

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A hypothetical case study of insider trading and corporate governance issues at monarch corporation, a pharmaceutical company developing a new cancer treatment. The ceo, paul redford, and the board of directors receive confidential information about a delay in fda approval for their drug, pretoxide, and sell their stock before the announcement to avoid losses. The bay corporation attempts a hostile takeover, but the monarch board takes steps to prevent it. This document serves as a basis for an essay question on securities law and corporate governance.
Typology: Exams
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
EXAM# _______________
GREENBERG: Business Associations, Fall 2011, Final Exam 10 of 11
Part 2 – Essay Question – Sixty (60) points
Monarch Corporation is a San Francisco based pharmaceutical drug company that is developing Pretoxide, a new treatment for cancer. The development of this drug has taken over six years, during which time Monarch has not been making any profit, due to the high cost and delay in getting Pretoxide to market. The research and development costs for Pretoxide have exceeded $25 million dollars and the prototype of the drug has been submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for approval to be sold to the general public. The decision of the FDA regarding approval is scheduled to be announced in February 2012.
Monarch is a publicly traded corporation with over $50 million in assets and over 600 shareholders of record. Paul Redford, CEO of Monarch, has just received a confidential, non- public tip from a friend in the FDA that approval of Pretoxide is going to be delayed again, by up to another 10 months. When news of this delay becomes public in February, it is likely that Monarch stock will drop in value by at least 20%, due to uncertainty about whether Pretoxide will ever be approved.
Redford shares news of the delay with the members of the Monarch Board of Directors, and notes that he plans to sell 50% of his stock holdings in the company, presently trading at $20 per share, before the February announcement to limit the losses in value the stock will incur. He and the rest of the Board proceed to sell 50% of their personal stock holdings, completing their sales by December 30, 2011.
On February 1, 2012, the FDA announces it is delaying approval of Pretoxide. The announcement does not include the fact that approval will be delayed at least 10 months―no mention of this time period, which Redford and the Monarch Board know about, is included in the public announcement.
As anticipated by Redford and the Board, the FDA announcement results in a 20% drop in the value of Monarch stock. By selling their stock before the announcement, Redford and the Monarch Board are saved from a loss of $1 million dollars for each of the 11 board members (including Redford). The same is not true, of course, for the rest of the shareholders of Monarch, who all suffer 50% losses in the value of their stock.
On February 5, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Bay Corporation announce that they are making a hostile takeover bid for control of Monarch, citing the delay in approval of Pretoxide as evidence that the Monarch Board is mismanaging the corporation. The Bay Corporation proposes to buy a controlling share in the company’s stock, installing their own experienced Board members on the Monarch Board, and promises to get Pretoxide approved without further delays. The Bay Corporation is also a pharmaceutical company, with a long and successful history of development of experimental drug treatments, and is equal in size and assets to Monarch.
The Monarch Board takes two steps in response to the Bay takeover bid. In the first step, it authorizes the deployment of a dead-hand poison pill of 12 months duration―the result of which is that even if Bay were to take control of Monarch, Bay’s new directors could not be seated on the Monarch Board for 12 months, making their promise to obtain quick approval of Pretoxide impossible to achieve. In its second step, the Monarch Board sends out a proxy notice to its shareholders setting an election date for all members of the Board, to occur in the next 60 days,
EXAM# _______________
GREENBERG: Business Associations, Fall 2011, Final Exam 11 of 11
in an effort to fill the Board with the incumbent members, which would also make it difficult for the Bay Directors to effect their takeover. The proxy notice includes the statement that the Monarch Board believes that the FDA will approve Pretoxide by June 1, 2012, a date the Board knows is false, since their inside tip revealed that the approval, if it happens, won’t be announced until mid-October 2012. Based on this proxy notice, the shareholders renew the terms of the existing Monarch Board and reject the Bay Corporation offer.
Sonia Page, one of the Directors of Monarch, feels guilty about the losses the other Monarch shareholders have suffered, and decides that she is going to blow the whistle on the conduct of Redford and the rest of the Board, herself included. She contacts the SEC and discloses the facts identified in this summary. Assume for purposes of this question that you are working as counsel for the SEC. Prepare a memo for the enforcement division of the SEC outlining what violations of the law, if any, have been committed, identify the potential defendants, summarize what defenses they may offer, and outline the likely outcome of any charges brought by the SEC. Lastly, what impact will any SEC action have on the now failed Bay Corporation takeover bid?