Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Nature of Verbal Knowledge in Nyaya Philosophy, Study notes of Philosophy

An in-depth analysis of the nyaya school's perspective on the nature of verbal knowledge (sabda). It delves into the nyaya epistemology, which accepts four means of valid knowledge (pramanas): pratyaksa (perception), anumana (inference), upamana (comparison and analogy), and sabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). The nyaya view on the instrumental cause, operation, and auxiliary cause of verbal knowledge, as well as the distinction between the traditional and modern nyaya perspectives on the denotative function of language. It highlights the nyaya emphasis on the reliability of the source and the role of recollection in the process of verbal knowledge acquisition. A comprehensive understanding of the nyaya philosophy of language and its evolution from the pracheen nyaya (old nyaya) to the navya-nyaya (new nyaya) school.

Typology: Study notes

2023/2024

Uploaded on 10/24/2024

shanthi_48
shanthi_48 🇺🇸

4.8

(36)

901 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
The Nyaya Perspective on Verbal
Knowledge
Nyaya Philosophy of Language
General Description of Verbal Knowledge: Word (Śabda)
According to the Naiyayikas, Śabda (word) is one of the four means of valid
knowledge. Śabda (verbal knowledge) means relying on the word, the
testimony of past or present reliable experts. One must rely on experts, such
as one's parents, family, friends, teachers, ancestors, and kindred members
of society, to rapidly acquire and share knowledge and thereby enrich each
other's lives. This means of gaining proper knowledge is either spoken or
written, but through Śabda (words). The reliability of the source is
important, and legitimate knowledge can only come from the Śabda of
reliable sources.
Vyatsayana, the commentator on the Nyaya Sutra, explained who a reliable
person is as "one who knows the truth as it is" (yathartha), and whose
sentence contains cognition and thus cannot convey falsity. The Naiyayikas
believe that the actual instrumental cause of verbal knowledge is not the
words that are actually being known, but the knowledge itself of words. This
is to include cases where a person who keeps silence writes down words, or
shows a particular gesture with their fingers to produce knowledge of a
number, for example. In such cases, there could be verbal knowledge from
the knowledge of words symbolized by the script or the gesture.
Nature of Verbal Knowledge
According to the Karikavali, the instrumental cause of verbal knowledge is
the cognition itself of words. Its operation is the knowledge (i.e.,
recollection) of the meanings of words, and the knowledge of the denotative
function is the auxiliary cause.
The process of verbal knowledge, as described in the first Karika on Śabda
(Karika 81), is as follows:
a) Instrumental cause of verbal knowledge: Perception/cognition of words
(padajhanam tviti) by the sense of hearing or the knowledge of words which
arise from seeing the script.
b) Operation of the Instrumental cause: Knowledge (i.e., recollection) of the
meanings of words (padarthadhiriti). - The recollection of the meanings of
words is produced by the knowledge of words. - The auxiliary cause, in order
to produce the operation, is the knowledge of the denotative function, which
is the relation of the word and its meaning. - Without the knowledge of the
denotative function, the recollection of the meanings of words would not be
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download The Nature of Verbal Knowledge in Nyaya Philosophy and more Study notes Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

The Nyaya Perspective on Verbal

Knowledge

Nyaya Philosophy of Language

General Description of Verbal Knowledge: Word (Śabda)

According to the Naiyayikas, Śabda (word) is one of the four means of valid knowledge. Śabda (verbal knowledge) means relying on the word, the testimony of past or present reliable experts. One must rely on experts, such as one's parents, family, friends, teachers, ancestors, and kindred members of society, to rapidly acquire and share knowledge and thereby enrich each other's lives. This means of gaining proper knowledge is either spoken or written, but through Śabda (words). The reliability of the source is important, and legitimate knowledge can only come from the Śabda of reliable sources.

Vyatsayana, the commentator on the Nyaya Sutra, explained who a reliable person is as "one who knows the truth as it is" (yathartha), and whose sentence contains cognition and thus cannot convey falsity. The Naiyayikas believe that the actual instrumental cause of verbal knowledge is not the words that are actually being known, but the knowledge itself of words. This is to include cases where a person who keeps silence writes down words, or shows a particular gesture with their fingers to produce knowledge of a number, for example. In such cases, there could be verbal knowledge from the knowledge of words symbolized by the script or the gesture.

Nature of Verbal Knowledge

According to the Karikavali, the instrumental cause of verbal knowledge is the cognition itself of words. Its operation is the knowledge (i.e., recollection) of the meanings of words, and the knowledge of the denotative function is the auxiliary cause.

The process of verbal knowledge, as described in the first Karika on Śabda (Karika 81), is as follows:

a) Instrumental cause of verbal knowledge: Perception/cognition of words (padajhanam tviti) by the sense of hearing or the knowledge of words which arise from seeing the script.

b) Operation of the Instrumental cause: Knowledge (i.e., recollection) of the meanings of words (padarthadhiriti). - The recollection of the meanings of words is produced by the knowledge of words. - The auxiliary cause, in order to produce the operation, is the knowledge of the denotative function, which is the relation of the word and its meaning. - Without the knowledge of the denotative function, the recollection of the meanings of words would not be

possible, as one could also have the recollection of ether when hearing words like "jar" that inhere in ether.

The Naiyayikas believe that the denotative function is the relation of the meaning of a word with that word, and that it is in the form of the will of God, i.e., from this word, this meaning is to be understood. Recent terms (given by parents, for example) have denotative functions, but terms coined by moderns (like "nadi" and "vrddhi") have no denotative functions, according to the traditional school.

The modern Naiyayikas, however, hold that the will of God is not the denotative function but merely the will, and thus, they say that terms coined by modern Naiyayikas indeed have denotative functions.

The result of the whole process is verbal knowledge, which means the knowledge of the meaning of a sentence, i.e., the knowledge of the relation of the meanings of words.

From Old-Nyaya to Modern-Nyaya

The Pracheen Nyaya (old Nyaya, concerned with concepts) had a recorded history of dialogues, but this created ambiguity because the language used was neutral and fell prey to misunderstandings due to misinterpretations. The Navyanyaya (modern Nyaya) discovered this and emphasized the need for a non-ambiguous, clear language. Thus, the period of Navyanyaya focused on the methods and instruments of knowing. Any language of human beings can be used to transmit knowledge, and Navyanyaya developed language for precise points. There was a shift from "prameyapradan" (providing the object of knowledge) to "pramanapradan" (providing the means of knowledge) from Pracheen-Nyaya to Navyanyaya.