Download the way to success yours and more Cheat Sheet Law of Torts in PDF only on Docsity!
Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Due Date “Chief Weapons'' to “Rebrand” our Attitudes about Work and create an Inspired and Equitable Society In the United States, poverty and attitudes toward work have been contentious issues for decades. The United States is undoubtedly amid a "quitagion" because of the large number of individuals that resigned in November 2021 alone. In the second half of 2021, an estimated 25 million Americans left their employment; this is almost certainly a tremendous leave rate in U.S. history. Attitude toward work might be connected to job abandonment. Changing attitudes about work contribute to the explanation for the changing demographic makeup of the American labor force. In reaction to a national poverty rate of approximately 19 percent, President Lyndon B. Johnson enacted anti-poverty legislation under the unofficial moniker "war on poverty." His speech on the war on poverty influenced the United States Congress to approve the Economic Opportunity Act, which formed the Office of Economic Opportunity to deal with the local application of federal anti-poverty funding. President L. B. Johnson emphasized the "principal weapons" of the War on Poverty, such as improved health, housing, education, and employment possibilities. Poverty is still prevalent in current culture, yet, embracing President L. B. Johnson's principal weapons may radically change people's attitudes about labor and produce a more motivated and fair civilization. In this respect, the essay aims to describe the "chief weapons"
that might be used in contemporary society to "rebrand" people's attitudes about work and create a society with fairness and equity. According to the studies, many individuals' attitudes towards work and inequality are the underlying cause of their choice to abandon the workforce. Many of the most recent workers to leave their jobs in the United States were in lower-paying positions on the salary scale (Malone 3). These individuals are either working better jobs that pay greater salaries or looking for jobs that pay higher wages due to their ability. Because of the labor market, at minimum, most people with lower incomes have the opportunity to deliberate about their occupations in the same way that the managerial class has much more conventionally thought about their work, namely, as something that should work for them instead of the other way around. Besides those entities attempting to trade their ways into genuinely better employment, many of other employees have left the labor for various reasons, including being unwell, caring for their children, retiring, or just being unhappy in their current positions. To rebrand people's attitudes towards work and build a more motivated and equal society, one of the most chief weapons that can be used is to provide better employment possibilities and working circumstances. It seems that prominent lawyers are abandoning their desire for gunplay in the office. For example, in 2021, Reuters highlighted a startling wave of abrasion at large companies in New York. They claimed that many advocates had elected to accept a wage reduction to work shorter hours, relocate to a region with lower living costs, or work in technology. It is also occurring in the financial sector: An analyst at Citi reportedly stated in a conversation, "I hate this job, I hate this bank, I want to jump out the window," which prompted recruiters to investigate his mental health (Malone 6). He explained it to H.R. by saying, "This is a consensus view." "I think everyone else feels the same way."
a conduit to desirable posts in the administrations of Democratic presidents, threatened to go on strike over their salaries. Some members of Congress's staff have taken the first steps toward organizing themselves into a union. People's views about work may be considerably altered by embracing labor unions and receiving instruction on the significance of their role in the workplace. It would significantly produce a more inspired society. According to Malone (8), "some of the most prestigious offices are organizing, and the college-educated make up a larger slice of the union pie than ever, thanks largely to growth among teachers' unions." it is because teachers' unions have had significant growth in recent years. In a broader sense, the number of people belonging to unions is at an all- time low. The Amazon warehouse workers in Alabama considering joining a union did not do so in the previous year's election. A federal review board concluded that Amazon had unfairly coerced its workers against joining a union. As a result, the board mandated that a new vote be held within the next five weeks. Employees at Amazon may vote to join a union. The staff of Starbucks is also implementing the procedure. Despite this, safeguards in the workplace are still at risk of turning into another luxury good reserved for the rich. People's perspectives on work may be rebranded, and equality can be fostered with the assistance of collective national responsibility, which is a chief weapon. In times of plenty and scarcity, the primary cause of a lack of financial resources for the vast majority of impoverished women is insufficient salaries. The collective national duty in the United States will be essential when addressing the problem of low salaries among women and providing additional options for financial help. "It is time to revive the notion of a collective national responsibility to the poorest among us, who are disproportionately women and especially women of color," Ehrenreich argues, demonstrating the significance of eradicating inequality in the United States (Ehrenreich
4). Until this occurs, people must realize that the impoverished women who clean the workplaces and homes, cook and serve our food, and care for our aging on little pay are the actual philanthropists in our community. Waitressing, hotel housekeeping, and working as an assistant in a nursing home are jobs that pay so low that it is impossible to save more than a few hundred dollars to help someone transfer into a career that pays more. Because they do not provide individuals with a choice over their work schedules, they need help to take on other jobs or make childcare arrangements. Moreover, in numerous occupations, even young women quickly face the physical degradation that comes with work. The government, organizations, and the general public have to address the present atmosphere of anti-ambition. Being ambitious is an essential need of work mythology; thus, this climate of anti-ambition needs to be addressed immediately. It is reasonable to hold a system accountable for contributing to a lack of ambition when that system is rigged against its personnel. The improvement of working conditions, as well as an increase in the incomes of employees would bring about a shift away from the present pessimistic atmosphere. For instance, when companies implement more equitable rules and working hours, they inspire equality and motivation among their employees. It is only fair that the number of hours worked is proportionate to the pay. Better working circumstances will also have a favorable influence on workers' levels of motivation, which is another benefit of these improvements. In conclusion, the fundamental reason many people withdraw from the labor market is their attitude towards work, inequality, and lack of motivation. Since quite some time ago, the problem of lack of motivation, and inequality has been persistent leading to anti-ambition. Anti- ambition may be eradicated by using chief weapons to modify people's views about work and build a more egalitarian and motivating society. Poor working circumstances may be a breeding
Work Cited Ehrenreich, Barbara. “It Is Expensive to Be Poor.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 13 Jan. 2014. Malone, Noreen. The Age of Anti-Ambition, 20 Feb. 2022, pp. 1–9.
