Docsity
Log inSign up
Docsity
Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips
Sell on Docsity
Sell on Docsity
Log inSign up

Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Find documents

Prepare for your exams with the study notes shared by other students like you on Docsity

Search Store documents

The best documents sold by students who completed their studies

Search through all study resources
Docsity AINEW

Summarize your documents, ask them questions, convert them into quizzes and concept maps

Explore questions

Clear up your doubts by reading the answers to questions asked by your fellow students

Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Share documents
download point icon20 Points

For each uploaded document

Answer questions
download point icon5 Points

For each given answer (max 1 per day)

All the ways to get free points
Get points immediately

Choose a premium plan with all the points you need

Study Opportunities

Choose your next study program

Get in touch with the best universities in the world. Search through thousands of universities and official partners

Community

Ask the community

Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts

University Rankings

Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users

Free resources

Our save-the-student-ebooks!

Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors

From our blog

Exams and Study
Go to the blog

qualitative research article critique guidelines, Study notes of Qualitative research

University of BathQualitative research

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE GUIDELINES. Instructions: Please critique the research article of your choice by addressing the following questions.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

doggy
doggy 🇬🇧

4.1

(25)

228 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
EDCI 6300 Introduction to Research Professor: Yan Yang, Ph.D
1
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE GUIDELINES
Instructions: Please critique the research article of your choice by addressing the following
questions. This project is worth 10 points, and 0.1 point will be deducted from the total
points for each question missed or for each wrong response to the following questions.
Writing Style
Is the article well written (concise, grammatically correct, avoids the use of jargon)?
Is it well laid out and organized?
Report Title
Is the title clear, accurate, and unambiguous?
Abstract
Does the abstract offer a clear overview of the study, including the research problem,
Sample, methodology, findings, and recommendations?
Statement of the Phenomenon of Interest
Is the Phenomenon to be studied clearly identified?
Are the phenomenon of interest and the research question consistent?
Purpose/Significance of the Study
Is the purpose of the study/research question clearly identified?
Literature Review
Has a literature review been undertaken?
Does it meet the philosophical underpinnings of the study?
Does the review of the literature fulfill its objectives?
Theoretical Framework
Has a conceptual or theoretical framework been identified?
Is the framework adequately described?
Is the framework appropriate?
Method and Philosophical Underpinnings
Has the philosophical approach been identified?
Why was this approach chosen?
Have the philosophical underpinnings of the approach been explained?
Was the research conducted by an individual or a research team?
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download qualitative research article critique guidelines and more Study notes Qualitative research in PDF only on Docsity!

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE GUIDELINES

Instructions: Please critique the research article of your choice by addressing the following questions. This project is worth 10 points, and 0.1 point will be deducted from the total points for each question missed or for each wrong response to the following questions.

Writing Style Is the article well written (concise, grammatically correct, avoids the use of jargon)? Is it well laid out and organized?

Report Title Is the title clear, accurate, and unambiguous?

Abstract Does the abstract offer a clear overview of the study, including the research problem, Sample, methodology, findings, and recommendations?

Statement of the Phenomenon of Interest Is the Phenomenon to be studied clearly identified? Are the phenomenon of interest and the research question consistent?

Purpose/Significance of the Study Is the purpose of the study/research question clearly identified?

Literature Review Has a literature review been undertaken? Does it meet the philosophical underpinnings of the study? Does the review of the literature fulfill its objectives?

Theoretical Framework Has a conceptual or theoretical framework been identified? Is the framework adequately described? Is the framework appropriate?

Method and Philosophical Underpinnings Has the philosophical approach been identified? Why was this approach chosen? Have the philosophical underpinnings of the approach been explained? Was the research conducted by an individual or a research team?

Sample Is the sampling method and sample size identified? Was it convenience or purposive sampling? Is the sampling method appropriate? Were the participants suitable for informing research? Were the demographics of the participants described?

Ethical Considerations Were the participants fully informed about the nature of the research? Was the autonomy/confidentiality of the participants guaranteed? Were the participants protected from harm? Was ethical permission granted for the study?

Data Collection/Data Analysis Are the data collection strategies described? Are the strategies to analyze the data described? Did the researcher follow the steps of the data analysis method identified? If there was a research team, was the data analysis initially conducted independently? Were outside experts consulted in the data analysis process? Were participants consulted on the interpretation of the data? Was data saturation achieved? Were quantities provided when the qualitative researcher(s) discuss quantitative matters?

Rigor Does the researcher discuss how rigor was assured? Were credibility, dependability, transferability, and goodness discussed?

Findings/Discussion Are the findings presented appropriately? Has the report been placed in the context of what was already known about the phenomenon? Has the original purpose of the study been adequately addressed?

Conclusions/Implications and Recommendations Are the importance and implications of the findings identified? Are recommendations made to suggest how the research findings can be developed?

References