Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Inventory Management: Finding Good Inventory Policies through Simulation and EOQ Models, Slides of Production and Operations Management

Methods for finding optimal inventory policies using simulation and eoq models. It covers the application of eoq in multi-echelon systems, coordination between echelons, and the importance of considering supplier and retailer transit times, demand data, and holding costs. The document also discusses the concept of the 'newsvendor problem' and the limitations of relying solely on average inputs.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 01/01/2013

dipal
dipal 🇮🇳

4.5

(18)

106 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Inventory Management
A&E Noise example
Methods for finding good inventory policies:
1) simulation
2) EOQ + LTD models
Using EOQ for the Distribution Game:
Multi-Echelon Systems
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Inventory Management: Finding Good Inventory Policies through Simulation and EOQ Models and more Slides Production and Operations Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Inventory Management

A&E Noise example Methods for finding good inventory policies:

  1. simulation
  2. EOQ + LTD models Using EOQ for the Distribution Game: Multi-Echelon Systems

Coordination

  • Suppose each retailer uses Q (^) Lower = 20. If all retailers order at once, the total is 60.
  • Active learning: you are the warehouse manager. Knowing the retailer order sizes, how would you pick the warehouse order size?

Data

  • Supplier to warehouse transit time: 15 days
  • Warehouse to retailer transit time: 5 days
  • Demand per retailer: 730 per year
  • Selling price: $100/unit
  • Purchase price: $70/unit
  • Supplier to warehouse order cost: $
  • Warehouse to retailer order cost: $2.
  • Warehouse holding cost: $14.70/unit/year
  • Retailer holding cost: $17.50/unit/year

Assume open 250 days / year

… To Excel

BigBluePills, Inc.

  • Expensive drug treatments
  • Perishable – last only 3 months
  • Order once every 3 months
  • Regular cost: $400 per treatment
  • If demand > order size, place rush order
  • Rush cost: $1,000 per treatment
  • Price to patient: $
  • How much should they order?

Pg. 161

Five Years of Demand Data

Average 18. Stdev 6. min 5. max 34.

Category bin Frequency <=5 5 1 6 - 10 10 3 11 - 15 15 3 16 - 20 20 5 21 - 25 25 6 26 - 30 30 1

30 1

0

1

2

3 4 5

6 7

<=5 6 - 10 11 - 1516 - 2021 - 2526 - 30> 30 Quarterly demand

Frequency

Solution 1

  • Average demand = 18, so …
    • … let’s order 18 each quarter
    • Profit = 18 × (650 – 400) = $4,
    • Right?
  • Q < D  lose? / unit
  • Q > D  lose? / unit
  • Do these cancel out on average?

The F law of Averages

When input is uncertain... output given average input may not equal the average output

Huh?

  • Average BigBluePill demand = 18
  • Profit for Q = 18 , given D = 18: $4,
  • Average profit with Q = 18: $1,
    • Less than half
  • Optimal Q = 20 , with avg. profit: $1,
  • Using avg. demand (ignoring variability)
    • Seriously overestimates profit
    • Results in a suboptimal decision

In general

Profit(AVERAGE(Demand 1 , Demand 2 , …, Demand (^) n))

AVERAGE(Profit(Demand 1 ), Profit(Demand 2 ), …, Profit(Demand (^) n ))

Simple example of the flaw of

averages:

  • A drunk on a highway
  • Random walk