


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Exam; Professor: Ireland; Class: Mathematics for Economists; Subject: economics; University: Boston College; Term: Fall 2002;
Typology: Exams
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
a) Define the Lagrangian as
L(c 1 , c 2 , λ) = ca 1 c^12 − a+ λ(I − p 1 c 1 − p 2 c 2 ). (1.1)
b) According to the Kuhn-Tucker theorem, the values c∗ 1 and c∗ 2 that solve the consumer’s problem and the associated value λ∗^ of the Lagrange multiplier must satisfy the first- order condition for c 1 ,
L 1 (c∗ 1 , c∗ 2 , λ∗) = ac∗ 1 a −^1 c∗ 21 −a− λ∗p 1 = 0, (1.2)
the first-order condition for c∗ 2 ,
L 2 (c∗ 1 , c∗ 2 , λ∗) = (1 − a)c∗ 1 a c∗− 2 a− λ∗p 2 = 0, (1.3)
the constraint, L 3 (c∗ 1 , c∗ 2 , λ∗) = I − p 1 c∗ 1 − p 2 c∗ 2 ≥ 0 , (1.4) the nonnegativity condition, λ∗^ ≥ 0 , (1.5) and the complementary slackness condition,
λ∗(I − p 1 c∗ 1 − p 2 c∗ 2 ) = 0. (1.6)
c) Begin by dividing (1.2) by (1.3) to eliminate λ∗:
ac∗ 2 (1 − a)c∗ 1
p 1 P 2
Now use this result to obtain an expression for c∗ 2 in terms of^ c∗ 1 and the model’s parameters: c∗ 2 =
μ 1 − a a
¶ μ p 1 p 2
c∗ 1.
Substitute this expression for c∗ 2 into the binding constraint to obtain
I = p 1 c∗ 1 +
μ 1 − a a
p 1 c∗ 1 =
μ 1 a
p 1 c∗ 1.
This last result yields the solution for c∗ 1 :
c∗ 1 =
aI p 1
Substitute (1.7) back into the expression for c∗ 2 to obtain the solution for c∗ 2 :
c∗ 2 =
(1 − a)I p 2
d) Equation (1.7) reveals that the consumer spends the fraction
p 1 c∗ 1 I
= a
of his or her income on good 1 and the fraction p 2 c∗ 2 I
= 1 − a
on good 2. A property of the Cobb-Douglas utility function is that it implies that these expenditure shares are constant, and equal to the exponents or weights attached to each good in the utility function itself.
2 The Maximum Principle in Discrete Time
a) Define the Hamiltonian as
H(yt, πt+1; t) = max zt βtF (yt, zt; t) + πt+1Q(yt, zt; t) subject to c ≥ G(yt, zt; t). (2.1)
b) By the Kuhn-Tucker theorem,
H(yt, πt+1; t) = max zt βtF (yt, zt; t) + πt+1Q(yt, zt; t) + λt[c − G(yt, zt; t)],
where zt satisfies the first-order condition
βtFz (yt, zt; t) + πt+1Qz(yt, zt; t) − λtGz (yt, zt; t) = 0. (2.2)
c) According to the Maximum Principle, the solution to the original dynamic optimization problem must satisfy the pair of difference equations
πt+1 −πt = −Hy(yt, πt+1; t) = −[βtFy(yt, zt; t)+πt+1Qy(yt, zt; t)−λtGy(yt, zt; t)] (2.3)
and yt+1 − yt = Hπ(yt, πt+1; t) = Q(yt, zt; t). (2.4)
Now substitute this expression for π˙(t) into (3.6) to obtain
−(ρ/φ)e−ρt[(1 − θ)q−θ^ + θαq−θα−^1 ] = −e−ρt[q^1 −θ^ − αq−θα]
or, more simply,
(ρ/φ)[(1 − θ)q−θ^ + θαq−θα−^1 ] = [q^1 −θ^ − αq−θα]. (3.8)
Equation (3.8) is the equation involving only the steady-state equilibrium price q and the model’s parameters. Although it would take some additional algebra, this equation could be used to solve for q in terms of θ, α, ρ, and φ.
4 Dynamic Programming Under Certainty: Optimal
Monetary Policy
a) The Bellman equation is
v(πt; t) = max yt −π^2 t − αy^2 t + βv(πt + ψyt; t + 1). (4.1)
b) Using the guess for v, the Bellman equation becomes
−γπ^2 t = max yt −π^2 t − αy t^2 − βγ(πt + ψyt)^2.
The first-order condition for yt is
− 2 αyt − 2 βγψ(πt + ψyt) = 0 (4.2)
and the envelope condition for πt is
− 2 γπt = − 2 πt − 2 βγ(πt + ψyt). (4.3)
c) Use the first-order condition to solve for the optimal choice for yt in terms of the inflation rate πt, the unknown constant γ, and the model’s parameters:
αyt = −βγψπt − βγψ^2 yt
(α + βγψ^2 )yt = −βγψπt or yt = −
μ βγψ α + βγψ^2
πt. (4.4)
d) Given that γ, β, α, and ψ are all positive, (4.4) reveals that the optimal value for the output gap yt is negative when inflation is positive; conversely, the optimal yt is positive when inflation is negative. The central bank finds it optimal to ”lean against the wind.”