Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Organizing for Social Change within Concertive Control Systems: Member identification, Empowerment and the Masking of Discipline, Study notes of Control Systems

It will thoroughly discuss Grameen Bank, Organizational Identifications and Worker Empowerment.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

nicoth
nicoth 🇺🇸

4.3

(20)

262 documents

1 / 31

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f

Partial preview of the text

Download Organizing for Social Change within Concertive Control Systems: Member identification, Empowerment and the Masking of Discipline and more Study notes Control Systems in PDF only on Docsity!

Organizing for Social Change Within Concertive Control Systems: Member Identification, Empowerment, and the Masking of Discipline Michael J. Papa, Mohammad A. Auwal, and Arvind Singhal The Grameen (“rural”) Bank organizes grassroots micro-enterprises for productive self- employment and social change among the poorest of the poor in Bangladesh. It provides collatéral-free loans and various social services for the poor, but maintains a 99 percent loan recovery rate. Many of the bank’s more than two million members, 94 percent of whom are women, attribute their present well-being to its ameliorative qualities. Using the theory of concertive control, we gained insight into why members and workers identify so strongly witl the Grameen, how participation within this organization offers opportunities for empower- ment, and how control systems operative within the bank account for its success. This theory also enabled us to examine how member and worker identification with the Grameen influences their evaluation of the disciplinary techniques that are part of the system. By examining the Grameen’s organizational processes in terms of the theory of concertive control, we identify some of the paradoxes associated with democratic practices in organizations, and we draw insights about theory and praxis in organizing for social change. Key words: Grameen Bank, Organizational identification, Worker Empowerment Sree the end of World War TI, scholars and practitioners have proposed, critiqued, or rejected a potpourri of alternative development mechanisms to solve the reconstruction problems of subaltern societies (Adams, 1990; Banuri, 1990a, 1990b; Brundtland, 1987; Chambers, 1983, 1986; Freire, 1970/1987; Haque, 1989; Rogers, 1976; Sardar, 1992a, 1992b, 1993). Of these, the organization of small-scale participatory micro-enterprises for grassroots self-employment and self- development has received much attention by members of the development commu- nity.! Over the past twenty years, the Grameen (“rural”) Bank in Bangladesh has developed an approach to development organizing that has received acclaim worldwide. In fact, some of the Grameen Bank’s projects have been hailed as exemplars of grassroots development (Auwal, 1994a; Auwal & Singhal, 1992; Food and Agricultural Association [FAO], 1987; Fuglesang & Chandler, 1993; Hossain, 1988; 1993; Rahman, 1988). The Grameen Bank (henceforth, abbreviated as Grameen) offers an innovative approach to development organizing for, of, and by the poor (see, e.g., Auwal, in press). Grameen enables the poor, landless, and mostly illiterate people of rural Bangladesh to assist themselves, by extending them small loans, Joan utilization training, and various social services (Papa, Auwal, & Singhal, 1995). Its clients use the loans to undertake myriad microenterprises from which they earn enough income to both repay the loan in a timely manner and, thereby, alleviate their poverty. The Grameen Bank extends loans without requiring any material collateral Michael J. Papa and Aroind Singhal are Associate Professors in the School of Interpersonal Communication at Ohio University and Mohammad A. Auwal is Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at California State University at Los Angeles. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association in Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 1995. The authors would like to thank Professors James Barker, George Cheney, David Descuiner, Sue DeWine, Judith Yaross Lee, Raymie McKerrow, and Dan Modaff for their helpful comments on preliminary drafts of this paper. COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, Volume 64, September 1997