
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
In this paper, students are required to explore kurt wolff's 'surrender and catch' theory, as presented in his article 'surrender and community study: the study of loma.' students must argue for or against the viability of wolff's field research model, referencing authors such as barbara ehrenreich, michael niman, georg simmel, emile durkheim, herbert blumer, and mitchell duneier, as well as the american sociological association's code of ethics. This assignment aims to demonstrate understanding of course materials and refine students' methodological approaches for their field projects.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Methodological Paper Topic Length: 4 – 6 pages typed Format: See page 5 of the syllabus Grade Standards: See page 6 of the syllabus Describe from your own perspective Kurt Wolff’s theory of “surrender and catch” as found in his article “Surrender and Community Study: The Study of Loma.” Argue whether you think Wolff’s model for doing field research is viable. You may use any field encounters you have had to date to aid your argument, but you must also reference at least one of the following authors: Barbara Ehrenreich, Michael Niman, Georg Simmel, Emile Durkheim, Herbert Blumer, Mitchell Duneier. You may also reference the American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics. This paper allows you to accomplish two goals: