



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The benefits and differences between peer coaching and consultation in the context of faculty development. Peer coaching involves a more didactic approach with the consultant providing feedback, while consultation focuses on reflective practice. Trust and communication are crucial in the development of healthy relationships between the coach and teacher. Peer supervision is also discussed as an effective method for instructional improvement without formal evaluation.
Typology: Slides
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Reciprocal coaching can enhance relationships of faculty as they work to gain mastery of a model of instruction Interpersonal communication skills must be sensitive to others in order for healthy relationships to be maintained
Trust levels must develop as the coach/consultant meets with the teacher The amount of sharing that goes on between teacher and coach as well as the risks taken based on interpretations of the data will influence the development of trust
When looking to improve instruction without an evaluation component, peer coaching or consultation with a peer supervisor may be an effective way to give feedback to the teacher (Kind of like reciprocal teaching can be beneficial to students because of the 1: ratio of “teacher”: performer