









Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
“All the material in this book not derived from my own observation is either taken from official records or is the result.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 15
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Sub-title significance “A True Account of a Multiple Murder and Its Consequences” How does this title determine what the novel’s focus will be?
Epigraph Freres humains qui apres nous vives, N’ayez les cuers contre nous endurcis, Car, se pitie de nouse povres avez, Dieu en aura plus tost de cous mercis.
Epigraph What is Capote evoking by having this as his epigraph? Why doesn’t he translate it? Why reference a 15 th century song? What attitude does he want readers to have as they start reading his novel? Human brothers who live after us, Do not have (your) hearts hardened against us, For, if you take pity on us poor (fellows), God will sooner have mercy on you.
- Ballade of the hanged
“The Last to See Them Alive” Take an educated guess; what will the first part (74 pages) consist of? Why does Capote title the sections?
What does he emphasize on page one?
Stasis broken – the novel “begins” “Until one morning in mid-November of 1959, few Americans- in fact, few Kansans- had ever heard of Holcomb… At that time not a soul in sleeping Holcomb heard them- four shotgun blasts that, all told, ended six human lives” (Capote 5). How is Capote using juxtaposition? What is he trying to contrast? Make an inference: how do four gun shots end six lives? What is being foreshadowed? How would this be different for his readers who already were familiar with the story from the newspapers?
Things to look out for while reading/annotating… As you read In Cold Blood (and annotate for ethos, pathos, logos), consider why Capote is writing the novel in this specific way. Consider his authorial choices:
The absence of the author “My feeling is that for the nonfiction-novel form to be entirely successful, the author should not appear in the work. Ideally. Once the narrator does appear, he has to appear throughout, all the way down the line, and the I-I-I intrudes when it really shouldn't. I think the single most difficult thing in my book, technically, was to write it without ever appearing myself, and yet, at the same time, create total credibility .” How might this perspective influence the novel? Consider both what will be included, and what will be left out.
Writing In Cold Blood “In 1959, Truman Capote stumbled on a short article in The New York Times about a gruesome quadruple murder at a Kansas farm. He soon realized that it was the story he had been waiting to write for 20 years. When he began writing professionally, Capote, who died 32 years ago today, theorized that journalism and creative writing could come together in the form of what he called the ‘nonfiction novel.’ The subject had to be right, however; with journalism underpinning such a novel, the pitfall was that it could quickly date itself. Crime, he decided, could be the perfect vehicle. ‘The human heart being what it is, murder was a theme not likely to darken and yellow with time,’ he told George Plimpton in a 1966 interview in The New York Times.”