Docsity
Log inSign up
Docsity
Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips
Sell on Docsity
Sell on Docsity
Log inSign up

Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Find documents

Prepare for your exams with the study notes shared by other students like you on Docsity

Search Store documents

The best documents sold by students who completed their studies

Search through all study resources
Docsity AINEW

Summarize your documents, ask them questions, convert them into quizzes and concept maps

Explore questions

Clear up your doubts by reading the answers to questions asked by your fellow students

Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Share documents
download point icon20 Points

For each uploaded document

Answer questions
download point icon5 Points

For each given answer (max 1 per day)

All the ways to get free points
Get points immediately

Choose a premium plan with all the points you need

Study Opportunities

Choose your next study program

Get in touch with the best universities in the world. Search through thousands of universities and official partners

Community

Ask the community

Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts

University Rankings

Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users

Free resources

Our save-the-student-ebooks!

Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors

From our blog

Exams and Study
Go to the blog

Plaint and Written statement, Study notes of Law

Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur UniversityLaw

The document clears the concept of the plaint by plaintiff and the written statement filed by the defendant.

Typology: Study notes

2019/2020
On special offer
30 Points
Discount

Limited-time offer

Uploaded on 09/22/2020

amol-mendhe
amol-mendhe 🇮🇳

4.5

(2)

1 document

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Study Materials
Unit-III
Topic: Plaint and written statement
(Sample)
Plaint for recovery of money and
written statement in reply of that plaint
Plaint
IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :
CITY CIVIL COURT : AT HYDERABAD.
O.S. No. of 2007
Mr. Rama Rao
S/o……………….. Aged …. Years
Occ: ………….
R/o. Hyderabad .................................... Plaintiff
Vs
Mr. Appa Rao
S/o………………………, Aged …. Years,
Occ:…………….
R/o.Hyderabad ................................... Defendant
PLAINT FILED UNDER SECTION 26 READ WITH ORDER VII OF CPC
III. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:
pf3
pf4
pf5
Discount

On special offer

Partial preview of the text

Download Plaint and Written statement and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Study Materials

Unit-III

Topic: Plaint and written statement

(Sample)

Plaint for recovery of money and

written statement in reply of that plaint

Plaint IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : CITY CIVIL COURT : AT HYDERABAD. O.S. No. of 2007 Mr. Rama Rao S/o……………….. Aged …. Years Occ: …………. R/o. Hyderabad .................................... Plaintiff Vs Mr. Appa Rao S/o………………………, Aged …. Years, Occ:……………. R/o.Hyderabad ................................... Defendant PLAINT FILED UNDER SECTION 26 READ WITH ORDER VII OF CPC III. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:

  1. It is submitted that the Defendant having an acquaintance with the plaintiff approached him and requested to advance a hand loan of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand Rupees only) to meet his son’s education needs. The Defendant also proposed to execute a Promissory Note for the said amount and with a simple interest @ 18% p.a. Due to that acquaintance, the Plaintiff agreed for the same and thus, the defendant has borrowed a sum of Rs.25,000/- as hand loan on 1st January, 2005 from the Plaintiff at the Plaintiff’s home situated at Hyderabad and executed a Promissory Note for the said amount in favour of the Plaintiff and promised to repay the said hand loan within a period of 2 years from the date of execution of the promissory note. It is respectfully submitted that in spite of repeated oral demands made by the Plaintiff, the Defendant did not bother to repay the said hand Loan amount.
  2. The Plaintiff having vexed with the conduct of the Defendant avoiding the repayment, got issued a legal notice to the Defendant on 1st January, 2007 through his Counsel by way of Regd Post with Ack. Due as well as UCP, to his Residence. The Defendant received the same but did not reply.
    1. The Plaintiff submits that the Defendant having borrowed the amount of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) as hand loan and having executed the promissory not is bound to repay the same to the Plaintiff who is entitled for interest on the suit amount from the date of demand i.e. 1st January, 2007 till realisation @ 18% p.a. As the Defendant is avoiding payment, the Plaintiff has left with no option except to approach this Hon’ble Court by way of this suit. In view of the above said facts, the Plaintiff is entitled to sue the defendant.
    2. The Plaintiff submits that The Defendant is liable to pay the following outstanding amount: (i) Promissory Note Amount : 25,000.00 (ii) Interest on 25,000 @ 18% p.a. From 01.01.2005 as on date filing of the suit : 9,000.00 --------------- 34,000.00 ---------------- Therefore, the Defendant has to pay a total sum of Rs.34,000/- (Rupees Thirty Four Thousands Only) to the Plaintiff as on the date of filing of the present suit. Hence, this suit. IV. CAUSE OF ACTION : The cause of action for the suit arose on 01.01.2005 when the Defendant borrowed the amount and executed pro-note and on 01.01.2007 when the Plaintiff got issued a legal notice to Defendant calling upon defendant to repay the amount and still subsists.

Mr.Rama Rao, S/o……………….. Aged …. Years Occ: …………. R/o.Hyderabad Plaintiff Vs Mr.Appa Rao, S/o………………………, Aged …. Years, Occ:……………. R/o.Hyderabad Defendant WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANT UNDER ORDER VIII, RL.1, C.P.C.

  1. It is submitted that the defendant has gone through the averments made in the plaint and affidavit filed in support of the plaint. The averments, which are not specifically admitted, are denied. The Plaintiff is put to strict proof of the same. Most of the averments are not correct and false and the suit is not maintainable.
  2. In reply to Para III (1) of the plaint, it is submitted that I have no acquaintance with the plaintiff and did not approach at any point of time for hand loan to meet my son’s education and executed promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. I have sufficient means to support my family. Hence, there is no question of taking hand loan from the plaintiff and execution of promissory note in favour of the plaintiff.
  3. In reply to para III (2) of the plaint, it is submitted that the notice issued by the plaintiff was received by me on………….. The contents of the notice are vague and false. Since I did not approach the plaintiff for any hand loan and executed promissory note, I did not choose to reply the notice. Hence, the allegations in the notice are denied. 4 ) In reply to para III (3) of the plaint, it is submitted that I did not borrow any amount from the plaintiff and executed promissory note in favour of him. The allegation of the plaintiff is false and I need not bound to pay any amount to the plaintiff. It is not correct to say that I have borrowed a sum of Rs.25,000/- from the plaintiff and executed a promissory note in favour of him.
  1. In reply to Para III (4) of the plaint, it is submitted that since there is no amount is borrowed from the plaintiff and executed pro-note, the figures of outstanding stated in para therein is false and fabricated one.
  2. It is submitted that I have never approached the plaintiff for any amount said to have been borrowed by me and executed pro-note. Since we reside in the same street and due to rivalry between our two families regarding some disputes relating to colony problems, the plaintiff has fabricated the pro-note and filed the present suit alleging that I have borrowed a sum of Rs.25,000/- from plaintiff and executed a pro-note. The plaintiff is trying to mislead this Hon’ble Court and made false allegations in the plaint.
  3. The other allegations of the plaint which are not specifically admitted herein are denied. The plaintiff is put to strict proof of the same. Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the suit with costs. Counsel for the Defendant Defendant Verification I, Appa Rao, S/o aged about years, Occ: Employee, do hereby declare that the facts stated in paras 1 to 7 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief and I believe the same to be true and correct. Hence, verified on this the day of June, 2007 at Hyderabad. Defendant