


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Assignment; Class: Analysis of Experiments; Subject: Statistics; University: University of Connecticut; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Assignments
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Chapter 5
f The line does not differ from the line plotted in (e). The evidence suggests that there is no significant linear relationship. Determining a well fitting line is difficult given the dispersion of the data.
3.
> 2.5 -
2 ,
1.
1 375
13e 13f
400 425 450 WGT (X) (grams)
475
r=-0.76 P = 0. Since the P-value is > 0.05, we fail to reject HO and conclude there is not a significant linear relationship between wavelength and year.
b The 95% CI for Pi equals: /?, ±^_2A975 • SEp= -0.109 ± (2.101)(0.144) = (-0.41,0.19).
c See graph (below). 540
530
520 o w 510 -
500 -
490 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 YEAR (X)
Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Chapter 5
b J3G= -2.546 /?,= 0.032 Y = -2.546 + 0.032X
c See graph. This graph implies a better linear relationship between X and Y.
d J3Q= -6.532 $=1.430 Y = -6.532 + 1.43QAT
e The natural log transformation provides the best representation. The natural log plot illustrates the linear relationship better and the dispersion of the data is more similar at each level of toluene exposure. The first plot indicates that there may be a violation of homoscedasticity for the untransformed data.
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 PPM_TOLU (X) LN_PPMTL (X)
b J3 0 = -17.365 $=5.
c Y =-17.365 + 5. 582X. See graph for estimated line. The line fits the data well.
200 -,
„ (ft 150 - o 8 X 100 > LU O OL a. 50
10 15 20 25 HOUSE SIZE (X) (100s of sq. ft.)
30 35
Instructor's Solutions Manual for Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
c See graph. No it does not seem to fit the data very well.
Chapter 5
50 n
o 40
j» 30 P g 20 O
3 4 5 OUTPUT (X)
T=-5.85 P< 0. Since the P-value is < 0.05, we reject Ho&nd conclude that the slope is not equal to zero. There is a significant linear relationship between marginal cost and output.
e A model containing a curvilinear term would better fit the data.
b Y = J3 0 + J3 1 X + E. (^3) Q =76.008, #=-0.01 5. The baseline OWNEROCC = 76% and as OWNCOST increases by $1,000 the percentage of OWNEROCC decreases by ~ 2%.
c F=76.008-0.015X. See graph for line. The line fits the data well. 80
60 -
OO § 4 0 LU z o 20
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 OWNCOST (X)