



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Competitive Advantages in explain Presentation of Theory of porter, the system and factorial determinants and determinants of Diamond.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Paul Laurenţiu FRĂSINEANU, PhD student University of Craiova
Keywords: competitive advantage, diamond, determinants.
Abstract: In this item, we approached one of the new theories of the economic development, the theory of competitive advantage. The theory of competitive advantage was created by Michael E. Porter, starting from the actual economic reality which could no longer be explained on the basis of the model of comparative advantages, elaborated by David Ricardo. In order to conceive this theory, Porter analyzed four years, ten countries with important share in international commerce (Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, Great Britain and USA), establishing the system of the determinants which determine the obtaining of the competitive advantage. Starting from describing the system of the determinants, the so-called “diamond”, we analyzed detailed these determinants of the diamond: the factorial ones, the demand ones, upstream and downstream industries and the domestic competition, and also the chance and the governmental policy. After analyzing and classifying the structure of these determinants, we approach their interaction - the dynamics of the diamond - by identifying the stages of the development which a country goes through and the features of each stage. In the last part of the article, we enumerated the causes that might lead to loosing the competitive advantage and the position as a leader on the market, and a few critics brought to this new theory.
1. The presentation of the theory of Porter The theory of the competitive advantage starts from the principle that the only important concept at the national level is the national productivity (Fota Constantin, 2004). In the elaboration of his theory, Porter starts from the following premises (Porter Michael, 1990):
A) the factorial determinants - the endowment of a country with factors; B) the determinants of the demand - the features of the internal market; C) up and downstream industries; D) the strategy and structure of the companies and the rivalry among them - the domestic competition; These four determinants are considerably influenced by others two factors: the chance and the governmental policy. All these determinants are conditioned one to another. According to Porter, the countries have success „where the national diamond is the most favourable”. The more complex and dynamic the economic environment of the country is, the more like is some companies to fail if they cannot capitalize in an adequat way the requests of this environment. A. The factorial determinants represent the starting point necessary to enter in competition. The classical economic theory identifies the labor, land and capital as the factors of the production. The theory of Porter demonstrates that, even the endowment with factors is obviously important, the critical element for a country to be competitive is to create new factors and to improve the existing ones. The competitive advantage should be created, it is not inherited ( Negriţoiu Mişu, 1997). Porter divides the production factors into the following categories:
The individual motivation of people working in a company is important for improving the professional training for aquiring and maintaing the competitive advantages. The aquirement and maintaing of the competitive advantages are closely linked to the existence of a real and strong competition on the domestic market, which motivates the companies to promote new products on the market and to discover new markets in order to stimulate the growth. The domestic competition has, at least, the same importance as the international competition, the existencxe of many competing companies being favourable as the national companies become as strong as their foreign competitors. The adoption by the government of certain regulations that encourage the establishment of new companies determines the growth of the competition and thus contributes to maintaining the competitive advantage. As we showed earlier, these four determinants of the „diamond” evolve closely with other two factors: the chance and the policy of the government. The chance: Porter noticed that during the evolution of the most industries which got the competitive advantage , a major role had the chance, identified by wars, major changes on the international financial market, changes into the costs of the production factors ( the oil schocks ), political decisions of the foreign governments, pure inventions. The governmental policy can influence the aquirement of the competitive advantage being considered as the most important determinant. This is related to the fact that a government can influence the local market by subventions, investments in education, regulating the domestic market, creating a competitive infrastructure for reducing the accessing costs of the factors. The state is also an important buyer for certain industries, such as defence industry, aeronautics, telecommunications. Important is to approach the system of the competitiveness conditions with a coherent governmental action in order to create or improve the national competitive advantages.
3. The dynamics of the diamond According to Porter, only the countries, that have a functional „diamond” , at which the individual elements are reciprocally positive amplified, have national competitive advantages on long term and in ther turn these facilitate the obtaining of the competitiveness at international level. His opinion on this aspect is that no country is competitive in all fields. Only industries or companies that first, overcame through a strong domestic fight, can create a competitiveness at international level. The national economies go through a few stages of development, stages that reflect both the sources of the advantage of a country in international competition and the nature and the size of the successful industrial branches. Porter identifies four stages of developping the competitive advantages in the evolution of an economy:
primary factors of production. In this stage, the economy of the country is sensitive to the world economic cycles and fluctuation of the exchange rates that determine the demand and the relative prices. In the next stage, of the growth based on investments, the national competitive advantage is based on the desire and capacity of a country and its companies to invest in major way. In the third stage, of the growth based on innovations, the competitive advantages of the country come not only from adapting and improving the technologies and new fabrication methods, but especially from creating new ones. These stages of the competitive economic growth include the continuous improvment of the competitive advantages and are associated with the permanent growth of the economic prosperity. Unlike these stages, the stage of the economic growth based on the national wealth is a stage that leads to decline eventually. An economy based on a wealth realized in the past can not maintain itself, because the motivation of the investors, managers, individuals is changed in other directions which subminate the sustained investments and innovations. The goals are others, including the social goals, which have now more priority compared to the goals which supported the economic progress. The countries cross these stages one by one, as a rule, but it is not excluded certain stages to be subpressed or to be prolonged more ( Fota Constantin, 2004 ).
4. The loss of the competitive advantage The aquirement of the competitive advantage supposes in an equal way the appearance of the risk to loose it. Porter declares that the national advantage is lost when the „national diamond” stimulates no longer the innovation and investments in the direction in which the market evolves, and the industries have no longer a correct perception of the demand. Porter investigated and analyzed which developments lead to loosing the competitive advantage at the national level: