Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Battle of Sauchieburn: James I of Scotland's Struggle Against the Nobility, Study notes of History

An account of the Battle of Sauchieburn, which took place in Scotland in 1460 between King James I and the Scottish nobility. the reasons for the conflict, the events leading up to the battle, and its outcome. The document also includes details about the location of the battle and the armies involved.

What you will learn

  • What were the main causes of the conflict between King James I and the Scottish nobility?
  • What was the outcome of the Battle of Sauchieburn and what happened to King James I?
  • Who were the key players in the Battle of Sauchieburn?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

ronyx
ronyx 🇬🇧

4

(4)

213 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
BATTLE OF SAUCHIEBURN. Ill
into the Scots, that they might be deterred from offering
farther resistance, which was quite in accordance with the
projects and policy of Edward I. for subjugating Scotland.
He nevertheless acted with clemency towards the garrison
in the castle, who surrendered on the day he took posses-
sion of the town. In number the troops composing it were
two thousand, who were allowed to depart with their arms
and all the honours of war, after swearing that they would
never fight against the King of England. Sir William
Douglas, their commander, was detained aprisoner in one
of the towers of the Castle called Hog's Tower, where it
is said he died. Edward continued some days at Berwick,
and in order to fortify it against future attacks of the Scots
caused aditch to be dug through the neck of land between
the Tweed and the sea, no less than eighty feet broad and
forty feet deep. After this siege the town was filled with
English inhabitants, and on the 24th of August Edward
received in it the homage of the Scotish nobility, in the
presence of an English parliament summoned for the pur-
pose, after which he continued his career of conquest in
Scotland.
THE BATTLE OF SAUCHIEBURN.*
A. D. 1488.
JAMES III. was amonarch whose untimely fate marks in
apeculiar manner the characteristic features of the age in
which he lived. The Scotish nobles, fierce and powerful,
utterly disregarded the authority of their sovereign, and con-
*History of Stirlingshire ;Pinkerton's History of Scotland ;
Lindsay of Pitscottie's History ;Statistical Account of Scotland.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download The Battle of Sauchieburn: James I of Scotland's Struggle Against the Nobility and more Study notes History in PDF only on Docsity!

THE

BATTLE OF SAUCHIEBURN.*

A. D. 1488.

JAMES III. was a monarch whose

untimely

fate marks in

a peculiar

manner the characteristic

features of the age

in

which he lived. The Scotish nobles, fierce

and

powerful,

utterly disregarded

the authority

of their sovereign,

and con-

History

of Stirlingshire ; Pinkerton's History

of Scotland ;

Lindsay of Pitscottie's History ; Statistical Account of Scotland.

118 THE SCOTISH WARS.

sidt-red the reigning prince

as a

mere

machine,

with whom

the administration of the

government ostensibly rested,

but who

depended

on them for

co-operation

and

support.

James, on the

contrary,

to adopt the quaint language

of

Drummond of

Hawthornden,

"conceived that

noblemen,

like the coin,

were of his

predecessors' making,

and

why

he

might

not put

his

stamp upon

the same

metal,

so when

those old metals were

defaced,

he

might not refound them,

and

give

them a new

print,

he could not well conceive."

On

many points

the Scotish nobility

differed from their sove-

reigns,

but none

exasperated

them more than

additions to

their ancient order,

and the elevation of

persons

whom

they

considered obscure minions, to a participation

of their rank

and

privileges.

A series of intestine broils

ensued,

for the

most

part

caused

by

the

imprudent

conduct of James,

which

ended in the nobles

appealing

in arms

against

their sovereign

near a spot

illustrious in the annals of Scotish History

where their ancestors

boldly encountered the English

host

where

Bruce, the great

restorer of the

monarchy,

obtained

his signal victory.

Near this

spot

the well-known field of

Bannockburn the

indignant

nobles of Scotland were suc-

cessful with less bloodshed than when Bruce rode

triumph-

ant over the tented field won

by

his skill and the valour of

his warriors.

The disastrous termination of the

reign

of James III.

forms the subject

of the present

narrative. After succes-

sive misfortunes, collisions,

and fruitless

negotiations,

the

insurgent nobility

took the field, having

obtained possession

of the King's

eldest son,

afterwards James

IV.,

by

the treach-

ery

of Shaw of

Sauchie, the governor

of Stirling Castle, to

whose

custody

the

young prince

had been committed

by-

James, with strict orders that

no one of the

disaffected

should be allowed to

approach

him,

and that he was on no

account to be suffered to go

out of the fortress. Ignorant

of Shaw's conduct, the

King

saw no other alternative than

120 THE SCOTTISH WARS.

burgh.

The celebrated Sir Andrew

Wood,

his admiral, had

indeed sailed

up

the Forth as far as Alloa,

and he would

have

proceeded

farther

up

the river if there had been

suf-

ficient

depth

of water for his

vessels. James could have

easily

embarked on board the admiral's

ship,

but as this might

have been

interpreted by

the insurgents

as the result of ti-

midity,

it would

have

increased their boldness,

and done ma-

terial injury

to the royal

cause. Situated as the

King

was,

he had no other alternative than either to betake himself and

followers to the admiral's fleet, or to decide the contest

by

a battle,

and after

calling

a council of the chiefs who followed

his standard,

it was resolved to hazard the latter.

It was in the

month of

June,

and the

forests of Stirling-

shire were clothed with their summer

foliage,

when this

fatal contest was decided. Different indeed were the mo-

tives

which stimulated this

array

of the Scotish nobles from

those

by

which their

gallant

ancestors were

actuated under

the banners of Bruce. The

insurgents,

who soon under-

stood the intentions of the King,

also prepared

for battle,

and

passed

the Carron,

which falls into the Forth near FaU

kirk. Famous as the scene of

many

a stiife in the olden

time as the alleged locality

where Oscar, the son of

Ossian, signalized

himself as a hero,

and where his ancient

warriors contended with the heroes of the streams of

Caros,

the Carron now rolls

along

no

longer

disturbed by

the din

of arms,

and coloured

by

the blood of the dying

and the

dead.

The

insurgent

nobles had

encamped

at the bridge

over

the Carron, near the

Torwood,

when the

King

led his

army

against them,

and

encamped

at a small brook named Sauchie-

burn, a mile south from

the famous field

of Bannockburn.

According

to Lindsay

of Pitscottie,

on the

night

before the

battle another attempt

was made to effect a

negotiation,

which was unsuccessful. The

contending

armies met on a

tract of land now

designated

Little Canglar,

on the east

BATTLE OF SAUCHIEBURN.

side of Sauchieburn.

The forces of the

insurgents

were

greatly superior

to those of the King.

They

consisted

chiefly

of hardy

Borderers inured to war, well armed and

well disciplined,

and were most

unequally opposed by

the

Lowlanders.

The exact number of the

insurgent army

is

not ascertained. The

royal army,

it is said

by

some

writers,

consisted of

30,000 men,

that of the insurgents

but there can be no doubt that these numbers are

greatly

ex-

aggerated,

and it is

generally

admitted that the royal

forces

were

very

inferior in every respect.

James

appeared

in complete

armour on horseback at the

head of his

army,

which he divided

into three lines. The

first was commanded

by

the Earl of Menteith, Lords Er-

skine, Gray,

Ruthven, Graham,

and

Maxwell,

and con-

sisted chiefly

of Highlanders

armed

with swords and bows

;

the second line was headed

by

the Earl of Glencairn,

and

consisted also of Highlanders

arid retainers from the west-

ern counties ; the third,

in which was the

greatest strength

of the army,

was commanded

by

Lords

Boyd

and

Lindsay ;

and the main

body,

in which was the

King,

was led

by

the

Earl of Crawford,

and consisted of men from

Fife, Strath-

earn, the district of Stormont,

and Forfarshire.

The

insurgents also divided their forces into three lines,

and

they

had the

advantage

of displaying

a strong array

of

mounted

troopers.

The first line was

composed

of men

from East Lothian and

Berwickshire, led

by

Lord Home

and the Baron of Hailes

;

the second consisted of men from

Galloway

and the Borders

;

and the

third, under the

nomi-

nal command of the Duke of

Rothsay, though

the prince

was

completely

under the control of the insurgent

noble-

men who

belonged

to this division,

was

composed

of men

from the

midland Lowland

counties.

The

insurgents

advanced with

great boldness,

presuming

too well on the King's

want of

military experience.

James

felt considerable alarm when he saw them

approaching

with

BATTLE OF SAUCHIEBURN.

filling

a pitcher

with water from the stream. Alarmed at

seeing

a man

in armour,

and

riding furiously

as if towards

her,

she threw down the

pitcher

and

fled for safety.

The

noise startled the horse,

and the excited

steed, leaping

over

the Bannockburn

at one

spring,

threw his rider. The

King

was so stunned

and bruised

by

the weight

of his ar-

mour that he

fainted,

and seemed to all

appearance

dead.

This accident

happened

near a mill, the occupants

of which,

consisting of

the miller and his

wife, ran to the assistance

of the unfortunate horseman.

Ignorant

of his rank, they

carried him into their

house,

laid him on a couch in a cor-

ner of their apartment,

and covered him with a cloth to

conceal him from

any

pursuer. Having

administered to him

the remedies they possessed,

the

King revived,

and called

for a priest

to hear his confession. The rustics

inquired

the name and

quality

of their guest,

and James

incautiously

said,

I was

your

King

this morning."

The

miller's wife,

overcome with

astonishment, wrung

her hands,

and

hastily

ran to the door in search of a priest

as the

King

desired.

It

happened

that at the very

moment the miller's wife

came out of the house

some of the

insurgents passed,

who

were

following

the route of the King.

One of these

persons

was a

priest

named

Borthwick,

connected with Lord

Gray's

retainers,

and the

pursuers, having

discovered the object

of

their search, failed not to

improve

the opportunity.

One

of them exclaimed to the woman

Here,

1 am a

priest,

lead me to the

King."

He was

accordingly admitted,

and

kneeling

at the

side of James heard his confession. He

then asked the

King

if he thought

he would recover.

I

might," replied

the unfortunate

monarch,

if I had the

at-

tendance of a physician,

but give

me absolution and the

sa-

crament."

That I shall

readily do,"

said the villain, and

pulling

out a dagger,

he inflicted

several mortal wounds on

the King,

who

instantly expired.

The

perpetrator

of this

atrocious

act was never discovered.

THE SCOTISH WARS.

Some of the

King's

forces retreated towards the Tor-

wood,

and others took

refuge

in the town of

Stirling.

The

insurgents

retired to Linlithgow,

after resting

all the night

succeeding

the battle on the field. The fate

of James was

not then

known,

but in a short time rumours were soon

spread

over the country

of the assassination, aggravated by

an additional report

that the Duke of

Rothsay

was the

murderer

; but it

was

some

days before the

young prince,

now James

IV., received certain information of his father's

fate,

and he heard it with the

deepest anguish.

Still some

asserted that the

King

was

alive,

and a

person

who

came to

Linlithgow

informed the insurgents

that Admiral Wood

was still

traversing

the Forth,

and it was believed that the

King

had reached the fleet in

safety. They immediately

proceeded to Leith,

whence a

message

was sent from the

Duke of

Rothsay

to

Wood,

desiring

to know if the

King

was on board

any

of his vessels. The Admiral

solemnly

declared that he was

not,

and

gave

them

permission

to search

his ships.

A second

message

was

sent, desiring

an inter-

view,

but the Admiral refused to

go

on shore without hos-

tages

for his safety.

Lords Seton and

Fleming

were the

persons

sent as hostages,

and were committed

by

the

Admiral to the

custody

of his brother,

while he

proceeded

to Leith,

and

presented

himself before the prince.

Mis-

taking

the Admiral at

first, from his noble appearance

and

striking resemblance, for the

King, Rothsay

exclaimed,

with tears,

Sir, are

you my

father?"

I am not

your

father," replied

the Admiral,

"but

I

was

your

father's faith-

ful servant,

and an

enemy

to those who have occasioned

his downfal." Some of the

insurgent leaders,

who were be-

ginning

to tremble

for their own

safety,

asked Wood if he

knew

any thing

of the King, or

where he

was,

to which he

replied

that he knew not.

They

then inquired

who the

persons

were who went on board his vessels in boats

op-

posite

Alloa? "I

and

my

brother," replied

the Admiral,

126 THE SCOTISH WARS.

person

who then

possessed

it. The author of the Picture

of Scotland informs us that

he had the

curiosity

to visit

it,

and

to inquire

into the traditionary

account of the cir-

cumstances above

related, as

preserved by

the people

of

the place,

which he was

surprised

to hear tallied in every

particular

with the historical narrative. He was even

shown

the particular

corner in which the

King

was slain.

The house has been somewhat

modernized,

and

converted

from a mill into a dwelling-house.

The lower

part

of the

walls, however,

are to about a man's height unaltered,

and

impressed

with the appearance

of great antiquity.

A corner

stone of the modern

part

of the fabric bears date 1 667.

The

house is divided into two

ends, with separate

doors accom-

modating

two

families,

and is thatched. It stands about

fifty yards east of

the road from

Glasgow

to Stirling,

in

the close

neighbourhood

of the new

mill,

which had been

substituted when it was converted into a

dwelling-house."