Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Social Network Analysis Theories and Analysis-Lecture[SOCIAL SUPPORT AND HEALTH NETWORKS]-Sociology, Lecture notes of Social Networks Theory and Analysis

The classical theorists of industrialization and modernization (Tönnies, Durkheim, Simmel) viewed urban residents as suffering from debilitating losses of community and intimacy compared to rural villagers. Social Support, Health Networks, Corpore Sano, Modeling Epidemics, Sexually transmitted diseases, Paradox of STDs, Socially Cohesive STDs, Stressors, Nicholas Christakis, Social network diversity , Formalizing Support Networks Social Support and Health Networks, Social Network Analysis Th

Typology: Lecture notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 01/25/2012

desmond
desmond 🇺🇸

4.8

(12)

328 documents

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
SOCIAL SUPPORT & HEALTH NETWORKS
The classical theorists of industrialization and modernization (Tönnies,
Durkheim, Simmel) viewed urban residents as suffering from debilitating
losses of community and intimacy compared to rural villagers.
In “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (1903), Georg Simmel argued
that the modern city’s intense “nervous stimulation” produces a
self that is rational, unemotional, blasé, alienated & autonomous.
(“Stadtluft macht frei [und] krank” – City air makes you free .. and sick).
Lacking traditional society’s constraints, urban dwellers form
calculative & indifferent social relations, with their individualism
reaping negative outcomes, such as loneliness and mental illness.
Emile Durkheim’s Suicide (1897) hypothesized that
either high or low levels of integration (ties to social
groups) and regulation (normative constraints) could
lead to four types of self-murder: fatalistic, egoistic,
anomic, altruistic. (Pescosolido & Levy 2002:8)
These ideas persist in studies of how social networks affect
physical and mental health/illness and coping strategies.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Social Network Analysis Theories and Analysis-Lecture[SOCIAL SUPPORT AND HEALTH NETWORKS]-Sociology and more Lecture notes Social Networks Theory and Analysis in PDF only on Docsity!

SOCIAL SUPPORT & HEALTH NETWORKS

The classical theorists of industrialization and modernization (Tönnies,

Durkheim, Simmel) viewed urban residents as suffering from debilitating

losses of community and intimacy compared to rural villagers.

In “The Metropolis and Mental Life” (1903), Georg Simmel argued that the modern city’s intense “nervous stimulation” produces a self that is rational, unemotional, blasé, alienated & autonomous. (“Stadtluft macht frei [und] krank” – City air makes you free .. and sick).

Lacking traditional society’s constraints, urban dwellers form calculative & indifferent social relations, with their individualism reaping negative outcomes, such as loneliness and mental illness.

Emile Durkheim’s Suicide (1897) hypothesized that either high or low levels of integration (ties to social groups) and regulation (normative constraints) could lead to four types of self-murder: fatalistic, egoistic, anomic, altruistic. (Pescosolido & Levy 2002:8)

These ideas persist in studies of how social networks affect

physical and mental health/illness and coping strategies.

Mens Sana in Corpore Sano?

Ill-structured interpersonal networks can influence development of

physical disease, mental illness, substance abuse. In a vicious

cycle, illnesses that disrupt ego’s support network can then lead

to a downward spiral of job loss, isolation, homelessness, ...

 Epidemiological studies reveal that many contagious

diseases are not transmitted randomly, but by close contacts

 Alcohol & drug addictions are sustained by peer enablers

 Relapse & rehospitalization risk rises for severe mentally ill

patients with unsupportive networks of families and friends

(hostile, critical, emotionally overinvolved)

Conversely, strong-tie support networks may help to inoculate

people against negative outcomes, even catching the common cold!

What public health policy implications of these researches?

The Paradox of STDs

The sexual networks in two small cities infected

with chlamydia had similar sizes & structures:

 Colorado Springs: 401 networks – size 2-12 – with 468 cases and 700 sexual contacts; the chlamydia infection rate increased by 46% from 1996 to 1999  Winnipeg: 442 networks – size 2-20 – with 571 cases and 663 sexual contacts

Until recently, epidemiologists ignored how networks linked by sexual

contact enable sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) to survive and

spread. Infection rates usually too low to become epidemic, but higher

rates in small core networks allow disease to remain endemic. Small

behavioral changes may trigger rapid outbreak into the larger population.

Most nets were dyads or triads, but a handful had more than 10 partners.

“These smaller, sparsely linked networks, peripheral to the core, may form

the mechanism by which chlamydia can remain endemic, in contrast with

larger, more densely connected networks, closer to the core, which are

associated with steep rises in incidence.” (Jolly et al. 2001)

Socially Cohesive STDs

Colorado Springs’ chlamydia networks had little potential for epidemic

propagation, in contrast to its gonorrhea network structure:

“[O]verall network structure is fragmented and dendritic, notably lacking the cyclic (closed loops) structures associated with network cohesion and thus with efficient STD transmission. Comparison of network structure with that of an intense STD outbreak (characterised by numerous cyclic structures) suggests low level or declining endemic rather than epidemic chlamydia transmission during the study interval. … Finally, the gang associated STD outbreak … clearly demonstrates the relation between dense network connectivity and epidemicity. … [N]etwork cohesion seems strongly predictive of STD transmission intensity.” (Potterat et al. 2002:152 & 157)

Four largest chlamydia components Largest gonorrhea component (gang)

Do Your Friends Make You Fat?

“A person's chances of becoming obese increased by 57% if he or she had a friend who became obese in a given interval. Among pairs of adult siblings, if one sibling became obese, the chance that the other would become obese increased by 40%. If one spouse became obese, the likelihood that the other spouse would become obese increased by 37%. “These effects were not seen among neighbors in the immediate geographic location. Persons of the same sex had relatively greater influence on each other than those of the opposite sex. The spread of smoking cessation did not account for the spread of obesity in the network.” (Christakis & Fowler 2007)

Among 12,067 egos in the Framingham Heart Study (1971- 2003), 5,124 had friend ties to another. Largest friendship component was N=2,200 (see Pajek figure on next slide). Obesity was defined as a body-mass index (BMI) ≥ 30. Used time-lagged dependent variable to eliminate serial correlation of errors, control for genetic predispositions.

Nicholas Christakis studied whether the weight gains of an ego are

associated with weight gains by ego’s friends, siblings, spouse, or

neighbors. Obesity clusters extended to “three degrees of separation”!

Figure 1. Largest Connected Subcomponent of the Social Network in the Framingham Heart Study in the Year 2000

Social Network Image Animator (SoNIA) generated network videos

(requires Macromedia Flash program to view)

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/4/370/DC

Formalizing Support Networks

Can intentionally designed support networks – whether nonprofit or

governmental – provide benefits to people with deficient ego-nets?

 Disease-based support networks (e.g., CJD Support Network) try to help patients & families cope with stress, comply with difficult medical regimes  “12-step” self-help programs (e.g., Alcoholic Anonymous) deploy buddy systems to prevent relapses into self-destructive, anti-social behaviors

Caregivers themselves, especially women raising kids

and caring for aged parents, may seek to alleviate their

burdens & stresses by participating in emotional-

support groups:

Parents without Partners; Elder Care Resources; Alzheimers Support Group

References

Christakis, Nicholas A. and James H. Fowler. 2007. “The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years.” New England Journal of Medicine 357:370-79. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/4/370

Cohen, Sheldon and Thomas A. Willis. 1985. “Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin 98:310-357.

Cohen, S., E. Frank, W.J. Doyle, D.P. Skoner, B.S. Rabin, and J.M. Gwaltney, Jr. 1998. “Types of Stressors that Increase Susceptibility to the Common Cold in Adults.” Health Psychology 17:214-223.

Dukheim, Emile. 1897. Le Suicide. Paris: Alcan.

Jolly A.M., S.Q. Muth, J.L. Wylie and J.J. Potterat JJ. 2001. “Sexual Networks and Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Tale of Two Cities.” Journal of Urban Health 78(3):433-445.

Potterat J.J., S.Q. Muth, R.B. Rothenberg, H. Zimmerman-Rogers, D.L. Green, J.E. Taylor , M.S. Bonney, and H.A. White. 2002. “Sexual Network Structure as an Indicator of Epidemic Phase.” Sexually Transmitted Infections 78 Suppl 1:152-158.

Simmel, Georg. 1903. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” Pp. 409-424 in The Sociology of Georg Simmel , translated by Kurt Wolff. New York: Free Press.

Watts, Duncan. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: Norton.

Wheaton, Blair. 1985. “Models for the Stress-Buffering Functions of Coping Resources.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 26:352-365.