




























































































Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Professional project management
Typology: Study notes
1 / 211
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
EXIT
®
®
Project Management Institute
Newtown Square, Pennsylvania USA
List of Figures – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – vii
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA ix
Preface to the 2000 Edition
This document supersedes the Project Management Institute’s (PMI®) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®^ Guide) , published in 1996. The scope of the project to update the 1996 publication was to: Add new material reflecting the growth of the knowledge and practices in the field of project management by capturing those practices, tools, techniques, and other relevant items that have become generally accepted. ( Generally accepted means being applicable to most projects most of the time and having widespread consensus about their value and usefulness.) Add clarification to text and figures to make this document more beneficial to users. Correct existing errors in the predecessor document. To assist users of this document, who may be familiar with its predecessor, we have summarized the major differences here.
SECTION I
THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Chapter 1
Introduction
The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ ) is an inclusive term that describes the sum of knowledge within the profession of project management. As with other professions such as law, medicine, and accounting, the body of knowl- edge rests with the practitioners and academics that apply and advance it. The full project management body of knowledge includes knowledge of proven tra- ditional practices that are widely applied, as well as knowledge of innovative and advanced practices that have seen more limited use, and includes both published and unpublished material. This chapter defines and explains several key terms and provides an overview of the rest of the document. It includes the following major sections: 1.1 Purpose of This Guide 1.2 What Is a Project? 1.3 What Is Project Management? 1.4 Relationship to Other Management Disciplines 1.5 Related Endeavors
1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE Project management is an emerging profession. The primary purpose of this doc- ument is to identify and describe that subset of the PMBOK ®^ that is generally accepted. Generally accepted means that the knowledge and practices described are applicable to most projects most of the time, and that there is widespread consensus about their value and usefulness. Generally accepted does not mean that the knowledge and practices described are or should be applied uniformly on all projects; the project management team is always responsible for deter- mining what is appropriate for any given project. This document is also intended to provide a common lexicon within the pro- fession and practice for talking and writing about project management. Project management is a relatively young profession, and while there is substantial com- monality around what is done, there is relatively little commonality in the terms used. This document provides a basic reference for anyone interested in the profes- sion of project management. This includes, but is not limited to:
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA 3
Temporary means that every project has a definite beginning and a definite end. The end is reached when the project’s objectives have been achieved, or when it becomes clear that the project objectives will not or cannot be met, or the need for the project no longer exists and the project is terminated. Temporary does not necessarily mean short in duration; many projects last for several years. In every case, however, the duration of a project is finite; projects are not ongoing efforts. In addition, temporary does not generally apply to the product or service cre- ated by the project. Projects may often have intended and unintended social, eco- nomic, and environmental impacts that far outlast the projects themselves. Most projects are undertaken to create a lasting result. For example, a project to erect a national monument will create a result expected to last centuries. A series of projects and/or complementary projects in parallel may be required to achieve a strategic objective. The objectives of projects and operations are fundamentally different. The objective of a project is to attain the objective and close the project. The objective of an ongoing nonprojectized operation is normally to sustain the business. Proj- ects are fundamentally different because the project ceases when its declared objectives have been attained, while nonproject undertakings adopt a new set of objectives and continue to work. The temporary nature of projects may apply to other aspects of the endeavor as well: The opportunity or market window is usually temporary—most projects have a limited time frame in which to produce their product or service. The project team, as a team, seldom outlives the project—most projects are performed by a team created for the sole purpose of performing the project, and the team is disbanded when the project is complete.
Projects involve doing something that has not been done before and which is, therefore, unique. A product or service may be unique even if the category to which it belongs is large. For example, many thousands of office buildings have been developed, but each individual facility is unique—different owner, different design, different location, different contractors, and so on. The presence of repet- itive elements does not change the fundamental uniqueness of the project work. For example: A project to develop a new commercial airliner may require multiple proto- types. A project to bring a new drug to market may require thousands of doses of the drug to support clinical trials. A real estate development project may include hundreds of individual units. A development project (e.g., water and sanitation) may be implemented in five geographic areas.
Progressive elaboration is a characteristic of projects that integrates the concepts of temporary and unique. Because the product of each project is unique, the char- acteristics that distinguish the product or service must be progressively elaborated. Progressively means “proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments,”
Chapter 1—Introduction
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA 5
while elaborated means “worked out with care and detail; developed thoroughly” (1). These distinguishing characteristics will be broadly defined early in the project, and will be made more explicit and detailed as the project team develops a better and more complete understanding of the product. Progressive elaboration of product characteristics must be carefully coordinated with proper project scope definition, particularly if the project is performed under contract. When properly defined, the scope of the project—the work to be done— should remain constant even as the product characteristics are progressively elab- orated. The relationship between product scope and project scope is discussed further in the introduction to Chapter 5. The following two examples illustrate progressive elaboration in two different application areas. Example 1. Development of a chemical processing plant begins with process engineering to define the characteristics of the process. These characteristics are used to design the major processing units. This information becomes the basis for engineering design, which defines both the detail plant layout and the mechanical characteristics of the process units and ancillary facilities. All of these result in design drawings that are elaborated to produce fabrication drawings (construction isometrics). During construction, interpretations and adaptations are made as needed and subject to proper approval. This further elaboration of the character- istics is captured by as-built drawings. During test and turnover, further elaboration of the characteristics is often made in the form of final operating adjustments. Example 2. The product of an economic development project may initially be defined as: “Improve the quality of life of the lowest income residents of commu- nity X.” As the project proceeds, the products may be described more specifically as, for example: “Provide access to food and water to 500 low income residents in community X.” The next round of progressive elaboration might focus exclusively on increasing agriculture production and marketing, with provision of water deemed to be secondary priority to be initiated once the agriculture component is well under way.
1.3 WHAT IS PROJECT MANAGEMENT? Project management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet project requirements. Project management is accom- plished through the use of the processes such as: initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing. The project team manages the work of the projects, and the work typically involves: Competing demands for: scope, time, cost, risk, and quality. Stakeholders with differing needs and expectations. Identified requirements. It is important to note that many of the processes within project management are iterative in nature. This is in part due to the existence of and the necessity for progressive elaboration in a project throughout the project life cycle; i.e., the more you know about your project, the better you are able to manage it. The term project management is sometimes used to describe an organizational approach to the management of ongoing operations. This approach, more prop- erly called management by projects , treats many aspects of ongoing operations as projects to apply project management techniques to them. Although an
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA
Chapter 1—Introduction
6
storage, and ultimate disposition of project information. It consists of commu- nications planning, information distribution, performance reporting, and admin- istrative closure. Chapter 11, Project Risk Management , describes the processes concerned with identifying, analyzing, and responding to project risk. It consists of risk man- agement planning, risk identification, qualitative risk analysis, quantitative risk analysis, risk response planning, and risk monitoring and control. Chapter 12, Project Procurement Management , describes the processes required to acquire goods and services from outside the performing organization. It consists of procurement planning, solicitation planning, solicitation, source selec- tion, contract administration, and contract closeout.
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA
Chapter 1—Introduction
8
Figure 1–1. Overview of Project Management Knowledge Areas and Project Management Processes
Project Plan Development Project Plan Execution Integrated Change Control
Project Integration Management Initiation Scope Planning Scope Definition Scope Verification Scope Change Control
Project Scope Management Activity Definition Activity Sequencing Activity Duration Estimating Schedule Development Schedule Control
Project Time Management
Resource Planning Cost Estimating Cost Budgeting Cost Control
Project Cost Management
Communications Planning Information Distribution Performance Reporting Administrative Closure
Project Communications Management
Quality Planning Quality Assurance Quality Control
Project Quality Management
Risk Management Planning Risk Identification Qualitative Risk Analysis Quantitative Risk Analysis Risk Response Planning Risk Monitoring and Control
Project Risk Management
Organizational Planning Staff Acquisition Team Development
Project Human Resource Management
Procurement Planning Solicitation Planning Solicitation Source Selection Contract Administration Contract Closeout
Project Procurement Management
Figure 1
1.4 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER MANAGEMENT DISCIPLINES Much of the knowledge needed to manage projects is unique to project manage- ment (e.g., critical path analysis and work breakdown structures). However, the PMBOK®^ does overlap other management disciplines, as illustrated in Figure 1-. General management encompasses planning, organizing, staffing, executing, and controlling the operations of an ongoing enterprise. General management also includes supporting disciplines such as law, strategic planning, logistics, and human resources management. The PMBOK®^ overlaps or modifies general management in many areas—organizational behavior, financial forecasting, and planning tech- niques, to name just a few. Section 2.4 provides a more detailed discussion of gen- eral management. Application areas are categories of projects that have common elements signif- icant in such projects, but are not needed or present in all projects. Application areas are usually defined in terms of: Functional departments and supporting disciplines, such as legal, production and inventory management, marketing, logistics and personnel. Technical elements, such as software development, pharmaceuticals, water and sanitation engineering, or construction engineering. Management specializations, such as government contracting, community development, or new product development. Industry groups, such as automotive, chemicals, agriculture, or financial services. Appendix E includes a more detailed discussion of project management appli- cation areas.
Chapter 1—Introduction
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA 9
Figure 1–2. Relationship of Project Management to Other Management Disciplines
This figure is a conceptual view of these relationships. The overlaps shown are not proportional.
Application Area Knowledge and Practice
General Management Knowledge and Practice
The Project Management Body of Knowledge
Generally Accepted Project Management Knowledge and Practice
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA 11
Chapter 2
The Project Management
Context
Projects and project management operate in an environment broader than that of the project itself. The project management team must understand this broader context—managing the day-to-day activities of the project is necessary for success but not sufficient. This chapter describes key aspects of the project management context not covered elsewhere in this document. The topics included here are: 2.1 Project Phases and the Project Life Cycle 2.2 Project Stakeholders 2.3 Organizational Influences 2.4 Key General Management Skills 2.5 Social-Economic-Environmental Influences
2.1 PROJECT PHASES AND THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE Because projects are unique undertakings, they involve a degree of uncertainty. Organizations performing projects will usually divide each project into several project phases to improve management control and provide for links to the ongoing operations of the performing organization. Collectively, the project phases are known as the project life cycle.
Each project phase is marked by completion of one or more deliverables. A deliv- erable is a tangible, verifiable work product such as a feasibility study, a detail design, or a working prototype. The deliverables, and hence the phases, are part of a generally sequential logic designed to ensure proper definition of the product of the project. The conclusion of a project phase is generally marked by a review of both key deliverables and project performance to date, to a) determine if the project should continue into its next phase and b) detect and correct errors cost effectively. These phase-end reviews are often called phase exits , stage gates , or kill points.
Each project phase normally includes a set of defined deliverables designed to establish the desired level of management control. The majority of these items are related to the primary phase deliverable, and the phases typically take their names from these items: requirements, design, build, test, startup, turnover, and others, as appropriate. Several representative project life cycles are described in Section 2.1.3.
The project life cycle serves to define the beginning and the end of a project. For example, when an organization identifies an opportunity to which it would like to respond, it will often authorize a needs assessment and/or a feasibility study to decide if it should undertake a project. The project life-cycle definition will determine whether the feasibility study is treated as the first project phase or as a separate, standalone project. The project life-cycle definition will also determine which transitional actions at the beginning and the end of the project are included and which are not. In this manner, the project life-cycle definition can be used to link the project to the ongoing operations of the performing organization. The phase sequence defined by most project life cycles generally involves some form of technology transfer or handoff such as requirements to design, construc- tion to operations, or design to manufacturing. Deliverables from the preceding phase are usually approved before work starts on the next phase. However, a sub- sequent phase is sometimes begun prior to approval of the previous phase deliv- erables when the risks involved are deemed acceptable. This practice of overlapping phases is often called fast tracking. Project life cycles generally define: What technical work should be done in each phase (e.g., is the work of the architect part of the definition phase or part of the execution phase?). Who should be involved in each phase (e.g., implementers who need to be involved with requirements and design). Project life-cycle descriptions may be very general or very detailed. Highly detailed descriptions may have numerous forms, charts, and checklists to provide structure and consistency. Such detailed approaches are often called project man- agement methodologies. Most project life-cycle descriptions share a number of common characteristics: Cost and staffing levels are low at the start, higher toward the end, and drop rapidly as the project draws to a conclusion. This pattern is illustrated in Figure 2-. The probability of successfully completing the project is lowest, and hence risk and uncertainty are highest, at the start of the project. The probability of suc- cessful completion generally gets progressively higher as the project continues. The ability of the stakeholders to influence the final characteristics of the project’s product and the final cost of the project is highest at the start and gets progressively lower as the project continues. A major contributor to this phenomenon is that the cost of changes and error correction generally increases as the project continues. Care should be taken to distinguish the project life cycle from the product life cycle. For example, a project undertaken to bring a new desktop computer to market is but one phase or stage of the product life cycle.
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK ®^ Guide) 2000 Edition ©2000 Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA
Chapter 2—The Project Management Context
12