Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Predicting Human Disease Mutations: An Analysis of CFTR Gene Mutations in Nine Species - P, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Computer Science

A research project aimed at evaluating methods for predicting human disease mutations, specifically focusing on the cftr gene in nine species. The team, led by dr. Mark miller, aims to classify mutations as neutral or deleterious and potentially improve on existing prediction methods using the grantham difference (gd) and grantham variation (gv) approach. Data for replacement mutations causing and not causing cf, as well as definitions and criteria for determining mutation categories.

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/30/2009

koofers-user-szk
koofers-user-szk 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Predicting Human disease
Predicting Human disease
Mutations
Mutations
Advisor:
Advisor:
Dr Mark Miller
Dr Mark Miller
Team Members:
Team Members:
Lakshmi Pillai
Lakshmi Pillai
Anusha Davuluri
Anusha Davuluri
Rajesh Kolla
Rajesh Kolla
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Predicting Human Disease Mutations: An Analysis of CFTR Gene Mutations in Nine Species - P and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Computer Science in PDF only on Docsity!

Predicting Human disease

Predicting Human disease

Mutations

Mutations

Advisor: Advisor:

Dr Mark Miller Dr Mark Miller

Team Members: Team Members:

Lakshmi Pillai Lakshmi Pillai

Anusha Davuluri Anusha Davuluri

Rajesh Kolla Rajesh Kolla

Background

Background

„ „

Project Goal: evaluate methods for

Project Goal: evaluate methods for

predicting human disease mutations

predicting human disease mutations

„ „

Classify mutations as : Neutral /

Classify mutations as : Neutral /

Deleterious

Deleterious

„ „

Possibly improve on existing prediction

Possibly improve on existing prediction

methods

methods

[

1

60]

#human

ATGCAGAGGTCGCCTCTGGAAAAGGCCAGCGTTGTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACC

#olive_baboon

ATGCAGAGGTCGCCTCTGGAAAAGGCCAGCGTTGTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACC

#macaca_mulatta

ATGCAGAGGTCGCCTCTGGAAAAGGCCAGCGTTGTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACC

#cow

ATGCAGAGGTCGCCTCTGGAAAAGGCCAGCGTCGTCTCCAAAGTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACC

#sheep

ATGCAGAGGTCGCCTCTGGAAAAGGCCAGCGTCGTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACC

#new_rabbit

ATGCAGAAGTCGCCTCTGGAGAAGGCCGGCGTCCTCTCCAAACTTTTTTTCAGCTGGACT

#mouse

ATGCAGAAGTCGCCTTTGGAGAAAGCCAGCTTTATCTCCAAACTCTTCTTCAGCTGGACC

#killifish

ATGCAGAAGTCACCGGTGGAAGATGCGAACTTCCTCTCCAGATTTGTCTTTTGGTGGATT

#salmon

ATGCAGAAGTCACCCGTGGAAGATGCAAACTTCCTCTCCAAATATTTCTTCTGGTGGACA

1

A

G

2

T

A

3

G

T

3

G

A

14

C

T

28

A

C

AGC->CGC = Serine->Arginine (109.0)

Grantham Deviation= 109.

Multiple Sequence Alignment

Sample Disease Mutation Data

AGC -> Serine GGC-> Glycine AAC-> Asparagine Serine -> Glycine (56.0) Glycine -> Asparagine (94.0) Serine -> Asparagine (65.0) Grantham Variation= 94.

Align GV

Align GV

GD (

GD (

Mathe

Mathe

et al. 2006)

et al. 2006)

„ „

Definitions : Definitions :

GD : the Grantham difference between the GD : the Grantham difference between the

‘ ‘

wild wild

type type

’ ’

and mutated AA and mutated AA

GV : maximum Grantham score observed at that GV : maximum Grantham score observed at that

site in MSA site in MSA

„ „

If GD=0, then mutation is likely neutral If GD=0, then mutation is likely neutral

„ „

If (GV > 61.3) and (0<GD<=61.3), then the mutation is If (GV > 61.3) and (0<GD<=61.3), then the mutation is

likely neutral likely neutral

„ „

If (GV=0) and (GD>0) then the mutation is likely If (GV=0) and (GD>0) then the mutation is likely

deleterious deleterious

„ „

If (0<GV<=61.3) and (GD > 0) then the mutation is If (0<GV<=61.3) and (GD > 0) then the mutation is

likely deleterious likely deleterious

Criteria

Inference

Inference

( Disease Mutations) ( Disease Mutations)

Category Category

Expected Expected

results results

Experimental Experimental

results results

Neutral Neutral

Deleterious Deleterious

Unclassified Unclassified

Inference

Inference

( Non ( Non

- -

Disease Mutations) Disease Mutations)

Category Category

Expected Expected

results results

Experimental Experimental

results results

Neutral Neutral

Deleterious Deleterious

Unclassified Unclassified

Goals from last week

Goals from last week

(1) Calculate GD, GV

values

(2) Classify mutations

based on criteria

Tasks to be done

√ √

July 18

Status

Date

Goals for next week

Goals for next week

„ „

Consider alternative approaches for

Consider alternative approaches for

GV, GD calculations

GV, GD calculations---

--- Discuss with

Discuss with

Dr Mark Miller

Dr Mark Miller