



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A research article that investigates the effect of grinding corn on its digestibility and metabolizable energy content when consumed by pigs. The study was conducted by W.P. Gakkigus and H.H. Mitchell at the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station. The researchers found that grinding corn improved its digestibility, particularly for protein and nitrogen-free extract, but the increase in metabolizable energy was minimal. The study also highlighted the importance of measuring the digestibility of corn to determine its nutritive value and economic feasibility of grinding.
What you will learn
Typology: Summaries
1 / 6
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
By W. P. GAKKIGUS, graduate student^ and H. H. MITCHELL, chief in animal nutrition, Department of Animal Husbandry, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station INTRODUCTION
The effect of grinding on the value of corn {Zea mays) as a feed for pigs has been studied mainly in feeding experiments, the results being measured by the rapidity and feed economy of the gains secured. In the United States it has in general been found, according to Morrison,^ that for young pigs ground corn is not appreciably superior to whole corn, but for older pigs, variable percentage advantages in economy of gains may result from the feeding of ground corn. How- ever, a more recent summary by Crampton ^ indicates no advantage due to grinding at any weight of pig. In sharp contrast to the American experiments are the results of Hansson ^ in Sweden, who calculated from his own feeding experiments on pigs that the produc- tive value of maize was increased by fine grinding by as much as 15 to 18 percent. Such findings as are obtained in feeding experiments are the resultants of a number of factors, including effects of grinding on the digestibility of the corn, on its palatability, and, as Crampton points out, on its wastage at the feed trough: ^Shelled corn lost from the feederds salvaged by the hogs but ground feed is not * * * Feed rootedout of the trough and lost to the pig is, of course, still charged to the gains made.^' A complete understanding of the problem, therefore, demands a consideration of each of these factors.
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
The factor most amenable to quantitative study, and perhaps the most fundamental factor of all, is the effect of grinding corn on its digestibility. However, very little study seems to have been made on this point. A summary of such work as has been found in the literature is embodied in table 1. The corn in Jordan's experiment ^ was a flint variety. The experi- mental pig weighed about 50 pounds and received in each of the two digestion trials 787 g of corn daily. The collection period was of 5 days duration.
1 Received for publication Feb. 18,1935; issued July 1935. 2 HENRY, W. A., and MORRISON, F. B. FEEDS AND FEEDING; A HANDBOOK FOR STUDENT AND STOCK- MAN. Ed. 18, 770 pp., illus. Madison, Wis. 1923. 3 CRAMPTON, E. W. THE COMPARATIVE FEEDING VALUES FOR LIVESTOCK OF BARLEY, OATS, WHEAT, RYE, AND CORN, A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA * * * 107 pp., illus. Ottawa. 1933. (Canada Honorary Advisory Council Sei. and Indus. Research Rept. 28.) * HANSSON, N. EINFLUSS DER VERSCHIEDENEN BEREITUNGSWEISEN AUF DER VERDAULICHKEIT UND DEN FUTTERWERT DER GETREIDEARTEN. Biedermann's Zentbl. Agr. u. Rationellen Landwirtschaftsbet rieb, Abt. B. Tierernährung, Ztschr. Gesamt. Fütterungslehre u. Futtermittelkunde 3: 243-274. 1931. « JORDAN, W. H. DIGESTIBILITY OF MAIZE KERNEL (CORN) IN VARIOUS FORMS. Maine Agr. Expt. Sta. Ann. Rept. 1885-86: 59-64. 1886.
Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 60, no. 9 Washington, D. C. May 1, 1935 Key no. I11.- (731)
In Haberhauffe's experiment,^ the degrees of fineness of the ground corn studied can be roughly characterized by the percentages passing through a 1-mm round-hole sieve, i. e., 42, 63, and 98. The two pigs weighed initially 87.5 kg. They received daily 4 kg of the corn mixed with water, except that the whole corn was fed mixed with the coarsely ground corn in even proportions. The digestibiUty of the whole corn was then computed indirectly. Apparently the pigs were not fed or confined separately during the collection period of 7 days.
TABLE 1.-— Previous investigations of the effects of grinding on the digestibility of corn when consumed by swine
Condition of corn
Num- ber of pigs
Digestion of coefficients obtained Authority and Organic reference matter
Crude protein
Crude fat Crude fiber
N-free extract
Whole kernels^ ___ _-. 1 1 2 2 2 2
1Jordan. 1 1
Finely ground _ _ _ _. _ _ Whole kernels Coarsely ground Medium ground Finely ground. _
Haberhaufl:e.
1 See footnote 5. 2 See footnote 6.
The experiment of Jordan ^ in particular indicates a marked mi- provement in the digestibility of corn by grinding it to a fine meal, possibly because a flint variety of corn was used. In Jordan's study, grinding improved the digestibility of the organic matter 9.4 percent, that of protein 25.3 percent, and that of nitrogen-free extract 6. percent. The results obtained by Haberhauffe indicate less improve- ment for the finely ground meal, i. e., 5.9 percent in the digestibility of the organic matter, 10.9 percent in the digestibility of the protein, and 3.0 percent in the digestibility of the nitrogen-free extract. The meals of intermediate fineness show an intermediate but graded improvement. It appears from these two experiments, constituting the only published work on the problem, that the effect of grinding on the digestibility of corn has not yet been precisely measured. Since the nutritive advantages of the grinding of corn must be balanced against the cost of grinding in deciding whether and when this method of preparing corn is economical, the need of more work of this character seems evident. The experiment reported below is a further contri- bution to this problem.
PLAN OF EXPERIMENT
The subjects of the experiment were 5 Chester White barrows and 1 Hampshire barrow (pig 4), weighing initially from 135 to 196 pounds. Each of the pigs received daily either 1,300 g or 1,500 g of corn, depending upon appetite, with no other feed. The digesti- bility and metabolizable energy content of the whole corn and of the same corn after grinding was determined with 5 of the 6 pigs, 1
6 HABERHAUFFE, W. üBER DEN EINFLUSS DER ZUBEREITUNG AUF DIE VERDAULICHKEIT DER FUTTER- MITTEL. Jour. Landw. 74: [191]-230. 1926. 7 JORDAN, W, H. See footnote 5.
TABLE 3.— Results of the digestion and the metabolism trials with whole and ground corn when consumed by swine
Daily intake in food Coefficients of digestion Metabolizableenergy
Body Condition
Nitro- Pig (^) Per kilo-
gen bal- no. weight of corn Corn Dry mat- ter
Gross en- ergy
Nitro- gen
Dry mat- ter
Per-
Gross en- ergy
Nitro- gen Crude fiber Total^
gram of dry mat- ter con- sumed
ance day
Kilo- Calo- Per- Per- Per- Calo- grams Grams Grams ries Grams cent cent cent cent ries Calories Grams 1 / 83.5I 78.9 Whole-Ground _^ 1,5001,500^ 1,3421,335^ 6,0376,049^ 25.0525.05^ 85.187.4^ 82.585.9^ 65.077.2^ 68.570.5^ 4,8475,010^ 3,6123,753^ -f3.19+4. {"78:5" 2 Whole- Ground. 1,500 1,335 6,049 25.05 89.2 88.0 83.2 73.6 5,153 3,860 -f5. 3 f 62.1t 63.5 Whole-Ground-^ 1,3001,300^ 1,1531,156^ 5,1575,219^ 21.7121.71^ 86.087.6^ 83.686.3^ 63.080.0^ 77.072.9^ 4,1744,367^ 3,6203,778^ --3.32--3. 4 f 67.1\ 64.4 Whole-Ground-^ 1,3001,300 1,1631,157^ 5,2325,243^ 21.7121.71^ 88.488.8^ 87.286.6^ 73.178.2^ 7a 073.1^ 4,4074,422^ 3,7893,822^ --4.01--4. 5 f 83.9I 86.2 Whole-Ground-^ 1,5001,500 1,3311,333^ 5,9506,022^ 25.0525.05^ 91.490.4^ 89.689.0^ 80.085.1^ 75.7 (0^ 5,1245,125^ 3,8503,845 --4.31--4. 6 f 89.4I 90.7 Whole-Ground-^ 1,5001,500^ 1,3311,333^ 5,9506,022^ 25.0525.05 82.087.9 86.180.0^ 71.078.2^ 46.570.9^ 4,5755,008^ 3,4373,757^ --2.76-f4.
1 This sample of feces was accidentally thrown out before the crude fiber determination was made.
The most significant results of the digestion and metabolism trials are assembled in table 3. It is evident from the coeflicients of digest- ibility that, except for protein (nitrogen), the constituents of the ground corn were not digested to a markedly greater extent than the constituents of the unground corn. Omitting the incomplete results for pig 2, the average coefficients of digestibility of the whole corn and ground corn were, respectively, 86.6 and 88.4 for dry matter, 84. and 86.9 for gross energy, and 70.4 and 79.7 for protein. The per- centage improvement in the digestibilities were 2.1 for dry matter, 2. for gross energy, and 13.2 for protein. For the four pigs for which the coefficient of digestibility of crude fiber was determined, the averages were 65.5 for the whole corn and 71.8 for the ground corn, but if the atypical results of pig 6 are omitted, the averages are very nearly the same, i. e., 71.8 and 72.2. It is especially noteworthy that pig 6, which appeared to be passing unbroken and undigested more than a third of all whole corn kernels consumed, digested the whole com fairly well, except for the crude fiber. While grinding improved the digestibility of corn for this pig somewhat more than for the other pigs, the relative improvement was far less than would be expected from the physical examination of the feces for unbroken kernels, proving the latter method to be quite unreliable as a criterion of completeness of digestion. The apparently unbroken kernels must have been very largely denuded of their digestible contents by the digestive enzymes. Since corn is preeminently an energy food, the metabolizable energy values of whole and ground corn are of great practical significance. But here also the improvement brought about by grinding is slight, except for pig 6. In fact, for one pig (no. 5) no improvement at all resulted. For all five pigs upon which complete data were obtained, the metabolizable energy per kilogram of dry matter averaged 3, calories for the whole corn and 3,791 calories for the ground corn, representing an improvement of only 3.5 percent.
May 1,1935 Efsct oj Grinding on Digestibility of Corn by Pigs 735
The pigs were in positive nitrogen balance in all periods. The consistently greater digestibility of the protein of the ground corn did not, however, promote consistently higher nitrogen balances, since without exception the urine from pigs on the ground corn ration con- tained more nitrogen than that from the same pigs on the whole corn ration. In one pig (no. 5) the lesser wastage of nitrogen in digestion on the ground corn ration was more than offset by the greater wast- age in metabolism, while for another pig (no. 3) these two tendencies just balanced each other. Thus, the 13-percent improvement in the digestion of the nitrogen of the corn brought about by grinding was largely lost in metabolism, a result suggesting that the digestible nitro- gen escaping digestion in the whole corn represents a fraction of the corn protein that is of low value biologically.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The relative digestibility of whole and ground corn and their con- tent of metabolizable energy were determined on five pigs weighing from 135 to 196 pounds. Grinding corn to a medium degree of fineness (29 percent passing a 40-mesh sieve, 58 percent a 20-mesh sieve, and 95 percent a 12-mesh sieve) increased the digestibility of the protein by 13 percent, but the digestibility of the gross energy of the corn was raised only 2.8 percent. The metabolizable energy was also only slightly improved; i. e., 3. percent. Furthermore, the appreciable advantage in protein di- gestibility occasioned by the grinding of corn was largely lost by greater losses of nitrogen incurred in metabolism, so that the net effect on the nitrogen balance of an animal receiving an exclusive ration of corn was slight and inconstant. The net effect of grinding upon the nutritive value of corn for pigs of the weights used in this test is to increase its value as a source of energy by 3.5 percent. Its value as a source of protein was not appreciably altered.