


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Notes; Class: Quantum Theory I; Subject: Physics; University: Mesa State College; Term: Fall 2008;
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Exercise: Show that Ψp(x) = Aeαx satisfies −iℏ
∂Ψp(x) ∂x = pΨp(x)
provided that α = ip/ℏ.
The wavefunction for a state with definite momentum is identical to the complex repre- sentation of a wave, eikx^ where k = 2π/λ as the wavenumber. From this it follows that the wavefunction for a particle is exactly that of a wave where the momentum and wavelength are related by
λ = h p
This is the deBroglie relationship. It is often necessary to consider function of momentum such as the kinetic energy of a particle of mass m.
K = p^2 2 m In general these will be constructed in terms of a series such as
A(p) = a 0 + a 1 p + a 2 p^2 +... =
n
anpn.
The observable associated with this is defined to be
Aˆ = a 0 + a 1 pˆ + a 2 pˆ^2 +... =
n
an xpˆ n. (IV.1.60)
The following theorem is useful.
Theorem: Consider the operator ˆxn^ where n is any integer. Then
pˆn^ |Ψ〉 ↔ (−iℏ)n^ ∂nΨ ∂xn^
Proof: To follow. •
Thus Aˆ |Ψ〉 ↔
n
an (−iℏ)n^ ∂nΨ ∂xn^
It is often useful to provide a quantum mechanical analog of a classical system. Examples include quantum mechanical descriptions of free particles and harmonic oscillators. The
task will be to use the classical description as a guide for determining the states and dynamics of the analogous quantum system. In general, any quantum mechanical system can be described in terms of energy eigen- states; these are the states that return specific energy measurement outcomes with certainty. Energy eigenstates satisfy Hˆ |φE 〉 = E |φE 〉 (IV.1.62)
where where Hˆ is the Hamiltonian operator, E denotes a possible energy measurement outcome and |φE 〉 is the state that gives outcome E with certainty when the energy of the system is measured. The importance of these lies in the fact that a general state can always be expressed as a superposition of energy eigenstates, i.e.
|Ψ〉 =
E
cE |φE 〉
where cE are complex numbers. Additionally the time evolution of a system initially in an energy eigenstate, |Ψ(0)〉 = |φE 〉 proceeds via,
|Ψ(t)〉 = Uˆ (t) |Ψ(0)〉 = Uˆ (t) |φE 〉 = e−i^ Ht/ˆ ℏ^ |φE 〉 = e−iEt/ℏ^ |φE 〉.
This can be extended to superpositions in the general fashion,
|Ψ(0)〉 =
E
cE |φE 〉 =
E
cE e−iEt/ℏ^ |φE 〉.
Thus the key step in describing quantum systems in one dimension is to determine the Hamiltonian and to find its eigenstates. This is informed by the energy for the corresponding classical system. The total energy of a particle of mass m is
p^2 2 m
where p is the particle’s momentum and V (x) is the potential energy. As for spin-1/ systems, the transition to the Hamiltonian is accomplished by replacing the physically measurable quantities x and p by observables, i.e. Hermitian operators, ˆx and ˆp. Thus
Hˆ = pˆ
2 2 m
Eq. (IV.1.62) gives an operator equation
[ pˆ^2 2 m
|φE 〉 = E |φE 〉.
In some circumstances, such as the quantum harmonic oscillator, it is possible to proceed directly from this algebraic equation and via a series of operator manipulations arrive at
Inside the well (0 6 x 6 L), the time-independent Schr¨odinger equation gives
2 m
∂^2 φE (x) ∂x^2 = EφE (x).
and the corresponding boundary conditions are
φE (0) = φE (L) = 0.
Thus the task is to solve the differential equation
∂^2 φ(x) ∂x^2
2 mE ℏ^2 φ(x)
subject to the given boundary conditions. The general solution is
φE (x) = A sin kx + B cos kx
where A and B are complex constants and k satisfies
k^2 = 2 mE ℏ^2
The first boundary condition implies
0 = φE (0) = A sin k0 + B cos k0 = B
while the second gives
0 = φE (L) = A sin kL + B cos kL = A sin kL.
the only non-trivial solutions are that
k =
nπ L
where n = 1, 2 , 3 ,.... Thus the possible energy values and states can be labeled by a discrete quantity, namely n. Substituting into Eq. (IV.1.66) gives the possible energy values
En =
n^2 π^2 ℏ^2 2 mL^2
where the index n labels the possibilities. This can be used to label the corresponding eigenstates, i.e. |φn〉 which corresponds to wavefunction
φn(x) = A sin
( (^) nπx L
The constant A may be determined by applying the normalization condition 〈φn|φn〉 = 1.
Exercise: Show that the normalization condition for any infinite well energy eigen- state implies that |A|^2 =