Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison: Tax Exemption & Commerce Clause Case, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Law

Information about the landmark supreme court case, camps newfound/owatonna v. Harrison, decided in 1997. The case revolves around camps newfound/owatonna inc., a children's church camp that challenged maine's tax exemption statute, which selectively awarded greater tax benefits to institutions serving mostly state residents while penalizing those conducting mostly interstate business. The oral argument date, decision date, issues, advocates, facts of the case, question, conclusion, and supreme court justice opinions and votes.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/13/2012

yuva
yuva 🇮🇳

5

(3)

55 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison
Docket:
94-1988
Citation:
520 U.S. 564 (1997)
Petitioner:
Camps Newfound/Owatonna
Respondent:
Harrison
Case Media
Oral Argument
Written Opinion
Abstract
Oral Argument:
Wednesday, October 9, 1996
Decision:
Monday, May 19, 1997
Issues:
Economic Activity, State Tax
Advocates
William H.
Dempsey (Argued the cause for the
petitioner)
William L. Plouffe
(Argued the cause for the
respondents)
Facts of the Case
Camps Newfound/Owatonna Inc. (Camps) operates a children's church camp in Maine and finances its
operations through a $400 per camper weekly tuition charge. The majority of its campers are out of
state children. Maine's tax scheme exempts charitable institutions incorporated in the state, and
provides a more limited tax benefit for institutions which principally benefit non-Maine residents so long
as their weekly service charge does not exceed $30 per person. Ineligible for any exemptions, Camps
challenged the constitutionality of Maine's tax exemption statute. The U.S. Supreme Court granted
certiorari following a reversal of a favorable Superior Court ruling by the Supreme Court of Maine.
Question
Did Maine's tax exemption statute violate the Commerce Clause?
Conclusion
Yes. In a 5-to-4 opinion, the Court held that Maine's tax exemption statute violated the dormant
commerce clause since it selectively awarded greater tax benefits to those institutions which served
mostly state residents, while penalizing institutions that conducted mostly interstate business. By
imposing such selective benefits on a commercial activity in which it did not directly participate, the
Court found Maine's governmental tax regulations to be an unconstitutional form of economic
protectionism favoring local consumers and business providers.
Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by
Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Economic Activity, State Tax: 5 - 4
Rehnquist
Stevens
O'Connor
Scalia
Kennedy
Souter
Thomas
Ginsburg
Breyer
Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (1997),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_94_1988/>
(last visited Monday, February 4, 2008).

Partial preview of the text

Download Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison: Tax Exemption & Commerce Clause Case and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison

Docket: 94 - 1988 Citation: 520 U.S. 564 (1997) Petitioner: Camps Newfound/Owatonna Respondent: Harrison

Case Media

• Oral Argument

• Written Opinion

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, October 9, 1996 Decision: Monday, May 19, 1997 Issues: Economic Activity, State Tax

Advocates

William H. Dempsey

(Argued the cause for the petitioner) William L. Plouffe (Argued the cause for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

Camps Newfound/Owatonna Inc. (Camps) operates a children's church camp in Maine and finances its

operations through a $400 per camper weekly tuition charge. The majority of its campers are out of

state children. Maine's tax scheme exempts charitable institutions incorporated in the state, and

provides a more limited tax benefit for institutions which principally benefit non-Maine residents so long

as their weekly service charge does not exceed $30 per person. Ineligible for any exemptions, Camps

challenged the constitutionality of Maine's tax exemption statute. The U.S. Supreme Court granted

certiorari following a reversal of a favorable Superior Court ruling by the Supreme Court of Maine.

Question

Did Maine's tax exemption statute violate the Commerce Clause?

Conclusion

Yes. In a 5-to-4 opinion, the Court held that Maine's tax exemption statute violated the dormant

commerce clause since it selectively awarded greater tax benefits to those institutions which served

mostly state residents, while penalizing institutions that conducted mostly interstate business. By

imposing such selective benefits on a commercial activity in which it did not directly participate, the

Court found Maine's governmental tax regulations to be an unconstitutional form of economic

protectionism favoring local consumers and business providers.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by

Seniority)

Sort by Ideology

(More information here)

Full Opinion: Economic Activity, State Tax: 5 - 4

Rehnquist Stevens O'Connor Scalia Kennedy Souter Thomas Ginsburg Breyer

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (1997),

available at: http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_94_1988/

(last visited Monday, February 4, 2008).