Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Sergeant Exam NFLST Complete Questions And Verified Answers 2025/2026, Exams of Law

Sergeant Exam NFLST Complete Questions And Verified Answers 2025/2026 14th ammendment - Correct Answer due process of law Arrest - Correct Answer intention, authority, custody Arrest warrant - Correct Answer 1. Name of the state 2. Who will execute the warrant (normally any peace officer of that state) 3. Person who will be arrested 4. Offense Committed 5. Date, time, place of occurrence 6. Name of victim 7. Description of Offense Mapp v. Ohio - Correct Answer Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court) Search Warrant Exceptions - Correct Answer Consent, warrant, exigency, vehicle inventory, incident to arrest, motor vehicle, plain view Chimel v. California (1969) - Correct Answer search is valid of a person and area under him immediate control form which he could produce a weapon or destroy evidence Carroll v. U.S. (1925) - Correct Answer movable vehicle rule

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 03/17/2025

DoctorFaith
DoctorFaith 🇺🇸

5

(5)

832 documents

1 / 23

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17

Partial preview of the text

Download Sergeant Exam NFLST Complete Questions And Verified Answers 2025/2026 and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

14th ammendment - Correct Answer due process of law Arrest - Correct Answer intention, authority, custody Arrest warrant - Correct Answer 1. Name of the state 2. Who will execute the warrant (normally any peace officer of that state) 3. Person who will be arrested 4. Offense Committed 5. Date, time, place of occurrence 6. Name of victim 7. Description of Offense Mapp v. Ohio - Correct Answer Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court) Search Warrant Exceptions - Correct Answer Consent, warrant, exigency, vehicle inventory, incident to arrest, motor vehicle, plain view Chimel v. California (1969) - Correct Answer search is valid of a person and area under him immediate control form which he could produce a weapon or destroy evidence Carroll v. U.S. (1925) - Correct Answer movable vehicle rule