Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Of Mice and Men: Context and Themes, Lecture notes of Literature

An overview of John Steinbeck's novel 'Of Mice and Men,' focusing on its historical context during the Great Depression and Steinbeck's experiences. The text also discusses the literary context, comparing it to Harriet Beecher Stowe's 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' and Ernest Hemingway's influence. The document highlights the themes of loneliness, powerlessness, and dreams present in the novel.

What you will learn

  • What historical events influenced John Steinbeck while writing 'Of Mice and Men'?
  • What literary influences can be identified in 'Of Mice and Men'?
  • How did Steinbeck's experiences as a farmhand shape the novel?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

lakshmirnarman
lakshmirnarman 🇺🇸

5

(5)

221 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Of Mice and Men Context
- 1 -
The Context of Of Mice and Men
Overview
Written in 1937 within the context of the Great Depression (began in 1929 and didn’t
truly end until the Second World War began) and its effect on the Californian working
class.
Steinbeck drew heavily from his own experiences as a teenage farm hand in California
he had lived through many of the same experiences as his characters. It also draws
from his friendship with Ed Ricketts, an early proponent of ecological thinking.
Steinbeck was very political; he worked as a reporter prior to the publication of Tortilla
Flat (his first commercially successful novel) and thought of farmers, landowners and
bankers as immoral in the way by which they exploited workers. Of Mice and Men is an
example of a social protest novel in the tradition of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s
Cabin. However, where Of Mice and Men diverges from Uncle Tom’s Cabin is in its relative
lack of idealism.
Steinbeck did not abide by the Romanticism (focus on human ideals, moral virtue,
emotional sensibility) and was instead one of the first and most influential American
proponents of literary realism. Rather than try and show the world as it could be,
Steinbeck was interested in showing the world as it was.
His terse style was heavily influenced by his contemporary, Ernest Hemingway. He,
much like Hemingway, focussed on themes such as masculinity and manliness; as
evidenced by the book’s intense focus on what makes a man often at the expense of its
characterisation of women.
The inspiration behind the title of the novella came from Robert Burns’ To a Mouse, on
Turning Her Up in Her Nest With the Plough, November, 1785. The original title was
‘Something that Happened’.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Of Mice and Men: Context and Themes and more Lecture notes Literature in PDF only on Docsity!

The Context of Of Mice and Men

Overview

  • Written in 1937 within the context of the Great Depression (began in 1929 and didn’t truly end until the Second World War began) and its effect on the Californian working class.
  • Steinbeck drew heavily from his own experiences as a teenage farm hand in California
    • he had lived through many of the same experiences as his characters. It also draws from his friendship with Ed Ricketts, an early proponent of ecological thinking.
  • Steinbeck was very political; he worked as a reporter prior to the publication of Tortilla Flat (his first commercially successful novel) and thought of farmers, landowners and bankers as immoral in the way by which they exploited workers. Of Mice and Men is an example of a social protest novel – in the tradition of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin. However, where Of Mice and Men diverges from Uncle Tom’s Cabin is in its relative lack of idealism.
  • Steinbeck did not abide by the Romanticism (focus on human ideals, moral virtue, emotional sensibility) and was instead one of the first and most influential American proponents of literary realism. Rather than try and show the world as it could be, Steinbeck was interested in showing the world as it was.
  • His terse style was heavily influenced by his contemporary, Ernest Hemingway. He, much like Hemingway, focussed on themes such as masculinity and manliness; as evidenced by the book’s intense focus on what makes a man – often at the expense of its characterisation of women.
  • The inspiration behind the title of the novella came from Robert Burns’ To a Mouse, on Turning Her Up in Her Nest With the Plough, November, 1785. The original title was ‘Something that Happened’.

Historical Context Steinbeck wrote Of Mice and Men in 1937 in an America that was ravaged by the Great Depression. In 1929 there was an enormous stock market crash – caused by speculation – that wiped out the savings of many middle Americans. The U.S.A responded to the crisis by a policy of isolationism, cutting imports and focussing on domestic production. This was a decidedly bad idea. There was an enormous demand for crops to feed the population in an era where one couldn’t rely on sourcing basic necessities from elsewhere. Farmers, bankers and landowners took advantage of the crisis to grow their own estates at the expense of workers – particularly migrant workers (those without a home, rather than those that came from foreign countries). The increased demand for crops meant an increased demand for workers, certainly, but the supply of workers grew at a much larger rate as people lost their savings, sources of income and often even their houses. Lennie and George are both built of this mould – they have no place to call home so they dream of somewhere where they can settle. Many dismiss their dream as one that millions have had and have never manage to fulfil. Here, Steinbeck mounts an obvious criticism of what was, until 1931 when the term was coined by James Truslow Adams, an unspoken national ethos

  • the American Dream. This was the idea that “life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement”. That no matter one’s circumstances, one could always make it in America. Steinbeck demonstrates that this was ludicrous in the sheer determinism (the idea that the path of our lives is decided on with little input from ourselves) of the novella. Steinbeck was born in Salinas, California – the setting of Of Mice and Men – and was familiar with the local farms, fields and woods, all wonderfully brought to life within the book. Steinbeck had worked as a farmhand himself as a teenager. Born to a comfortable enough life, he had never before been confronted by the viciousness that characterised the life of the American migrant worker. Until 1928, he survived doing odd jobs in New York and California, working as a tour guide, caretaker, and manufacturer of plastic mannequins amongst other things. Once the economy crashed, he moved into a cottage paid for by his parents and received loans from them so he could write without worrying about work. This time was not without its difficulties: once the market crashed in 1929, Steinbeck and his wife, Carol, would live off fish and crabs they caught from their boat along with vegetables from their garden. When they couldn’t find these, they often stole from local markets. However, much in the spirit of his social conscience, Steinbeck would always share his ill-gotten gains with his friends.

about Adolf Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem, called the ‘banality of evil’ – an evil which is unaware of its own cruelty. Literary Context Novels of this kind were common enough in America – deeply moralistic pieces with somewhat underdeveloped characters are a tradition dating back to Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Uncle Tom’s Cabin is an anti-slavery novel whose protagonist, Tom, is a noble and principled black slave who stands up for his ideals and earns the grudging respect of his white oppressors. Stowe’s novel is credited with altering American attitudes towards race to at least some extent. However, it arguably failed to ameliorate the plight of African Americans as its simplistic portrayal of Tom and other characters inspired a great deal of stereotypes about black people prevalent to this day – ‘uncle tom’ is now a pejorative directed at black people who are accused of selling out to white people, ‘picaninny’ was co-opted into a racial slur and contributed to a developing culture of minstrelsy, and the ‘mammy’ figure stereotyped black women as fat, sassy and subservient to white authority. Steinbeck’s novella, with its marginally more complex characters, paints a starker picture of humanity, warts and all, as no one within the book can properly be called morally upstanding. This places Steinbeck firmly within the context of literary realism – a movement spawned in the late 19th^ century in opposition to romanticism. Where romanticism emphasised idealism, the human spirit and sensitivity (in other words, things as they should be), realism instead tried to depict things as they are. The scenes explored by realism are banal and commonplace, not idealised and romantic. It attempts to capture the subtle magic of the everyday and the beauty of the commonplace in an attempt to elevate the ordinary to art. However, one could argue that Steinbeck only captured things as they were to white men; his characterisations of women and black men in the novella are certainly found wanting. He encourages us to blame Curley’s wife for her own death. Crooks is portrayed as bitter in his treatment of white men because he isn’t willing to indulge innocent Lennie until he feels sorry for ‘torturing’ him. Even Aunt Clara, entirely willing to care for Lennie until she died, is called a ‘little fat old woman’ and only arrives in the story to chastise Lennie for how he’s an inconvenience to George. Some have attributed his reflections on the nature of stiff upper lip, stone-faced, stoic masculinity to his reverence for his contemporary, Ernest Hemingway. Steinbeck said of

Hemingway that he was perhaps ‘the finest writer of our generation’. The feeling was not reciprocated, Hemingway routinely criticised Steinbeck as a popular writer whose novels were cheap and easy. There are a number of explanations for why this may be the case. One of the most compelling is that Hemingway was a notoriously competitive author who was determined to be the master of his craft. The other is that Steinbeck’s representation of masculinity was fundamentally found wanting in comparison to Hemingway’s presentation of the same theme (novels like The Garden of Eden certainly suggest that Hemingway’s relationship with the masculine identity was a good deal more complex than people have attributed to him). It is quite coherent to hold that Hemingway’s disdain for Steinbeck was justified. Many critics, including the New York Times and Arthur Meizner, have accused Steinbeck’s work of being superficial, sentimental, and overly moralistic. I tend to agree with this assessment. These opinions tend to rest on the distinctive lack of moral progress his characters make and how this constitutes a flaw in his use of characterisation. The ‘moral of the story’, such as it were, often takes precedence over the story itself. Additionally, Steinbeck lacks something of an original style – he borrows heavily from Hemingway but lacks the innate sense of rhythm, grace and poise that Hemingway had. For example: “His eyes passed over the new men and he stopped. He glanced coldly at George and then at Lennie. His arms gradually bent at the elbows and his hands closed into fists. He stiffened and went into a low crouch. His glance was at once calculating and pugnacious. Lennie squirmed under the look and shifted his feet nervously. Curley stepped gingerly close to him.” This collection of sentences is meant to demonstrate Steinbeck’s comparative lack of fluency. He ignores some of the most basic traits of good writing: he does not vary his sentence lengths, his descriptions of what is meant to be intimidating is anything but, and his prose contradicts itself. One could, in an essay, criticise his lack of technique just as easily as one could commend it. Still, it is worth noting that Steinbeck intended for the book to double as a play; such that its dialogue could be repeated on stage verbatim without much loss to the literary quality of the work. The descriptions of setting that precede the dialogue heavy prose can be considered akin to act and scene breaks. This also explains the extreme symmetry of the book in its 3 acts of 2 scenes each. If we view the book in this light, its lack of technical skill is no longer as much of a problem. The prose is not meant to be beautiful, but instead utilitarian. The beauty of the book lies in its plot and characters; not in its words.