Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

LGBTQI Activism in India: Battling Colonial-Era Law Section 377, Essays (university) of Law

This document chronicles the history of section 377 of the indian penal code, a colonial-era law that prohibits consensual sex between adults of the same gender. Various attempts to decriminalize this homophobic law, starting from the early efforts in 1994 and the controversy surrounding deepa mehta's film 'fire' in 1998. The document also discusses the landmark decisions made by the delhi high court in 2009 and 2013, as well as the recent push for change with the nalsa judgement in 2014 and the ongoing constitutional bench hearing in 2018.

Typology: Essays (university)

2018/2019

Uploaded on 04/09/2019

amitsharma2009
amitsharma2009 🇮🇳

2 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is a colonial era law enacted by
the British government in India in 1861. The law prohibits ‘unnatural’ or
non peno-vaginal intercourse. Plainly put, it prohibits sex between
members of the same gender.
While most parts of the world today have woken up to the movement
for securing LGBTQI rights, which are essentially human rights to live
a happy, equal life without discrimination or hate, India continues to
outlaw homosexuality in the form of this archaic and homophobic law.
this is not the first time an attempt to decriminalise Section 377 has
been made in India
Early efforts and ‘Fire’
- While one of the first efforts to decriminalize Section 377 came about
in 1994 when AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan filed a petition,
substantial efforts to work toward decriminalization surprisingly came
into the limelight after right-wing censorship of Deepa Mehta's ‘Fire’ in
1998. The controversial film depicted homosexuality between women
in the context of a rural Indian setting.
- Several women’s’ rights groups such as Sakhi and Sangini, one of
the earliest forums for LBT (Lesbian Bisexual Transgender) in the
country, protested against the ban, bringing for the first time to public
discourse the issue of homosexuality, especially between women.
- In 2001, Naz Foundation filed the first important petition against
Section 377, challenging its constitutionality. The case was dismissed
by the Delhi High Court in 2004.
Decriminalisation – Recriminalisation
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download LGBTQI Activism in India: Battling Colonial-Era Law Section 377 and more Essays (university) Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is a colonial era law enacted by the British government in India in 1861. The law prohibits ‘unnatural’ or non peno-vaginal intercourse. Plainly put, it prohibits sex between members of the same gender.

While most parts of the world today have woken up to the movement for securing LGBTQI rights, which are essentially human rights to live a happy, equal life without discrimination or hate, India continues to outlaw homosexuality in the form of this archaic and homophobic law.

this is not the first time an attempt to decriminalise Section 377 has been made in India

Early efforts and ‘Fire’

  • While one of the first efforts to decriminalize Section 377 came about in 1994 when AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan filed a petition, substantial efforts to work toward decriminalization surprisingly came into the limelight after right-wing censorship of Deepa Mehta's ‘Fire’ in
  1. The controversial film depicted homosexuality between women in the context of a rural Indian setting.
  • Several women’s’ rights groups such as Sakhi and Sangini, one of the earliest forums for LBT (Lesbian Bisexual Transgender) in the country, protested against the ban, bringing for the first time to public discourse the issue of homosexuality, especially between women.
  • In 2001, Naz Foundation filed the first important petition against Section 377, challenging its constitutionality. The case was dismissed by the Delhi High Court in 2004.

Decriminalisation – Recriminalisation

  • Post 2004, however, the LGBTQI movement in India gained steam. By 2006, several organisations like ‘Voices Against 377’ and other LGBTQI activists joined the petition. Several affidavits were filed. The noise made by the activism forced the Supreme Court to order Delhi HC to again hear the case.
  • In a landmark decision, The Delhi HC decriminalized Section 377 in 2009, ruling that consenting intercourse between two adults was not illegal. The verdict was hailed by the LGBTQI community as well as several members of the civil society such as academicians and mental health professionals.
  • However, the verdict was challenged by Suresh Kumar Koushal, an astrologer who along with 15 other petitioners, moved the SC against the Delhi HC order.
  • Ruling in favour of Koushal, the SC dismissed the 2009 Delhi HC verdict, thus once again making unnatural sex a criminal offense. The reversal of the verdict led to widespread protests across India. LGBTQI activists observed the day as ‘Global Day of Rage’. The verdict was criticised by the Indian as well as international intellectual society and global human and LGBTQI rights groups.

Final push

  • However, in recent years, two important Supreme Court judgments have helped the anti-377 movement to get back on track.
  • In 2014, in what later came to be known as the NALSA judgement, the SC accorded the transgender community of Indian the right to be called the third gender, separate from male and female. This meant that a transgender person could now seek legal, political and economic rights and also seek remedy against discrimination.