

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concept of socially responsible marketing (srm) and its opposite, greenwashing. Srm is a business practice where companies acknowledge the larger social and environmental impacts of their products and services, signaling their commitment to reduce negative consequences. Greenwashing, on the other hand, is the corporate practice of masking poor social/environmental records with deceptive ad campaigns. The history of srm, the importance of authentic claims, and common greenwashing techniques. It also provides cross-references and further reading for those interested in learning more.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Ellis Jones Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Holy Cross College, 1 College Street, Worcester MA 01610 Abstract. Socially responsible marketing is practiced by companies engaged in corporate social responsibility as a way to clearly communicate their positive social and environmental behaviors to ethical consumers. The opposite practice, greenwashing, is commonly used by companies attempting to gain undue credit for a lackluster commitment to responsible social and environmental behaviors. While the former is preferable, the latter has become increasingly sophisticated and dominant in the marketplace. Keywords: greenwashing; corporate social responsibility; ethical consumer; socially irresponsible marketing; green business Socially Responsible Marketing (SRM) Socially responsible marketing (SRM), sometimes referred to as ethical corporate marketing or green marketing, are practices that some companies adopt to acknowledge the larger social and environmental impacts of their products and services. SRM signals to consumers that the company takes responsibility for and aims to reduce the negative consequences of its operation. These practices fall under the larger rubric of corporate social responsibility (CSR) but are easily conflated with opposing practices: socially irresponsible marketing (SIM), more commonly referred to as greenwashing, the corporate practice of masking poor social/environmental records with deceptive ad campaigns that boast of their socially/environmentally responsible behavior/commitment. Early calls for SRM included restrictions in marketing aimed toward children, particularly vis-à-vis products like tobacco, alcohol, and gambling. Consumer advocates recently added “junk food” to this list of products, in part due to increasing rates of childhood obesity. More recently, some consumers have expressed a desire for SRM that conveys specific, transparent, accurate, and easily understandable information about corporations’ social and environmental responsibility. In other words, some consumers view SRM as a venue for educating the public about the consequences of the consumptive practices. Authentic SRM involves claims that are easily verified using publically available information. Such claims clearly demonstrate that particular corporate practices, products or services are more socially or environmentally responsible than the market competition. The most trusted sources for verifying SRM claims tend to be labels or certifications created and verified by third-party organizations such as USDA Organic, Fair Trade
Association, Green Seal, Green-e, Energy Star, Forest Stewardship Council, Marine Stewardship Council, B Corporation, or Green America. Unfortunately, as the number of third-party certifications has increased, SIM (or greenwashing) has even begun to muddy data from these previously reliable sources. As with other aspects of CSR, companies that wish to legitimately engage in SRM simultaneously face two struggles: 1. How to convey their responsible practices to consumers in ways that distinguish them from irresponsible companies engaged in greenwashing, and 2. How to accurately gauge their own social and environmental responsibility so that they, themselves, don’t inadvertently engage in greenwashing. Greenwashing (a.k.a. Socially Irresponsible Marketing) Greenwashing occurs when companies assert, through advertising and/or public relations, that they are environmentally virtuous despite a clear record indicating the opposite. The term “greenwash” combines “whitewash” (to cover up crimes/scandals) with “green” (environmentally sustainable). Although some consumer advocates employ terms such as “bluewashing” (human rights, poverty, and labor issues) and “pinkwashing” (LGBT and/or breast cancer research issues), greenwashing is more common and has evolved to encompass a broad span of issues beyond environmental responsibility. As greenwashing has become increasingly common, it has also become more sophisticated, consisting of a wide range of techniques that companies use to obscure problematic records and/or “oversell” ostensibly responsible practices. Companies engage in greenwashing in order to increase their market share of the lucrative ethical consumer sector. Some of the most common greenwashing techniques include: