










Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
This lecture note is part of Material and Structures course. It was provided by Prof. Aparijita Singh at Andhra University. It includes: Plane, Stress, Configurations, Models, Stretching, Shearing, Slab, Displacement, Temperature, Stress, Magnitude, Equilibrium, Orthotropic, Isotropic
Typology: Exercises
1 / 18
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Figure 6.1 This deals with stretching and shearing of thin slabs.
Representation of Generic Thin Slab
The body has dimensions such that
h << a, b
Key
where are limits to “<<“???
We’ll
consider later)
displacement (and temperature) with respect to y Thus, the plate is thin enough such that there is no variation of
3 (z).
Figure 6.2 magnitude). Furthermore, stresses in the z-direction are zero (small order of
Representation of Cross-Section of Thin Slab
Stress-Strain
(fully anisotropic)
Primary
(in-plane) strains 1
− ν
12 σ 2^
− η
16 (^) σ 6
ε 2^
=
2
− ν
21
σ 1
σ 2^
− η
26 (^) σ 6
−η
61
σ 1
− η
62 σ 2^
σ 6
Invert
to get:
σ αβ
αβσγ
ε σγ
Secondary
(out-of-plane) strains
(they exist, but they are not a
primary
part of the problem)
− ν
31 σ 1
− ν
32
σ 2
− η
36
σ 6
− η
41
σ 1
− η
42
σ 2
− η
46
σ 6
−η
51
σ 1
− η
52
σ 2
− η
56
σ 6
Note
: can reduce these for orthotropic, isotropic
(etc.) as before.
Strain - Displacement
Primary
ε 11
=
u 1
y 1
ε 22
=
u 2
y 2
ε 12
=
∂ u 1 + ∂ u 2
y 2
y 1 (^)
This further implies from above
(since
y 3
No in-plane variation
u 3
y α
but this is not exactly true
are, in actuality, triaxial ( Why? This is an idealized model and thus an approximation. There
σ zz , etc.) stresses that we ignore here as
being
small
relative to the in-plane stresses!
(we will return to try to define “small”)
Final note
: for an orthotropic material, write the tensorial
stress-strain equation as:
2-D plane stress
σ
αβ
ε σγ
(
,
,
α β , σ , γ =
1 2)
αβσγ ∗
There is
not
a 1-to-1 correspondence between the 3-D E
mnpq
and
the 2-D E
αβσγ
. The effect of
ε 33
must be incorporated since
ε 33
does
not appear in these equations by using the (
σ 33
= 0) equation.
This gives:
ε 33
= f(
ε αβ )
the case of plane stress in place of engineering notation: Also, particularly in composites, another “notation” will be used in
subscript
x = 1 = L (longitudinal)…along major axis
change
y = 2 = T (transverse)…along minor axis
This deals with long prismatic bodies:
Key
again: where are limits to “>>”??? … we’ll
consider later)
x - y plane (none in z) and do Since the body is basically “infinite” along z, the important loads are in the
not
change with z:
y 3
z
rigid body movement): This implies there is no gradient in displacement along z, so (excluding
u 3 = w = 0
Equations of elasticity become:
Equilibrium:
Primary
∂σ
11
∂σ
21
1 f
=
∂ y 1 ∂ y 2 ∂σ
12
∂σ
22
f 2
=
∂ y 1 ∂ y 2
Unit 6 - p. 11
Secondary
∂σ
13
∂σ
23
f 3
=
∂ y 1 ∂ y 2 σ
13
and
σ 23
exist but do not enter into
primary
consideration
Strain - Displacement
ε 11
=
u 1
y 1
ε 22
=
u 2
y 2
ε 12
=
∂ u 1 + ∂ u 2
y 2
y 1 (^)
Assumptions
w
give:
y 3
ε 13
ε 23
ε 33
Plane strain
Plane Stress
Eliminate Plane Strain
σ 33
from eq.
Set by using
σ 33
σ
ε
eq. and expressing
σ 33
in terms of
ε αβ
Eliminate
ε 33
from eq. set
by using
σ 33
= 0
σ
ε eq.
and expressing
ε 33
in
terms of
ε αβ
Note:
σ 33
ε 33,
u 3
Variable(s):Secondary
ε αβ
, σ αβ , u
α
ε αβ
, σ αβ , u
α
Variables:Primary
ε i
= 0
σ i = 0
Assumptions:Resulting
σ αβ
only
y 3 = 0
σ 33
<<
σ αβ
Loading:
length (y
3 ) >> in-plane
dimensions (y
1 , y
2 (^) )
thickness (y
3 ) << in-plane
dimensions (y
1 , y
2 )
Geometry:
Figure 6.4 Plane Stress:
Pressure vessel (fuselage, space habitat) Skin
(10 ksi) in order of 70 MPa
p o ≈
70 kPa (~ 10 psi for living environment)
⇒ σ
zz
<<
σ
xx
, σ
yy
, σ
xy
Fall, 2002
but…when do these apply???
Depends on
loading
geometry
material and its response
issues of scale
how “good” do I need the answer
what are we looking for (deflection, failure, etc.)
We’ve talked about the first two, let’s look a little at each of the last three:
--> Material and its response
magnitude of “primary” / “secondary” factorsElastic response and coupling changes importance /
Key
: are “primary” dominating the response?)
--> Issues of scale
What am I using the answer for? at what level?
Example
--overall deflection or reactions in legs are not: standing on table dependent on way I stand (tip toe or flat foot)
model of top of table as plate in
bending is sufficient
--stresses under my foot
very
sensitive to
specifics
(if table top is foam, the way I stand
will determine whether or not I
crush the foam)
--> How “good” do I need the answer?
design, need “exact” numbersIn preliminary design, need “ballpark” estimate; in final
longer in plane stressExample: as thickness increases when is a plate no