Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Calculating Maximum Deflection of a Beam in an Aquatics Lab: A NASA Spinoff Project, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Introduction to Business Management

Background information on a nasa spinoff project where an aquatics lab was built at kennedy space center to study the effects of weightlessness on fish and snails. Students are tasked with calculating the maximum deflection of a beam under stress due to the weight of racks of 50 gallon aquaria using the given formula and technical information. The document also includes a sample calculation and instructions for sketching graphs and verifying approximations.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/05/2009

koofers-user-p02
koofers-user-p02 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Project Grant Team
John S. Pazdar Peter A. Wursthorn
Project Director Principal Investigator
Capital Comm-Tech College Capital Comm-Tech College
Hartford, Connecticut Hartford, Connecticut
This project was supported, in part, by the Patricia L. Hirschy
National Science Foundation Principal Investigator
Opinions expressed are those of the authors Asnuntuck Comm-Tech College
and not necessarily those of the Foundation Enfield, Connecticut
NASA - AMATYC - NSF
2.11
SPINOFFS
Spinoffs are relatively short learning modules inspired by the LTAs. They can be easily
implemented to support student learning in courses ranging from prealgebra through calculus.
The Spinoffs typically give students an opportunity to use mathematics in a real world context.
LTA - SPINOFF 2A Cost Analysis for the NASA Aquatics Lab
LTA - SPINOFF 2B NASA Aquatics Lab Loading
Ed Chandler - AMATYC Writing Team Member
Scottsdale Community College, Scottsdale, Arizona
Jerry Keepers - AMATYC Writing Team Member
University of Wisconsin Center - Fox Valley, Menasha, Wisconsin
(Currently at Potomac State College, West Virginia)
Reneé Ponik - NASA Scientist/Engineer
Kennedy Space Center, Florida
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Calculating Maximum Deflection of a Beam in an Aquatics Lab: A NASA Spinoff Project and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Introduction to Business Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Project Grant Team

John S. Pazdar Peter A. Wursthorn Project Director Principal Investigator Capital Comm-Tech College Capital Comm-Tech College Hartford, Connecticut Hartford, Connecticut

This project was supported, in part, by the Patricia L. Hirschy National Science Foundation Principal Investigator Opinions expressed are those of the authors Asnuntuck Comm-Tech College and not necessarily those of the Foundation Enfield, Connecticut

NASA - AMATYC - NSF

SPINOFFS

Spinoffs are relatively short learning modules inspired by the LTAs. They can be easily

implemented to support student learning in courses ranging from prealgebra through calculus.

The Spinoffs typically give students an opportunity to use mathematics in a real world context.

LTA - SPINOFF 2A Cost Analysis for the NASA Aquatics Lab

LTA - SPINOFF 2B NASA Aquatics Lab Loading

Ed Chandler - AMATYC Writing Team Member

Scottsdale Community College, Scottsdale, Arizona

Jerry Keepers - AMATYC Writing Team Member

University of Wisconsin Center - Fox Valley, Menasha, Wisconsin

(Currently at Potomac State College, West Virginia)

Reneé Ponik - NASA Scientist/Engineer

Kennedy Space Center, Florida

SPINOFF 2B

Aquatics Lab Loading

Background Information

French and German scientists used space aboard the Shuttle Columbia for an August 1997 launch. They had constructed experiments to study the effects of weightlessness on fish and snails.

An aquatics lab was built at Kennedy Space Center which was used to perform preliminary experiments in preparation for the launch. Unused office space on the second floor of an existing building was modified as shown on the floor plan on the last page of this Spinoff. The plan shows a number of racks of aquaria of different sizes which were distributed as shown in the plan.

Student Task

You are to calculate the maximum deflection of a beam under stress due to the weight of racks of 50 gallon aquaria.

Technical Information

The relation between weight on a horizontal beam and the amount of bending which results can be understood by considering a simple example. Suppose a person is standing on a diving board above a pool. A diving board is a horizontal beam supported at one end. The further out a person stands from the supported end of the diving board, the greater the bending of the board. Experiments show that, within the elastic limits of the material, this relation is linear. That is, the effect of the weight, w , on the bending of a diving board is proportional to wx , where x is the distance measured from the supported end of the diving board. The product wx is called a moment of force, often measured in ft-lbs.

Let x be the horizontal distance along a beam, and let y be the vertical deflection of the beam (Figure 1).

Figure 1

The amount of bending of the beam is given by the formula for curvature, κ.

κ =

d 2 y dx 2

dy dx

^2

3 2

When κ is small there is very little bending.

NASA - AMATYC - NSF

So, with the reactive forces calculated, the diagram of our sample situation is shown below:

A B

150 lb

6 ft 3 ft

50 lb (^) 100 lb

Now, to compute the moment, M ( x ), about a variable point x , we let x = 0 at A. Then,

for 0 ≤ x ≤ 6, M ( x ) = 50 x , and for 6 ≤ x ≤ 9, M ( x ) = 50 x − 150( x − 6).

Note: M (0) = M (9) = 0; i.e., the bending is zero at the ends where the beam is supported.

Using Equation 1, integrating M(x) twice and using boundary conditions to evaluate the constants of integration would give the deflection y in terms of x. However, since M(x) is piecewise defined, if each piece were to be integrated separately, there would be four constants of integration to evaluate. To alleviate this cumbersome procedure, M(x) can be written as M(x) = 50 x – 150 < x – 6 >, where < x – 6 > is itself piecewise:

< x − 6 > =

x − 6 if x ≥ 6 0 if x < 6

In general, < xa > n =

( xa ) n^ if xa 0 if x < a

are called singularity functions. Using a

singularity function, only two constants of integration need to be calculated. Thus,

M ( x ) = EI

d^2 y dx 2 =50^ x^ −150 <^ x^ −^ 6 >,

⇒ EI

dy dx

=25 x 2 − 75 < x − 6 > 2

  • C 1 , and

EI y ( x ) =

x 3 − 25< x − 6 > 3

  • C 1 x + C 2

Since y (0) = y (9) = 0 (the beam is supported at both ends), we get C 1 = − 600 , and

C 2 = 0. Therefore,

EI y ( x )=

x 3 − 25< x − 6> 3 − 600 x , 0 ≤ x ≤ 9 (Equation 2)

NASA - AMATYC - NSF

Recall, < x – 6 > is zero when x < 6. Using this fact and the first derivative test, it can be shown that the maximum deflection occurs at x = 4.90 ft. Consider, for example, a wooden beam with cross sectional dimension 2" x 4" resting on its edge. For this situation, a table of values for the

modulus of elasticity gives E ≅ 1.6 x 10^6 lb/in^2 , and a moment of inertia, I ≅ 6.25 in^4. At x = 4.90 ft, the amount of the maximum deflection is, from Equation 2, y = 0.339 inches.

Note: Since the units of M(x) are ft-lbs, the right-hand side of Equation 2 has dimensions lb-ft^3 ,

so you must convert the result of the calculation on the right-hand side to lb-in^3 in order to obtain the correct answer.

Worksheet

Part I: Singularity Functions

  1. On the coordinate axes provided below, sketch the graphs of < x – a >^0 , < x – a >^1 , and

< x – a >^2 , for a > 0.

  1. Using Equation 2, sketch the graph of y(x) on [–10, 15]. Use feet for the units on the x - axis and inches for the units on the y -axis.

NASA - AMATYC - NSF

Part III: Calculating y(x)

Referring to the floor plan on the last page of this Spinoff, the third row of aquaria from the right- hand side consists of four racks of 50 gallon aquaria. The aquaria are stacked three high in a rack. Water weighs 8.34 lb/gal, and each rack which holds three aquaria weighs 250 lb. As a convenient approximation, suppose that the combined weight of water and rack is concentrated at the geometric center of the rectangles shown in the floor plan.

  1. Assume the row of 50 gallon aquaria rests on a reinforced concrete beam 26 feet long. Use a ruler to estimate to the nearest 1/16 inch (i.e., the nearest 1/2 foot), the distance from the wall at the top of the page to the geometric center of each rectangular rack. (Use the outside of the double line in the floor plan as the end of the beam.) Fill in the distances and weights on the static diagram shown below. Also, calculate the reactive forces at the beam ends as outlined in the sample calculation, and fill in the reactive force values at the beam ends in following diagram.

__ lbs (^) __ lbs __ lbs __ lbs

__ ft __ ft __ ft

26 ft

__ ft

  1. Using the data from the diagram, calculate y(x) for this situation. You will have four singularity functions in your answer. Also, state the boundary conditions which are needed to determine the constants of integration.

Boundary conditions: y (0) = y (26) = ______

EIy(x) = _____________________________________________________

Note: Before proceeding, verify your solution above with at least one other group member or with your instructor.

NASA - AMATYC - NSF

  1. For the reinforced concrete beam, use E = 6 x 10^6 lb/in^2 and I = 700 in^4. Differentiate y(x), and use the result to calculate the location and the amount of the maximum deflection of the beam.

x -value (location): _________

Maximum deflection: _________

Note: A rule of thumb for structural engineering is that the maximum deflection should not be more than the length of the beam in inches divided by 360. With respect to this rule of thumb, does your answer seem to be “in the ballpark”?

Part IV: A Safety Problem

When NASA designers inspected the lab as equipment was being installed, there was an extra water tank, cylindrical in shape, 4 feet in diameter and 6 feet high, located near the outside wall at point A on the floor plan. The purpose of the extra tank was to cool outside water and provide a source of “settled” water for the aquaria and related experiments. Unfortunately, the tank capacity was far too large for the reinforced concrete floor on which the tank was standing. From original blueprints and building specifications, a NASA engineer calculated that the floor could safely support no more than 200 lb/sq ft.

Calculate the distributed load of the full tank resting on the floor with no special support, and write a concluding statement which indicates a reasonable and simple solution to the problem caused by the presence of the extra tank.

REFERENCE:

Beer and Johnston, Jr.: Mechanics of Materials, 2nd ed., Section 7.5, pp. 432-434, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992.

NASA - AMATYC - NSF