Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

International Relations: State Power, Balance of Power, and International Systems, Assignments of International Relations

Selcuk University - Neba Wais Alqorni - Introduction International Relations (6,7,8)

Typology: Assignments

2018/2019

Uploaded on 01/23/2023

NEBAWAISALQORNI
NEBAWAISALQORNI 🇹🇷

135 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
State Power/Power Politics
Balance of Power
International Systems
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download International Relations: State Power, Balance of Power, and International Systems and more Assignments International Relations in PDF only on Docsity!

State Power/Power Politics Balance of Power International Systems

Key Concepts

Anarchy and self-help.

The security dilemma.

Security dilemma within a society of states.

Power Politics: whereas power is unequally

distributed, each state must provide its own

security, and whereas one state’s security is

another’s threat, states continually seek for

power to be secure.

PP includes diplomacy, alliance, BoP, War,

Peace, even IO. Primacy is Power.

Nature of GP Power Politics

Status Quo vs. Revolutionary GP’s.

Tools: national power, alliances, diplomacy.

(Classical vs. Cold War: Structural Realism

{K. Waltz})

GPs may seek concert for world domination.

GP may seek universal empire.

Former GPs may be submerged in power

structure of supplanter: Holland-England, A-

H Empire-Germany, UK-US, ?USA-China?

Balance of Power: various

meanings

Historical/descriptive assessment of power. BoP not as conscious state policy but as a function of systems equilibrium. Grotian (Liberal) Balance: enlightened self-interest makes near equilibrium a founding principle of the society of states (eg: Concert of Europe), used to limit conflict, grant compensation, and avert hegemony, eventually overcome war. Machiavellian Balance: BoP is inevitable. States only have permanent interests: maintaining the scales in their favour. BoP is inherently unstable. Immanuel Kant: reject ‘the power trap’, both as practice and as prescription.

International Systems

The type of configuration of power in a time and geographical framework. Holsti’s five IS aspects: boundary, units, interaction, norms, structure. Structure: number of GPs, nature of their power, alliances. Neo-realism (K. Waltz) makes int’l structure the key explanation of all international politics.

Types of Structure

Unipolar (tether pole). National or bloc power: Roman Empire. Multipolar (merry-go-round). National power and alliances. (1648-1814 Europe), South Asia today. Bipolar (see-saw). National power and alliance blocs. Triple Alliance {Ge, It, A-H, 1882) and Triple Entente {Eng-Fr-Rus. 1907}, and Cold War. Each has its own type of dominant security problem: challenger/assimilation; shifting alliances; escalation/zero-sum conflict

Today’s International System

Boundaries: global strong points Units: democracies vs. the rest Interaction: eco, pol, mil, cult. Structure: unipolar and multipolar mixed.

Complicating Factors

Non-state actors and intrastate wars. Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Trade blocs vs. WTO USA is not a traditional empire. It is a mixture of: primus inter pares, benevolent hegemon, globocop, and traditional GP. ‘Triumph’ of Liberalism and instant communication challenges legitimacy of national interest and possibility of limited war.