Navigating Cross-Cultural Relationships in the Workplace, Exams of Human Resource Management

Download Navigating Cross-Cultural Relationships in the Workplace and more Exams Human Resource Management in PDF only on Docsity!

SHRM Certified Professional CP Interpersonal

2024 Exam Review Questions and Answers

100% Pass | Graded A+

David Mungai [Date] [Course title]

SHRM Certified Professional CP

Interpersonal 2024 Exam Review

Questions and Answers 100% Pass |

Graded A+

HR Stakeholders - Answer>> External customers include those receiving or purchasing the organization's products or services and those who seek a return on their investment in the organization. Internal customers include a number of roles in the organization including Senior management, Boards of directors, Functional leaders and Employees Suppliers, Communities, political groups, religious institutions, and governments focus on shared interests Paths to Effective Work Relationships - Answer>> Strive for diversity in the range of your relationships—diversity in age, gender, background, ethnicity, and expertise. This provides an opportunity to expand your understanding of the rest of the world. Invest time and energy in developing and sustaining relationships. This means attending to others even when you have no specific needs to fulfill. You are building a resource you may need to turn to later. Develop an ease with "small talk" about non-work matters. Look for openings for conversation, such as photos or references to leisure activities. Talk about yourself without dominating the conversation. Learn to ask about others without prying into personal matters.

to intervene as a third party in a conflict, HR professionals should remember to apply thei Conflict Resolution Tactics - Answer>> Accommodate (or smooth)- The leader restores good relations by emphasizing agreement and downplaying disagreement.(Useful when there is little time to be lost and movement forward is needed. It does not, however, address the root conflict. If the group continues, the conflict will probably recur.) Assert (or force)- The leader imposes a solution. One side wins and the other loses—hence the term "win/lose" conflict resolution. (Useful in a crisis because it resolves the issue quickly; also when authority is being challenged or when the impact on future relations with the group is minimal. Like accommodation, it does not permanently address the problem.) Avoid- The leader withdraws from the situation or accepts it, leaving the conflict to be resolved by others or remain unresolved. (Useful when the conflict will resolve soon without any direct intervention or when the conflict or relationship is not worth the time investment. Leaders should be aware that avoiding conflict can weaken their role in the organization and may damage the group by leaving a problem unresolved or allowing it to be poorly resolved.) Collaborate (or confront)- The leader and those in conflict accept the fact that they disagree and look for a "third way," a new solution to the problem of the conflict. Since both sides contribute to the solution, this may be seen as "win/win" conflict resolution. (Useful when the stakes are high, relationships are important, and time allows. (It does require time and strong interpersonal skills.) There is greater chance for an enduring, equitable, mutually satisfying resolution.)

Compromise- The leader asks those in conflict to bargain— altering positions on different issues until a mutually acceptable solution is defined. The solution relies on concessions. For this reason, it is often referred to as "lose/lose" Negotiation - Answer>> a process in which two or more parties work together to reach agreement on a matter. It involves distinguishing between needs and wants. Needs are essential to a leader's goals—for example, a budget to conduct a needs analysis preliminary to designing a new policy or process. Wants are attractive but not really essential Types of negotiation - Answer>> Soft negotiators- value the relationship more than the outcome and will back down on issues in the interest of reaching agreement—even if they are no longer getting what they need. Hard negotiators- are committed to winning, even at the cost of the relationship. Principled negotiation- the negotiators aim for mutual gain, applying a process developed by Roger Fisher and William Ury called interest-based relational negotiating or integrative bargaining. Fisher and Ury emphasize the need to focus on the problem instead of personal differences and on mutually beneficial outcomes rather than hard positions. Principled negotiators can separate people from positions. They identify common interests and make them a goal of the negotiation. They are also creative: They come to the negotiation prepared with different options that may satisfy both sides. In principled negotiation, the goal is a win-win solution, requiring some sacrifice of position from each side in order to gain meaningful points.

Communication- Understanding the Audience's Needs - Answer>> Before communicating, leaders should perform some level of audience analysis:

1. Who should receive information about this topic? How many distinct groups are there? Do they have different needs?
2. What does the audience know about this topic, and how much do they need to know? Is the audience unaware of or familiar with the issue? This will affect the level at which context, supporting details, and explanation are delivered.
3. How will the audience react to the communication? -With surprise or confusion? If so, the communicator may need to slow down and pay more attention to the audience. -With resistance? If they are likely to resist, the communicator must anticipate possible objections and prepare response strategies ahead of time. Not having supporting or explanatory information at hand damages the communicator's credibility and influence. -With little interest? In this case, the communicator must find ways to increase the audience's engagement in the message—for example, by emphasizing direct effects on the audience.
4. What rhetorical (persuasive) approaches will work best with each group? -Hard, objective data? -Personal stories? -Providing the information and letting them make a decision? (This increases the audience's investment and commitment to the decision.) Constructing the Message - Answer>> Effectively framing the message requires clarity and explanation. This in turn requires:

1. Articulating the objective and desired outcome of the communication.
2. Identifying the benefit to the audience.
3. Identifying the key points of the message and sequencing them in a logical manner.
4. Providing an explanation of and evidence for each point that helps the audience see these facts in the desired frame. Impactful communicators are prepared to shorten their message to key points if the audience is rushed or bored, tailor it if the audience has more trouble understanding or accepting a certain point, or expanding the message if the audience shows great interest. global mindset - Answer>> the ability to take an international, multidimensional perspective that is inclusive of other cultures, perspectives, and views. The 4 Ts: Travel, Teams, Training, Transfers - Answer>> helps gain a global mindset HR in a Global Organization - Answer>> strategic perspective- HR must be able to balance the priorities of headquarters and subsidiaries. They must understand and appreciate their disparate businesses and identify critical success factors related to talent, which will vary considerably from Malaysian plant workers to European hospitality employees to highly trained scientists in a competitive talent environment. How should they distribute their resources? tactical perspective- the group must find a way to focus their separate disciplines and professional backgrounds to develop programs that can deliver measurable success and that can work in different cultural and sociopolitical contexts. Because of the globalization of trade and the mobility of workforces across

1. Basic assumptions. These are the culture's core beliefs about how the world is and ought to be. They may be unspoken, and members may not even be consciously aware of them. Even cultures with similar norms and values may have significantly different basic assumptions. Terms such as "success," "freedom," or "doing good" may carry very different meanings for each culture, and failure to perceive such differences is often at the root of cross-cultural miscommunication and conflicts. Cultural intelligence - Answer>> capacity to recognize, interpret, and behaviorally adapt to multicultural situations and contexts. As with the term "global mindset," the concept of "culture" here needs to be extended to embrace other diversity dimensions—age, gender, race, religion, socioeconomic background, and even intelligence and ideology. Obstacles to Achieving Cross-Cultural Understanding - Answer>> 1. Ethnocentrism and parochialism -The viewer perceives and judges other cultures according to the norms of the viewer's own culture and rigidly maintains that narrow mindset.
2. Cultural stereotypes -Perceptions of a culture are applied to all of the culture's members, often in a negative manner.
3. Cultural determinism -Culture defines behavior and therefore excuses some actions and makes changes impossible.
4. Cultural relativism -There are no absolutes. Norms and values vary by situation and cultural perspective.

Reconciling Cultural Dilemmas - Answer>> Recognize. (Create awareness of cultural differences.) Respect. (Appreciate the value of difference.) Reconcile. (Resolve differences by finding a common path.) Realize. (Implement solutions and institutionalize them in the organization.) Types of Legal Systems - Answer>> Civil law- is a system based on written codes approved by legislative bodies. In some instances, governments implement regulations to enforce laws. These regulations have the force of law. The law is applied deductively in each case, starting from the abstract rule that has been stated in the nation's civil law code. Each judicial action is bound by the letter of the law—the laws are not affected by judicial decisions. Common law- is based on legal precedent: Each case is considered in terms of how it relates to judicial decisions that have already been made. Common law evolves through judicial decisions over time. Some common laws have been codified, as in the Uniform Commercial Code in the United States, which is applied to commercial transactions. Religious law- is based on religious beliefs and conventions: a mixture of written codes and interpretations by religious scholars. Most world religions have their own bodies of laws and legal processes. For example, there are Sharia (Islam), canon law (Christianity), the Halakha (Judaism), and others.