


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Monty Python and the Quest for the Perfect Fallacy. Teacher's Guide: Sample Fallacies and Booby Traps. 1. Lewis Carroll, in Through the Looking Glass: ...
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Teacher’s Guide: Sample Fallacies and Booby Traps
Equivocates on ‘other.’ Uses the word to mean “alternate” in the first mention and “not this one” in the second mention.
Red herring. The fact that the crime was horrible doesn’t imply the defendant’s guilt.
Appeal to inappropriate authority. More commonly (in this case) known as quackery.
Genetic fallacy. The origin of your belief in God has nothing to do with whether or not God exists.
Straw man. Reducing the (very complex) theory of evolution to “elephants evolved from mice” is to create a distorted and oversimplified view of the theory.
Vagueness. Who was hopping from branch to branch singing happily?
Red herring. The fact that others have had affairs is not really relevant to whether or not Clinton ought to be blamed for having affairs.
False cause. The mere fact that more crime followed the creation of more laws does not entail that the new laws caused more crime. (Interestingly, the argument does work in one sense: Eliminating laws would reduce crime since, by definition, something is a crime only if it is against the law. So no laws would equal no crime.)
Straw man. Many who oppose a constitutional amendment banning flag burning do so for fairly sophisticated reasons (e.g., a belief in the importance of free speech even when the speech is unpopular).
Red herring. The number of people whom one talks to has nothing to do with whether or not one is guilty of reasoning fallaciously.
Appeal to inappropriate authority. It’s not clear that Coburn is an expert on lesbianism or on life in public schools.
Questionable use of statistics (unrepresentative sample). The sample is pretty unrepresentative of the general American public.
Genetic fallacy. Rejects the argument based on the fact that Ginsberg is unsavory.
Genetic fallacy. The fact that Hitler held a particular belief doesn’t make that belief wrong.
Undistributed middle. The claim is that heroin users smoke pot and you smoke pot, so you’ll be a heroin user. That’s the A is B and C is B so A is C pattern again.
Equivocation. The word “rare” has different meanings in the two sentences. The first sentence is really saying that most novels aren’t exciting. The second premise is saying that hard-to-find books are expensive to purchase.
Vagueness. The claim is unclear between three very different sorts of interpretations. (1) Individual families have a higher tax bill than they used to, or (2) Middle-class families are paying a larger percentage of the tax bill than they used to even though their individual tax bills are lower than they used to be, or (3) Middle- class families are paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes than they used to even though their total tax bills and their share of the total tax burden are lower.
Suppressed evidence. The argument leaves out the fact that Iraq is on the brink of a civil war.