Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods | STAT 3115, Assignments of Statistics

Material Type: Assignment; Class: Analysis of Experiments; Subject: Statistics; University: University of Connecticut; Term: Unknown 1989;

Typology: Assignments

2009/2010

Uploaded on 02/24/2010

koofers-user-xms
koofers-user-xms 🇺🇸

5

(1)

10 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Instructor's
Solutions
Manual
for
Applied
Regression
Analysis
and
Other Multivariable
Methods
Chapter
5
f
The
line does
not
differ
from
the
line
plotted
in
(e).
The
evidence suggests that
there
is no
significant linear relationship. Determining
a
well
fitting
line
is
difficult
given
the
dispersion
of the
data.
3.5
> 2.5 -
2
,
1.5
1
375
13e
13f
400 425 450
WGT (X)
(grams)
475
14. a
j90
=
19.882
$=-0.109
#0:$=0
HA:fi*0
r=-0.76
P =
0.458
Since
the
P-value
is >
0.05,
we
fail
to
reject
HO
and
conclude there
is not a
significant
linear relationship between wavelength
and
year.
b The 95%
CI
for
Pi
equals:
/?,
±^_2A975
SEp=
-0.109
±
(2.101)(0.144)
=
(-0.41,0.19).
c See
graph (below).
540
530
520
o
w
510 -
500 -
490
1870
1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940
YEAR
(X)
5-16
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods | STAT 3115 and more Assignments Statistics in PDF only on Docsity!

Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Chapter 5

f The line does not differ from the line plotted in (e). The evidence suggests that there is no significant linear relationship. Determining a well fitting line is difficult given the dispersion of the data.

3.

> 2.5 -

2 ,

1.

1 375

13e 13f

400 425 450 WGT (X) (grams)

475

  1. a j9 0 = 19.882 $=-0.

0 :$=0 HA:fi*

r=-0.76 P = 0. Since the P-value is > 0.05, we fail to reject HO and conclude there is not a significant linear relationship between wavelength and year.

b The 95% CI for Pi equals: /?, ±^_2A975 • SEp= -0.109 ± (2.101)(0.144) = (-0.41,0.19).

c See graph (below). 540

530

520 o w 510 -

500 -

490 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 YEAR (X)

Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Chapter 5

  1. a See graph (below). As X increases the dispersion of Y increases.

b J3G= -2.546 /?,= 0.032 Y = -2.546 + 0.032X

c See graph. This graph implies a better linear relationship between X and Y.

d J3Q= -6.532 $=1.430 Y = -6.532 + 1.43QAT

e The natural log transformation provides the best representation. The natural log plot illustrates the linear relationship better and the dispersion of the data is more similar at each level of toluene exposure. The first plot indicates that there may be a violation of homoscedasticity for the untransformed data.

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 PPM_TOLU (X) LN_PPMTL (X)

  1. a See graph for plot. As house size increases (X) house price (Y) increases.

b J3 0 = -17.365 $=5.

c Y =-17.365 + 5. 582X. See graph for estimated line. The line fits the data well.

200 -,

„ (ft 150 - o 8 X 100 > LU O OL a. 50

10 15 20 25 HOUSE SIZE (X) (100s of sq. ft.)

30 35

Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods

c See graph. No it does not seem to fit the data very well.

Chapter 5

50 n

o 40

j» 30 P g 20 O

3 4 5 OUTPUT (X)

T=-5.85 P< 0. Since the P-value is < 0.05, we reject Ho&nd conclude that the slope is not equal to zero. There is a significant linear relationship between marginal cost and output.

e A model containing a curvilinear term would better fit the data.

  1. a There may be a slight negative linear relationship.

b Y = J3 0 + J3 1 X + E. (^3) Q =76.008, #=-0.01 5. The baseline OWNEROCC = 76% and as OWNCOST increases by $1,000 the percentage of OWNEROCC decreases by ~ 2%.

c F=76.008-0.015X. See graph for line. The line fits the data well. 80

60 -

OO § 4 0 LU z o 20

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 OWNCOST (X)