



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Notes on income and substitution effects Material Type: Notes; Class: Microeconomics 2 - Intermediate; Subject: Economics; University: Carleton University; Term: Forever 1989;
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
At various times in this course (and in microeconomics more generally), you will hear the expression ādecompose a price change into income and substitution effects.ā What is this all about?
The basic idea is as follows: when the price of some good that you consume changes, you (usually) change how much of the good you buy. Economists think that when prices change there are two major psychological effects that occur. One the one hand, a price change affects your real income, so when the price of some good goes up, you feel poorer because your purchasing power has gone down. On the other hand, price changes affect relative prices. So if the price of one good goes up, that good becomes relatively more expensive. We know you change your behavior, but the question is how much of the change is because of relative price changes, and how much is because of perceived changes in your wealth. This is what we mean by ādecomposingā the price change.
To make things concrete, suppose that you consume two general goods: clothing (x 1 ) and restaurant meals (x 2 ). Furthermore, suppose the price of clothing falls. What happens next?
The overall change in clothing (or meals) that you buy is a combination of these two effects.
How do we do this ādecomposition?ā To find how much change in demand is due to the income effect, we need to keep prices constant and identify how much your real income changes because of the change in price. To find the substitution effect we need to keep real income constant but change relative prices. Then we can āboil outā how the change in overall consumption is created by the two effects.
The key idea is that price changes cause you to make a new choice on a new in- difference curve. Call your original consumption bundle āa.ā Note that when a price falls, you will be on a higher indifference curve (unless we have a corner solution that doesnāt change ā letās assume this is not the case). Call your new consumption bundle āb.ā We now do a little ātrickā that is completely hypothetical. Suppose we go ahead with reducing the price of clothing. Next, we take away just enough of your income so that you could reach your original utility level at the new (lower) price of clothing. This exercise would produce a new hypothetical demand point: one where you have lower income, but also face lower prices. Call this new hypothetical point āc.ā Note that your actual choices are a and b ā this is what an outside observer would see as your behavior changes. But in your mind, c matters alot!
This is how we always decompose price changes: 1. Identify the overall change in demand 2. Hypothetically ācompensateā the consumer by taking away income (if a price falls) or giving more income (if a price rises), just enough so that they can reach their original utility at the new prices 3. Find the point c on this new ācompensated budget lineā 4. Decompose the overall effect.
Now letās turn to a few graphical examples. In each case the original utility is called uo, the new utility is called u^1 , and only p 1 (the price of clothing) is changing. The compensated budget line is the ādashedā line and c is the hypothetical bundle.