



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Introduction: Rhetorical Précis: “Stone Soup” Précis Example , Rhetorical Analysis Body Paragraphs .
Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
On special offer
I. Introduction: Rhetorical Précis :
A. Name of author, (appositive phrase about the author to establish credibility & authority) genre, and title of work; a rhetorically accurate verb (such as “assert,” “argue,” “suggest,” “imply,” “claim,” etc.); and a THAT clause containing the major assertion (thesis statement) of the work. B. An explanation of how the author develops and/or supports the thesis, usually in chronological order. C. A statement of the author’s apparent purpose followed by and “in order” phrase. D. A description of the intended audience and the relationship the author establishes with the audience
II. Body Paragraph #1:
A. Topic sentence/transition: “(author’s last name) begins with/by...(make your claim about what strategy you see working address the purpose/prompt)” B. Specific example to support idea: provide EXPLICIT textual support woven into your comments to support your claim. Thoroughly discuss all strategies used in the beginning section, supporting with text. (Should be at least two or more complex, stylistic sentences.) C. Discussion of how examples supports idea: Connect the strategy back to your main claim/thesis/the purpose.
III. Body Paragraph #2:
A. Topic sentence/transition: “After... the author moves to...” “Building off the strategy he/she used to begin, he/she ...” Connect an idea from the last sentence of the previous paragraph to the first sentence of this paragraph showing how the strategies build upon each other. B. Provide EXPLICIT textual support woven into your comments to support your claim. Thoroughly discuss all strategies used in the middle section, supporting with text. Should be at least two or more complex, stylistic sentences. C. Discussion of how example supports idea: Connect the strategy back to your main claim/thesis/ the purpose.
IV. Last Body Paragraph:
A. Topic sentence/transition: “to close the essay/speech, (author)...” “Concluding the argument he/she ...” Connect an idea from the last sentence of the previous paragraph to the first sentence of this paragraph showing how the strategies build upon each other. B. Provide EXPLICIT textual support woven into your comments to support your claim. Thoroughly discuss all strategies used in the middle section, supporting with text. Should be at least two or more complex, stylistic sentences. C. Discussion of how example supports idea: Connect the strategy back to your main claim/thesis/ the purpose.
V. Conclusion
A. Restatement of thesis that digs deeper into the overall intended meaning of the text than the one in the introductory paragraph (Try not to begin your conclusion paragraph with “In conclusion”). B. Reflection on examples and main ideas in body paragraphs, significance of these strategies, AND how they are linked to your thesis. C. State if these were effective in conveying the claim/thesis/purpose. D. Closing thought - closing out the main purpose of the text being analyzed.
A highly structured four sentence paragraph that records the essential elements of a unit of spoken or written discourse,
including the name of the speaker/writer, the context of the delivery, the major assertion, the mode of development and/or support, the stated and/or apparent purpose, and the relationship established between the speaker/writer and
the audience. Each of the four sentences requires specific information. Be sure to use brief quotations to convey a sense of style and tone.
Name of author, appositive phrase describing author/speaker, genre, and title of work and date in parenthesis (additional publishing information in parentheses or note) a rhetorically accurate verb (such as “assert,” “argue,” “suggest,” “imply,” “claim,” etc.); and a THAT clause containing the major assertion (thesis statement) of the work.
An explanation of how the author develops and/or supports the thesis, usually in chronological order.
A statement of the author’s apparent purpose followed by an “in order” phrase.
A description of the intended audience and the relationship the author establishes with the audience.
“Stone Soup” Précis Example
Barbara Kingsolver, creator of the Bellwether Prize and an honorary PhD from DePauw University, in her essay
“Stone Soup” (1995) argues that a happy and whole family is not limited to the generic “Family of Dolls” nuclear family.
Kingsolver develops her argument through the use of various pertinent examples, both anecdotal and historical,
supplemented by thought-provoking rhetorical questions and effective references to outside literature. She writes to
abolish the irrational thinking of how a families who do not fit the traditional mold are “broken” and “failed” in order to
rectify society’s perception of these “broken homes.” Kingsolver writes for an audience of adults from as young as
twenty years of age as shown with her sophisticated yet relatable writing style for her readers.
First: Restate the thesis statement Depending on how you re-phrased the thesis, it should come first in the conclusion. When doing this, you should briefly analyze how the author or creator of the work discussed in the paper has achieved his or her intentions. Remember the conclusion is your last chance of making an impact with the paper, so it is advisable that you restate the thesis in a way that brings in sophistication or digs deeper than the one in the introduction. However, DO NOT introduce any new ideas or points when writing the conclusion.
Next: Highlight your main ideas for the analysis The conclusion should also give a short summary or short explanation of the main points that you have discussed in the essay. Instead of simply restating the key points of the paper, it is advisable that you also describe why they are important and how they are linked to your thesis. You have been discussing these ideas in the body of the essay, hence, the conclusion should only highlight a brief summary. Restatement of the key points should also involve a brief explanation of the significance of the rhetorical strategies used in the work under analysis. Don’t forget to state if these were effective in conveying the claim/thesis/purpose and why.
Finally: Closing Thought Close out the main purpose of the text being analyzed. Be thoughtful here and use a powerful clincher.
Example 1 Sample conclusion for a rhetorical analysis essay, ‘’Why Privacy Matters: Debunking the Nothing-to-Hide Argument” ‘’…Through the effective use of rhetorical tools and the mindful arrangement of this essay, Solove persuades the audience the nothing-to-hide argument is a narrow, one sided-way of conveying privacy. Solove uses his expertise in the art of rhetoric by focusing his introduction on ethically appealing to the audience. By managing rhetorical distance between himself and the audience, he builds a relationship and establishes his authority, while not portraying himself as a superior…’’
Example 2 Sample conclusion for a rhetorical analysis of ‘’The Right Stuff’’ ‘’…The major question overlooked by Suzuki’s essay- one of the logistics, is how can the schools, understaffed and overstressed, add the difficult subject of sex education to their curriculum. Admittedly, David Suzuki writes his essay at a time when education budgets were in better shape than they are today, and he certainly makes an excellent point that educators should respect their students and appeal to their interests…’’
Example 3 Sample conclusion for a Rhetorical analysis of ‘’The Other Canadians and Canada’s Future’’ ‘’…Essentially, Salloum delivers an effective argument for his original audience through his use of logic, passion, and credibility. He carries out what is fundamentally stated in his thesis. However, despite his effective use of examples, his argument would have been more effective if his logic was more developed in some areas. Also, this would have made him more credible in the eyes of current readers. For both audiences, his credibility is strong, since he is informed and presents a fair argument, considering more than one facet of the issue.