
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
nursing document for med surg nursing
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
List which articles in the review are quantitative The results section (section 3) includes all the quantitative data that was needed to be measured for this study. This includes figures 1-9. What questions led you to select these articles as quantitative? Is the prevalence of depression amongst caregivers who take care of elderly patients with dementia significantly higher than caregivers who take care of elderly patients without dementia? Are women more prone to depression than men? Does age effect the prevalence of depression? Does race effect the prevalence of depression? Are spouses more prone to depression? Does a higher workload influence the prevalence of depression? Are caregivers who take care of patients with higher care needs more prone to depression? Are caregivers of patients with higher cognitive function less prone to depression than caregivers of patients with severe dementia? Are caregivers of patients with behavioral disturbances due to dementia more prone to depression than caregivers whose patients do not have these problems? What questions will you ask when critically appraising the research review? Is there a table that describes the subjects’ demographics? Do the authors present a hypothesis? Are the outcome measures valid for the health condition you are researching? Is there an attempt to limit bias in the selection of participant groups? Are the baseline demographics between groups similar? Are there any conflicts of interests noted? Are the results presented within the paper? Do the authors acknowledge limitations in the article?