

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
An insightful analysis of the downfall of the once-dominant photography company, kodak. It explores how kodak's failure to adapt to the digital revolution led to its eventual bankruptcy in 2012. The report delves into the factors that contributed to kodak's demise, such as its reluctance to embrace new technologies, its inability to innovate, and its failure to meet the changing needs of its customers. The document serves as a valuable case study for understanding the importance of adaptability and innovation in the face of technological disruption. It offers valuable lessons for businesses and individuals alike, highlighting the need to stay ahead of the curve and continuously evolve to remain competitive in a rapidly changing market.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
The Eastman Kodak Company was founded in 1881 in Rochester, New York by inventor George Eastman and businessman Henry Strong. Eastman had previously founded the Eastman Dry Company, which manufactured photographic plates. The name "Kodak" was invented by Eastman himself, as he wanted a name that was easy to pronounce in all countries and the letter "K" was his favorite.
Kodak quickly became a leader in the photography sector, with a strong market presence in the sale of photographic and video cameras, photographic printing, and the manufacturing of film rolls for both photography and cinema. By 1997, the company's stock market value had reached $30 billion, solidifying its position as a technological giant.
The shift to digital photography, however, proved to be a significant challenge for Kodak. As the general public began to move away from traditional cameras, film, and photographic paper, the company's sales in these areas declined. Kodak's refusal to embrace and adapt to the new digital technologies ultimately led to its downfall.
The company failed to create new forms of market and surprise customers with technological developments. Kodak's management believed the company was unbeatable, but the era of the 2000s proved otherwise, and the company ceased to be one of the technological giants.
After declaring bankruptcy in 2012, Kodak has been undergoing a transformation process in an effort to make a comeback. In 2017, the company attempted to re-enter the market with a smartphone, but the camera element, which was expected to be a strength, did not perform well. In 2018, Kodak launched the Kodak Ektra, a cell phone that offered a unique photography experience in the market, aiming to capture the nostalgia for family photography moments.
The factors that contributed to Kodak's business failure are easy to understand. The company's rejection of digitalization, innovation, and modernization of its products and services led to its downfall. Kodak refused to implement new technologies in its processes, which left it behind in the highly competitive market. Businesses must adapt to new technologies and continuously innovate to meet the changing demands of the market, rather than relying on past successes.
Kodak's story serves as a cautionary tale for businesses that fail to keep up with technological advancements and the evolving needs of their customers. The company's unwillingness to embrace digital photography and innovate its offerings ultimately led to its downfall, despite its once-dominant position in the photography industry. Businesses must be willing to adapt and evolve to stay relevant and competitive in the market.