
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The perspective of orthodox believers towards don juan's disregard for the sanctity of marriage and his actions as a philanderer, contrasting it with the societal norms of his era and the current society. The text also delves into the philosophical perspective of hobbes and don juan's pursuit of happiness and well-being.
Typology: Papers
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
M O D E R N I T Y A N D I T S D I S C O N T E N T S Many Filipinos are devout Roman Catholics. I was raised in this faith and I have been taught that divorce essentially should not exist. A man “[leaves] his father and mother and [to] be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh" and one must “make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:31, 2-3). Since God joins a man and wife together, no one is to separate them (Matthew 19:5-6). Don Juan’s view of marriage and his actions as a philanderer show his disregard towards the sanctity of marriage. His affinity for bedding any woman who charms him puts him in harm’s way since “those who live [sinfully] will not inherit the kingdom of God”, just as his father warned him (Galatians 5:21). From the viewpoint of orthodox believers, Don Juan’s behavior is very wrong. All his actions fit the description of what is considered to be of a sinful nature: “sexual immorality, impurity, and debauchery” (Galatians 5:19). However, it is easy to rationalize Don Juan’s “technique for ensnaring beautiful young women” (Don Juan 1.1). His technique, as his valet Sganarelle describes it, consists of doing whatever is necessary: “he’ll marry anything” (Don Juan 1.1, 1.2). This may sound unsightly, but he lives in an era where the formality of marriage stands between him and his desires. As Sganarelle observed after Don Juan’s encounter with his Don Luis, telling Don Juan to stop marrying women in order to obtain his desires would be like telling the wind not to blow; it is inevitable since it is part of human nature (as explained by Hobbes). Don Juan was simply born in the wrong era. It would not be far-fetched to think that negative connotations of fornication would not be an issue for someone who believes meeting “one [beauty] first shouldn’t deprive all the rest” of his love, especially since our current society condones it (Don Juan 1.2). He would not make a mockery of marriage in this present era, because it would (for the most part) no longer be necessary to achieve his desires. I found truth in his rant of “the whole pleasure of love [lying] in change,” and the intensity the pursuit preferable to “placid affection” (Don Juan 1.2). Don Juan’s rational even agrees with Hobbes’ theory of “there is no such thing as perpetual tranquility because life itself is but motion.” As Hobbes argued, “we are beings whose fundamental characteristics as human beings are willing and choosing… and much of our happiness depends upon ability to exercise our ability to choose…. Continual success in obtaining those things a man from time to time desireth is what is called happiness and our well-being depends on our ability to achieve the object of our desires”. Don Juan simply chose his path to his happiness and pursued it to maintain his well-being (when disregarding the supernatural powers of Heaven, of course.)