................... 1,043,919 981,043 –62,876 –6. Of which: Food ............................................................................. 73,155 67,396 –5,759 –7. Paper............................................................................ 34,616 28,015 –6,601 –19. Petroleum and coal products........................................ 149,408 118,175 –31,233 –20. Chemicals .................................................................... 177,366 187,217 9,851 5. Primary and fabricated metals ..................................... 52,375 47,410 –4,965 –9. Machinery..................................................................... 68,126 66,512 –1,614 –2. Computers and electronic products ............................. 113,459 113,586 127 0. Electrical equipment, appliances, and components ..... 24,076 25,969 1,893 7. Transportation equipment............................................. 208,994 195,136 –13,858 –6. Wholesale trade ............................................................... 136,530 137,355 825 0. Information ....................................................................... 310,190 295,728 –14,462 –4. Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance ... 233,957 150,564 –83,393 –35. Professional, scientific, and technical services ................ 150,083 158,196 8,113 5. Other industries................................................................ 529,076 513,370 –15,706 –3.
for by decreased value added of continuing parents (ta
ble 7, line 4). There was also a decrease related to the
departure of U.S. parents that sold or liquidated their
last foreign affiliate (line 5). These decreases were
partly offset by an increase related to unallocated
changes (line 6) and an increase related to the addition
of new parents to the U.S. MNC universe (line 3).
In 2008, expenditures for R&D performed by nonbank
U.S. parents decreased 2.2 percent to $199.1 billion. In
contrast, R&D performed by all U.S. businesses in
creased 5.2 percent; as a result, the parent share of to
tal private R&D performed in the United States
decreased to 70.3 percent in 2008, from 75.6 percent in
2007 (table 8).
The 2.2 percent decline in U.S. parents’ expendi
tures for R&D was less pronounced than the 29.7 per
cent decline in their profit-type return. The
production of intangible assets, which often occurs
through R&D, allows businesses to maintain or im
prove their competitiveness, which is particularly im
portant in international markets. Thus, multinational
companies often attempt to avoid substantial cuts in
R&D spending during difficult economic times even
Table 7. Sources of Change in the Value Added
of Nonbank U.S. Parent Companies
1 2007 level ............................................................................................ 2,548, 2 Total change ........................................................................................ –152, 3 New parents 1 ................................................................................... 1, 4 Changes for continuing parents 2 ..................................................... –131, 5 Parents departing the universe 3 ...................................................... –25, 6 Other changes 4 ................................................................................ 4, 7 2008 level ............................................................................................ 2,396,
Table 8. Research and Development Performed by Nonbank U.S.
Parent Companies and by
All U.S. Businesses, 1997–
Performed by parents
Performed by all U.S. businesses 1
R&D by parents as a percentage of R&D by all U.S. businesses
1997.............................................. 106,800 157,739 67. 1998.............................................. 113,777 169,180 67. 1999.............................................. 126,291 182,711 69. 2000.............................................. 135,467 199,539 67. 2001.............................................. 143,017 198,505 72. 2002.............................................. 136,977 193,868 70. 2003.............................................. 139,884 200,724 69. 2004.............................................. 164,189 208,301 78. 2005.............................................. 177,598 226,159 78. 2006.............................................. 184,428 247,669 74. 2007.............................................. 203,678 269,267 75. 2008.............................................. 199,105 283,238 70.
August 2010 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 215
when their budgets are tight. In addition, much R&D
spending is directed toward long-term projects that
would be inefficient to stop temporarily because of
funding constraints.
Underlying the 2.2 percent decline in expenditures
for R&D performed by U.S. parents were offsetting
changes by industry (table 9). Decreases in R&D were
especially large in manufacturing, down $6.7 billion,
to $152.5 billion. Decreases in computers and elec
tronic products, transportation equipment, and chem
icals mainly reflected divestitures and other
retrenchment in response to weak business conditions.
Increases in R&D were especially large in professional,
scientific, and technical services (primarily computer
systems design and related services).
Operations of Foreign Affiliates
This section examines the 2008 operations of foreign
affiliates in all industries as well as the 2008 change in
two aspects of the operations of nonbank foreign affili
ates of nonbank U.S. parents: value added and research
and development. For nonbank foreign affiliates of
nonbank U.S. parents, it also examines the distribution
by country and by industry of newly acquired or estab
lished affiliates and the affiliates’ shares of host country
GDP. Statistics on other selected aspects of the opera
tions of foreign affiliates—such as assets, employment,
and capital expenditures—are presented in tables 18.
to 20.2.
Foreign affiliates in all industries
Current-dollar value added of foreign affiliates in all
industries increased 9.1 percent in 2008 to $1,267.
billion, in contrast to the 6.5 percent decrease in value
added of U.S. parents. Value added of nonbank affili
ates of nonbank U.S. parents increased 8.2 percent to
$1,211.9 billion, largely reflecting increases in continu-
Table 9. Research and Development Performed by Nonbank U.S.
Parent Companies by Major Industry, 2007 and 2008
2007 2008 Change Percent change
All industries............................................................. 203,678 199,105 –4,573 –2. Mining................................................................................... 644 691 47 7. Utilities.................................................................................. 29 17 –12 –41. Manufacturing....................................................................... 159,182 152,507 –6,675 –4. Of which: Food ............................................................................. 1,862 1,801 –61 –3. Chemicals .................................................................... 51,033 49,077 –1,956 –3. Primary and fabricated metals ..................................... 991 1,101 110 11. Machinery .................................................................... 7,398 8,106 708 9. Computers and electronic products ............................. 41,169 37,472 –3,697 –9. Electrical equipment, appliances, and components..... 2,056 2,301 245 11. Transportation equipment ............................................ 43,543 41,510 –2,033 –4. Wholesale trade ................................................................... 5,876 6,451 575 9. Information ........................................................................... 17,981 18,148 167 0. Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance ....... 180 107 –73 –40. Professional, scientific, and technical services .................... 16,162 17,072 910 5. Other industries.................................................................... 3,623 4,111 488 13.
ing operations. Value added of bank foreign affiliates
increased 32.8 percent to $55.1 billion.
The increase
was primarily accounted for by a $13.6 billion increase
by bank affiliates in the United Kingdom. Employ
ment by affiliates in all industries increased 1.9 percent
to 10.6 million workers. Employment of nonbank af
filiates of nonbank U.S. parents increased 1.1 percent
to 10.1 million workers, and that of bank affiliates in
creased 22.5 percent to 0.4 million workers. The dif
ferences in rates of growth in employment for the two
foreign-affiliate groups partly resulted from the reclas
sification of some U.S. parent companies from non-
banks to banking as mentioned earlier.
Nonbank foreign affiliates of nonbank U.S.
parents
Current-dollar value added of nonbank foreign affili
ates of nonbank U.S. parents increased 8.2 percent to
$1,211.9 billion in 2008. By area, the increases in value
August 2010 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 217
was in mining. “Other industries” (mainly manage
ment of companies and enterprises and retail trade),
manufacturing, and wholesale trade also had increases,
while nonbank finance and insurance and information
both had decreases.
The increase in affiliate value added largely reflected
changes for continuing affiliates (table 11, line 6); in
creases related to unallocated changes (line 8) and the
addition of new affiliates to the U.S. MNC universe
(line 3) were not as large and were partly offset by a de
crease related to the departure of affiliates that were
sold or liquidated (line 7).
Newly acquired or established affiliates. Although
most of the increase in the value added of foreign affil
iates in 2008 resulted from expansions in continuing
affiliates, the addition of affiliates that were newly ac
quired or established during the year also contrib
uted. Data for these affiliates show which U.S. MNCs
have been expanding their operations through new
business enterprises and thus can provide some evi
dence of the countries and industries that have offered
attractive investment opportunities to U.S. MNCs. In
2008, nonbank U.S. parents acquired or established
300 nonbank foreign affiliates, which had a combined
value added of $6.4 billion and a combined employ
ment of 120,600 workers (see table 12 on page 218).
While sizable, this is a notable decrease from 2007,
when nonbank U.S. parents acquired or established
434 nonbank foreign affiliates with a combined value
added of $12.3 billion.
By area, five countries—the United Kingdom,
France, the Netherlands, Germany, and Canada—ac
counted for over 40 percent of the number of new affil
iates in 2008, for over 40 percent of their value added,
and roughly a third of their employment. All five of
these countries are high-income countries, and affili
ates in these countries, except those in the Nether
lands, primarily serve local markets. The BRIC
Table 11. Sources of Change in Value Added of Nonbank
Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates
1 2007 level ....................................................................................................... 1,119, 2 Total change.................................................................................................... 92, 3 New foreign affiliates................................................................................... 6, 4 Acquired by U.S. parents ........................................................................ 2, 5 Established by U.S. parents.................................................................... 3, 6 Changes for continuing affiliates^1 ................................................................ 77, 7 Sales or liquidations of foreign affiliates...................................................... –13, 8 Other changes^2 ........................................................................................... 21, 9 2008 level ....................................................................................................... 1,211,
countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China together
accounted for 8.3 percent of all new affiliates, 6.0 per
cent of new affiliate value added, and 34.5 percent of
new affiliate employment.^10 The large share of total
new employment primarily reflected the labor-inten
sive production technologies used by the manufactur
ing and “professional, scientific, and technical
services” industries in which U.S. MNCs invested in
these countries.
By industry, new manufacturing affiliates accounted
for 27.7 percent of all new affiliates, for 43.1 percent of
their employment, and for 32.8 percent of their value
added. New wholesale trade affiliates accounted for
only 7.7 percent of all new affiliates and 3.1 percent of
their employment, but for 45.7 percent of their value
added.
Affiliate share of host-country GDP. Value added
of foreign affiliates represents these firms’ contribu
tions to their respective host countries’ GDP. Among
the 51 host countries listed in table 13 on page 219, the
share of GDP in 2008 accounted for by nonbank for
eign affiliates of nonbank U.S. parents ranged from
20.8 percent in Ireland to 0.1 percent in Saudi Arabia.
In only 2 of the 51 host countries—Ireland and Sin
gapore—did the value added of foreign affiliates of
U.S. MNCs account for more than 10 percent of GDP.
Seven of the top ten countries with high foreign affili
ate shares of host-country GDP are high income coun
tries, namely Ireland, Singapore, Canada, Norway, the
United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Hong Kong. The
relatively high affiliate shares of host country GDP in
these countries can be traced to some of the following
factors: widespread use of a common language with
the United States, marketing and commercial legal sys
tems similar to those in the United States, favorable in
tellectual property laws, the availability of a skilled
work force, political stability, and low corporate tax
rates.
Despite the rapid growth of foreign affiliates in the
BRIC countries, they combined to account for an aver
age of only 1.0 percent of their collective host coun
tries’ GDP in 2008. This share was little changed from
2007 because the rapid growth in affiliate value added
in 2008 of 24.2 percent did not significantly exceed the
rapid growth in the host countries’ GDP of 21.6 per
cent.
Real value added in manufacturing. In addition to
the current-dollar estimates of value added of foreign
218 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
affiliates, BEA prepares estimates of the real value
added of foreign affiliates in manufacturing that re
move the effects of changes in prices and exchange
rates. These estimates provide more meaningful com
parisons of value added of foreign affiliates across
countries and over time than the current-dollar esti
mates. Comparisons across countries are enhanced
because the estimates in real terms are based on pur
chasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates rather than
on market exchange rates.^11 Comparisons over time
are enhanced because the estimates are denominated
in chained (2005) dollars that account for both
changes in prices and changes in the industry mix of
production by manufacturing affiliates. The real value
added estimates are restricted to manufacturing be
cause the required source data are not available for
other industries.
The real value added of foreign affiliates in manu
facturing decreased 4.8 percent to $439.2 billion in
2008 (see table 14 on page 220). The 29 countries for
which estimates are available accounted for 76.7 per
cent of the total.^12 The real value added of manufac
turing affiliates in these countries decreased 8.
percent to $336.8 billion, in line with a 9.8 percent de
crease in total manufacturing production in these
countries (chart 3). The decreases were widespread
across countries and were largest in the United King
dom, Germany, and Canada. In the United Kingdom,
real value added of foreign affiliates decreased $6.2 bil
lion to $42.5 billion, mainly in transportation equip
ment manufacturing. In Germany, real value added
decreased $3.1 billion to $44.7 billion, mainly in com
puter and electronic products and transportation
Table 12. Newly Acquired or Established Nonbank Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates
by Major Area and Industry of Affiliate, 2007 and 2008
2007 2008
Number of newly acquired or established affiliates Value added(millions^ Number ofemployees
Number of newly acquired or established affiliates Value added(millions employees^ Number of
Total Acquired Established of dollars)^ (thousands)^ Total Acquired Established of dollars)^ (thousands)
Total..................................................................................... 434 201 233 12,250 153.4 300 125 175 6,408 120. By area Canada........................................................................................ 42 23 19 1,249 18.2 19 9 10 678 7. Europe......................................................................................... 245 127 118 6,309 70.0 193 86 107 4,281 50. Latin America and Other Western Hemisphere .......................... 67 18 49 2,194 11.2 40 9 31 94 6. Africa ........................................................................................... 4 2 2 54 2.7 6 2 4 18 3. Middle East.................................................................................. 5 3 2 152 1.6 2 1 1 8 1. Asia and Pacific........................................................................... 71 28 43 2,291 49.7 40 18 22 1,329 51. High-income countries 1 ............................................................... 359 167 192 8,073 93.1 247 96 151 5,562 63. Upper-middle-income countries^1 ................................................. 2 0 2 8 0.1 2 0 2 –12 2. Lower-middle-income-countries 1 ................................................. 30 15 15 2,682 43.5 26 13 13 294 36. Low-income countries^1 ................................................................ 43 19 24 1,487 16.7 26 10 16 566 17.
By industry Mining.......................................................................................... 19 12 7 2,246 5.1 8 4 4 175 3. Utilities......................................................................................... 2 2 0 (D) (D) 1 0 1 (D) (D) Manufacturing.............................................................................. 135 104 31 6,530 66.0 83 60 23 2,104 52. Of which: Food ........................................................................................ 7 2 5 276 5.0 6 6 0 271 9. Chemicals ............................................................................... 54 51 3 648 18.8 22 20 2 989 9. Primary and fabricated metals ................................................ 4 1 3 361 8.0 6 5 1 349 6. Machinery................................................................................ 4 2 2 65 1.6 9 8 1 149 2. Computers and electronic products ........................................ 19 17 2 704 5.4 8 3 5 11 7. Electrical equipment, appliances, and components ................ 4 4 0 87 3.5 10 10 0 225 7. Transportation equipment........................................................ 7 6 1 1,335 8.9 7 2 5 –3 0. Wholesale trade .......................................................................... 28 20 8 692 7.4 23 7 16 2,929 3. Information .................................................................................. 20 11 9 364 4.1 18 10 8 437 8. Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance .............. 45 10 35 922 7.1 28 5 23 14 0. Professional, scientific, and technical services ........................... 15 7 8 (D) (D) 8 0 8 (D) (D) Other industries........................................................................... 170 35 135 1,229 52.6 131 39 92 697 52. Of which: Holding companies.................................................................. 115 19 96 –27 0.0 100 30 70 –395 3.
D Suppressed to avoid disclosure of data of individual companies.
220 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
Offsetting these increases was a decrease in R&D ex
penditures in the United Kingdom, down 14.1 percent
or $0.8 billion. Within the United Kingdom, the de
crease was concentrated in manufacturing, specifically
transportation equipment and chemicals manufactur
ing. There was also a decrease in defense-related R&D,
particularly aerospace.
R&D expenditures in the BRIC countries continued
to grow; the share of affiliate R&D expenditures in
these countries grew to 8.1 percent of total affiliate
R&D in 2008 from 4.1 percent in 2004. The 2008 in
crease was partly due to strong growth in India and
Brazil, both of which experienced double-digit growth
in affiliate R&D. Indian affiliates’ R&D expenditures
increased 52.4 percent or $0.2 billion. By industry, a
large portion of the Indian R&D expenditures were in
computers and electronic products manufacturing and
in professional, scientific, and technical services. The
growth in R&D expenditures by Indian affiliates ap
pears to be driven by the expanded capabilities for
R&D and government support in India, which in
cludes the development of an R&D infrastructure, re
search funding, and increased education for human
resource development.
Brazilian affiliates’ R&D expenditures increased
30.3 percent or $0.2 billion. By industry, a majority of
the Brazilian R&D expenditures were in transportation
equipment and computers and electronic products
manufacturing. The increase in transportation equip
ment reflects a continued emphasis on developing flex
ible fuel vehicles (vehicles that run on more than one
fuel, usually gasoline blended with ethanol), which
currently make up about 75 percent of total produc
tion of light vehicles in Brazil.
By industry sector, the largest increase in R&D ex
penditures was in manufacturing, followed by profes
sional, scientific, and technical services. The increase
in manufacturing reflected sizable growth in comput
ers and electronic products manufacturing in which
R&D increased $1.5 billion and helped offset a notable
decrease in R&D in transportation equipment manu
facturing, which declined $0.5 billion.
Table 14. Real Value Added by Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates in Manufacturing by Country, 1999–
Billions of chained (2005) dollars Share of all-countries total (percent)
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
All countries ................. 395.1 409.5 399.9 406.0 404.8 438.6 435.2 447.9 461.5 439.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100. 29 selected countries 352.7 363.3 355.2 361.8 354.8 376.1 364.7 368.9 366.4 336.8 89.3 88.7 88.8 89.1 87.6 85.8 83.8 82.4 79.4 76. Australia..................... 8.0 9.1 9.2 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.3 7.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1. Austria ....................... 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0. Bulgaria ..................... () 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 () () () () () () 0.1 0.1 () () Canada...................... 60.9 63.3 59.1 57.8 57.4 59.6 49.2 47.8 44.2 41.2 15.4 15.5 14.8 14.2 14.2 13.6 11.3 10.7 9.6 9. China ......................... 8.1 11.0 11.7 13.9 15.9 20.2 26.9 29.2 30.4 33.8 2.1 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.6 6.2 6.5 6.6 7. Czech Republic ......... 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.9 4.0 3.8 4.4 4.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 1. Denmark.................... 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0. Finland....................... 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0. France........................ 27.2 27.0 27.0 26.6 25.8 25.1 25.4 24.3 23.3 21.8 6.9 6.6 6.8 6.6 6.4 5.7 5.8 5.4 5.0 5. Germany.................... 56.8 46.3 45.6 44.5 39.3 47.2 47.1 48.4 47.8 44.7 14.4 11.3 11.4 11.0 9.7 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.4 10. Greece....................... 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0. Hungary..................... 2.1 2.3 2.0 2.7 2.2 1.8 2.4 2.8 4.1 3.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.9 0. Ireland ....................... 14.8 16.7 17.9 23.1 21.3 20.7 21.7 22.8 22.0 20.5 3.7 4.1 4.5 5.7 5.3 4.7 5.0 5.1 4.8 4. Italy............................ 24.3 23.2 24.3 22.8 21.2 20.3 18.8 17.3 16.0 13.9 6.2 5.7 6.1 5.6 5.2 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.5 3. Japan......................... 10.1 14.4 17.7 15.7 15.9 15.3 8.0 8.4 8.5 8.0 2.6 3.5 4.4 3.9 3.9 3.5 1.8 1.9 1.8 1. Lithuania.................... 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 () () Mexico ....................... 23.2 24.2 24.4 25.3 25.8 23.8 22.9 23.8 23.5 22.3 5.9 5.9 6.1 6.2 6.4 5.4 5.3 5.3 5.1 5. Netherlands ............... 15.9 16.1 15.7 16.2 15.1 15.7 17.7 14.9 13.8 13.7 4.0 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.7 3.6 4.1 3.3 3.0 3. Norway ...................... 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.8 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0. Poland ....................... 2.4 4.3 4.9 5.4 6.2 7.4 7.5 8.4 8.6 6.3 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 1. Portugal ..................... 1.6 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.9 1.0 0.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0. Singapore .................. 9.8 14.0 9.5 11.0 13.1 15.2 11.1 15.1 16.2 14.5 2.5 3.4 2.4 2.7 3.2 3.5 2.6 3.4 3.5 3. Slovak Republic ......... 0.3 0.2 1.1 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.0 1.6 0.1 () 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0. Slovenia..................... 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 () () () () () () () 0.1 () (*) South Korea............... 2.4 3.4 3.1 4.4 4.3 5.3 6.0 6.9 7.5 7.2 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1. Spain ......................... 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.0 10.4 10.1 10.4 10.5 11.3 8.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 2. Sweden...................... 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.8 4.9 5.6 4.6 5.1 4.9 3.3 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.1 0. Switzerland................ 3.4 4.1 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.7 4.3 5.5 7.8 7.3 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.7 1. United Kingdom......... 58.2 53.6 50.2 51.4 50.8 51.2 52.5 49.1 48.7 42.5 14.7 13.1 12.6 12.7 12.5 11.7 12.1 11.0 10.6 9. All other countries.......... 43.2 46.7 45.3 44.9 50.3 62.6 70.5 79.1 95.5 103.5 10.9 11.4 11.3 11.1 12.4 14.3 16.2 17.7 20.7 23. Residual^1 ....................... –1.6 0.2 –0.4 –1.7 –1.5 0.0 –0.2 0.5 –0.6 –2. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
August 2010 SURVEY OF CURRENT BUSINESS 221
Table 15. Research and Development Performed by Majority-Owned
Nonbank Foreign Affiliates by Major Area and by Major Industry of
Affiliate, 2007 and 2008
2007 2008 Change
Percent change
All areas, all industries ................................................
By area Canada............................................................................... Europe................................................................................ Of which: France ........................................................................ Germany .................................................................... Netherlands................................................................ Russia ........................................................................ United Kingdom ......................................................... Latin America and Other Western Hemisphere ................. Of which: Brazil .......................................................................... Mexico........................................................................ Africa.................................................................................. Middle East ........................................................................ Asia and Pacific.................................................................. Of which: Australia ......................................................................... China.............................................................................. India ............................................................................... Japan ............................................................................. By industry Mining................................................................................. Utilities................................................................................ Manufacturing..................................................................... Of which: Food ........................................................................... Chemicals .................................................................. Primary and fabricated metals ................................... Machinery .................................................................. Computers and electronic products ........................... Electrical equipment, appliances, and components... Transportation equipment .......................................... Wholesale trade ................................................................. Information ......................................................................... Finance (except depository institutions) and insurance ..... Professional, scientific, and technical services .................. Other industries..................................................................
n.a. 1,
96 336 n.a. 524
n.a.
–6.
–5.
n.a.
–10.
Millions of dollars Thousands of Total employees Sales Net Capital Research and Value Compensation assets Total Goods Services income expenditures development expenditures
Less than $500,000 (+/–). D Suppressed to avoid disclosure of data of individual companies.
- 222 U.S. Multinational Companies August - Table 16.1. Selected Statistics for Nonbank U.S. Parents by Industry of U.S. Parent, - income Investment - All industries 20,271,992 8,593,134 5,635,404 2,560,899 396,831 726,126 495,361 203,678 2,548,433 1,386,455 21,548.
224 U.S. Multinational Companies August 2010
Table 17. Selected Statistics for Nonbank Foreign Affiliates by Country of Affiliate, 2007 and 2008
Millions of dollars
Thousands of employees
Millions of dollars
Thousands of Total assets Sales Net employees income
exports of goods shipped to affiliates
imports of goods shipped by affiliates
Compensation of employees Total assets^ Sales^
Net income
exports of goods shipped to affiliates
imports of goods shipped by affiliates
Compensation of employees
All countries ................................................... 14,449,484 5,522,695 844,721 256,147 323,903 476,824 11,731.9 12,504,725 6,107,864 956,357 269,752 337,057 490,124 11,879. Canada ................................................................ 1,065,258 562,209 53,585 78,036 (D) 54,602 1,114.6 955,514 617,615 66,148 78,100 (D) 55,806 1,082. Europe ................................................................. 9,124,062 2,851,301 451,070 66,780 80,526 277,823 4,811.2 7,419,907 3,147,942 525,813 74,868 83,297 280,524 4,820. Austria.............................................................. (D) (D) (D) 304 373 3,024 40.4 (D) (D) (D) 304 365 3,132 44. Belgium ............................................................ 307,856 126,223 16,410 3,690 (D) 11,553 139.8 341,018 148,235 16,071 4,909 (D) 12,015 140. Czech Republic ................................................ (D) (D) (D) 112 (D) (D) L (D) (D) (D) 165 (D) (D) L Denmark .......................................................... (D) (D) (D) 171 318 (D) L (D) (D) (D) 271 332 (D) L Finland ............................................................. (D) 13,512 1,055 374 265 1,528 24.0 (D) (D) (D) 384 273 1,620 24. France .............................................................. 333,993 227,287 12,694 (D) 6,963 35,443 652.8 352,752 243,870 13,330 (D) 7,942 36,206 636. Germany .......................................................... 629,481 356,354 20,404 8,804 (D) 50,098 684.9 600,177 388,658 21,984 10,720 (D) 51,611 671. Greece ............................................................. (D) (D) (D) 116 4 (D) L (D) (D) (D) 88 (D) (D) L Hungary ........................................................... 41,126 22,446 2,210 222 583 1,592 67.6 38,957 23,425 2,687 173 743 1,663 63. Ireland .............................................................. 539,373 228,141 66,142 4,903 20,864 6,184 95.0 656,134 252,976 80,900 3,073 23,098 6,711 91. Italy .................................................................. 204,563 153,279 10,582 (D) 2,751 14,783 276.2 195,708 163,086 11,819 2,110 2,863 15,395 268. Luxembourg ..................................................... 807,314 15,621 60,811 299 74 1,025 13.4 918,930 18,732 89,926 410 99 1,059 14. Netherlands...................................................... 1,303,499 260,371 113,570 (D) 4,764 15,636 234.5 1,276,966 318,605 147,566 (D) 5,699 17,954 244. Norway ............................................................. 69,274 44,620 4,946 308 817 2,635 34.0 72,870 60,818 8,886 272 828 2,933 35. Poland .............................................................. 32,718 32,435 2,439 313 247 2,629 131.4 35,598 39,734 2,434 316 209 3,269 142. Portugal............................................................ 43,497 13,954 3,412 169 180 (D) K (D) (D) (D) 178 133 (D) L Russia .............................................................. (D) (D) (D) (D) 3 (D) M (D) (D) (D) 1,100 4 (D) M Spain................................................................ 197,117 108,569 10,756 1,201 1,299 11,624 216.8 173,940 114,266 9,939 (D) 1,404 12,209 211. Sweden ............................................................ (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) L (D) (D) (D) 517 (D) (D) L Switzerland ...................................................... 440,678 240,629 49,141 9,284 (D) 8,375 90.4 447,230 280,209 53,398 11,531 (D) 9,020 95. Turkey............................................................... 21,101 26,437 –2,881 (D) (D) 1,528 48.0 19,725 30,556 2,217 (D) 268 1,698 48. United Kingdom ............................................... 3,683,735 681,653 31,243 14,105 14,947 86,554 1,357.8 1,727,600 681,792 9,193 15,985 13,601 78,920 1,328. Other ................................................................ 101,448 44,846 15,818 302 87 2,559 138.8 113,740 55,121 19,943 419 105 3,191 147. Latin America and Other Western Hemisphere 1,922,200 637,048 184,164 54,532 66,785 42,743 2,348.8 1,913,412 691,555 187,832 57,525 68,742 46,758 2,321. South America ................................................. 357,230 261,943 30,646 (D) 5,836 21,253 882.0 341,832 302,615 30,273 11,394 (D) 24,491 909. Argentina...................................................... 44,301 34,003 3,154 1,117 783 2,399 123.5 46,613 42,609 2,874 1,271 1,132 3,008 132. Brazil ............................................................ 175,344 134,513 11,365 4,507 (D) 12,689 484.1 160,699 157,495 13,318 6,034 (D) 14,860 505. Chile............................................................. 37,942 29,189 8,442 714 (D) 1,910 82.2 32,456 29,152 4,303 957 (D) 1,778 76. Colombia...................................................... (D) (D) (D) 1,001 1,060 (D) L (D) (D) (D) (D) 1,299 (D) L Ecuador........................................................ 4,589 3,708 –52 73 (D) 198 11.5 4,118 4,398 200 113 (D) 209 12. Peru ............................................................. 25,554 13,893 2,343 205 (D) 976 42.0 24,136 15,374 1,608 225 (D) 960 39. Venezuela .................................................... (D) 22,758 3,439 (D) 182 1,475 57.2 (D) (D) (D) (D) 104 1,794 58. Other ............................................................ (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) J (D) (D) (D) 369 (D) (D) J Central America ............................................... 261,644 226,690 17,562 43,081 54,762 19,014 1,371.0 251,838 239,951 14,711 43,952 53,243 19,791 1,319. Costa Rica ................................................... (D) (D) (D) 630 1,640 (D) L (D) (D) (D) 508 1,748 (D) K Honduras ..................................................... 2,166 3,781 157 (D) 722 (D) K (D) (D) (D) 939 924 (D) K Mexico.......................................................... 205,177 197,311 13,183 39,264 51,780 16,462 1,154.9 193,682 207,031 10,268 40,262 49,834 17,299 1,107. Panama........................................................ (D) 9,145 3,184 1,063 (D) (D) K (D) 9,520 3,282 1,111 (D) (D) K Other............................................................ 6,619 (D) (D) (D) (D) 578 64.8 6,437 11,415 353 1,132 (D) 646 69. Other Western Hemisphere ............................. 1,303,326 148,415 135,957 (D) 6,188 2,476 95.8 1,319,742 148,989 142,849 2,179 (D) 2,477 92. Barbados...................................................... (D) (D) (D) 117 (D) 75 1.8 (D) (D) (D) 109 188 63 1. Bermuda ...................................................... 742,136 78,915 72,883 452 (D) (D) K 685,213 65,617 66,269 422 (D) (D) K Dominican Republic ..................................... (D) 4,520 324 (D) (D) 315 32.0 (D) 4,678 353 (D) (D) 183 24. United Kingdom Islands, Caribbean ............ 367,987 30,231 39,131 197 (*) 304 6.9 329,460 34,413 49,788 310 167 451 9. Other............................................................ 159,033 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) K 259,206 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) K Africa ................................................................... 166,402 97,335 24,135 1,406 (D) 5,046 212.6 197,015 110,624 42,072 1,412 (D) 5,447 219. Egypt................................................................ 16,377 10,393 1,801 22 (D) 403 35.5 19,373 13,556 2,236 25 3 515 38. Nigeria.............................................................. (D) 17,946 3,891 5 (D) (D) I (D) 20,817 4,226 5 (D) (D) J South Africa ..................................................... 21,972 27,841 3,016 (D) (D) 2,599 84.7 20,679 28,858 2,597 (D) 364 2,568 82. Other ................................................................ (D) 41,154 15,427 (D) 2,367 (D) L (D) 47,393 33,013 (D) 5,600 (D) L Middle East ......................................................... 145,747 95,811 21,971 1,150 2,929 5,557 111.1 160,235 120,970 26,619 1,151 (D) 6,296 122. Israel ................................................................ (D) (D) (D) 198 (D) 3,403 68.3 34,216 (D) (D) 309 1,421 3,899 79. Saudi Arabia .................................................... 23,305 26,737 7,201 179 (D) 897 16.7 21,315 30,596 7,111 102 (D) 959 16. United Arab Emirates....................................... 12,348 19,090 796 (D) (D) 502 10.5 (D) 24,702 1,014 (D) (D) 625 12. Other ................................................................ (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) 754 15.6 (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) 813 14. Asia and Pacific .................................................. 2,025,816 1,278,992 109,795 54,243 61,656 91,054 3,133.6 1,858,643 1,419,158 107,873 56,695 60,749 95,293 3,313. Australia ........................................................... 297,057 158,769 15,515 4,978 2,044 19,179 327.9 280,155 177,554 18,282 5,704 2,947 20,033 322. China................................................................ 129,198 139,407 10,893 4,356 (D) 7,846 788.8 161,987 171,733 12,472 (D) 7,516 10,365 950. Hong Kong ....................................................... 217,601 93,802 10,299 4,922 (D) 5,158 124.4 123,980 89,558 5,588 5,483 (D) (D) M India ................................................................. 49,486 33,215 2,630 621 (D) 4,269 341.2 47,440 41,203 3,058 1,042 (D) 5,346 384. Indonesia ......................................................... 56,159 27,390 6,911 351 (D) 1,646 107.2 54,369 28,023 8,421 540 302 1,599 108. Japan ............................................................... 654,603 298,748 14,277 12,235 6,665 31,628 619.5 595,861 321,119 12,235 12,197 (D) 31,988 583. Korea, Republic of............................................ 99,625 99,558 6,112 (D) 2,983 6,433 120.8 83,849 104,939 5,010 3,084 3,165 6,003 122. Malaysia........................................................... 44,464 48,489 4,680 2,661 (D) 1,743 112.2 44,819 52,151 6,113 (D) 9,670 1,853 107. New Zealand.................................................... 14,731 13,251 671 332 122 1,376 32.2 (D) (D) (D) 441 (D) 1,343 31. Philippines........................................................ 23,871 16,597 1,526 1,439 1,039 1,080 117.9 21,916 16,996 1,751 1,297 811 1,220 126. Singapore......................................................... 254,098 246,454 27,983 (D) (D) 5,406 124.1 250,131 286,667 28,497 (D) (D) 5,714 131. Taiwan .............................................................. 106,444 43,928 3,100 3,482 (D) 2,632 104.5 101,939 44,317 –434 (D) (D) 2,714 102. Thailand ........................................................... 51,049 46,249 3,427 1,543 5,280 1,734 156.4 49,026 52,100 3,688 1,653 7,404 1,887 169. Other ................................................................ 27,430 13,135 1,770 263 3 925 56.6 (D) (D) (D) 302 (D) (D) L Addenda: European Union(27) 1 ....................................... 8,431,301 2,401,246 372,237 56,391 72,342 260,217 4,364.2 6,680,147 2,595,481 430,073 61,447 72,646 260,773 4,331. OPEC 2 ............................................................. 274,187 158,927 40,604 3,096 3,730 6,049 219.6 321,286 197,585 63,814 3,162 (D) 6,893 239.