



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A part of lecture 5 from the eecs 598-002 nanophotonics and nanoscale fabrication course, delivered during the winter 2006 semester by p.c. Ku. The lecture focuses on the symmetries and scaling behavior of electromagnetic waves, with a particular emphasis on their applications in nanophotonics. Topics such as reflection and continuous translational symmetry, discrete translational symmetry in photonic crystals, and the relationship between the symmetry of a structure and its solution. Additionally, it discusses the scaling behavior of electromagnetic waves and how to modify a device to work with different wavelengths.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
In applications, we often have symmetry in the structures we are interested in. For example, the slab
waveguide we discussed above has reflection symmetry with respect to the center axis of the waveguide. It
also has continuous translational symmetry along the z direction. In periodic structures, we have “discrete”
translational symmetry. In photonic crystals, symmetry plays an important role of determining the dispersion
relation. In this section, we briefly discuss some of the consequences due to symmetry. We will show that
structures that exhibit the same symmetry have common properties in their solutions.
From Maxwell’s equations, we have:
2
0
r
Previously, we have studied the solution of this wave equation using its electric field counterpart. The
reason of not using the electric field equation will be explained later. But now we would like to study the
) and the solution H
We define the operator
Θ as follows.
We can easily verify that
Θ is both a linear and a Hermitian operator. That means if 1
and 2
are both
solutions of (5.1) and α and β are constants,
Θ satisfies:
( )
1 2 1 2
1 2 2 1
drH H dr H H
∫ ∫
To verify the hermicity of
Θ , we carry out the integral by parts in (5.3) as follows
3
.
( ) ( )
1 2
1 2 1 2
1 2
drH H
r
dr H H dr H H
r r
dr H H
r
∫
∫ ∫
∫
3
We use the following identity (integration by parts):
3 3
ˆ F Gd r F G nds G Fd r
Ω Γ Ω
∫ ∫ ∫
where Γ
is the surface of Ω.
where surface terms vanish because it is reasonable to assume the field vanishes at infinity.
Because
Θ is a linear Hermitian operator, it has several properties:
1 2
drH ⋅ H = 0 ∫
You can verify that if instead of magnetic fields, you use the electric field counterpart of (5.1), you get:
2
0
r
But it can be shown that the operator
is not Hermitian. Hence we will use (5.1) instead of
(5.5) in the following discussions.
We discuss two types of symmetry operations that are often encountered in the nanophotonic problems.
One is the translational symmetry and the other is the symmetry with respect to a fixed point, i.e. rotation,
inversion, and reflection symmetry. We will find the similarities between the EM waves and the electrons in
a solid state lattice.
5.1.1. Translational symmetry (Bloch’s theorem)
If the periodicity of the structure can be described by a set of unit vectors { , 1, 2,3} i
a i =
, we can expand the
inverse of the dielectric function
1
ε ( ) r
−
into a Fourier’s series as follows.
1 1
( ) ( )
iG r
G
− − ⋅
= ∑
K K
K
where G
represents a discrete set of vectors comprising of 1 2 3
G = lb + mb + nb
(l,m,n are integers and
i j ij
.) We say that i
b
is real everywhere,
1 1
− −
⎡ ⎤ = −
⎣ ⎦
is complex. Now we want to
solve for H
given by (5.6). We first expand H
in the plane-wave basis as in (2.25):
ik r
k
H r dkH k e
⋅
∫
K K
Substituting (5.6) and (5.7) into (5.1), we get:
( ) ( )
1 ( ) 2
0
1 2
0
i k G r ik r
k k
G
k k
G
dk G k k H k e dkH k e
G k G k G H k G H k
− + ⋅ ⋅
−
∑ ∫ ∫
∑
K K K K K
K
K
is real,
1 1
κ κ −
=. If we only keep terms up to
2
as:
( )
2
2 0 1 0 1
0 1
0 1
c
5.1.2. Symmetry with respect to a fixed point
Let
with respect to a fixed point, that is
. We know that if
Θ and
T have a simultaneous set of eigenfunctions. This is indeed the case for
any
T can be written in a
cos sin 0
sin cos 0
When
T is acting on a vector field F ( ) r
1 ˆ TF r ( ) RF R ( r )
−
We will discuss more details later when we discuss photonic crystals.
We know that EM waves can be classified by their wavelengths. In this section, we study the scaling
behavior of EM waves. We ask ourselves the following question. If we design a device structure that works
for infrared waves, what do we do to make it to work for visible lights? In general, if H ( ) r
is a solution to:
2
0
r r
H r H r
r
ω μ
ε
K K
If we scale the structure such that the new dielectric function is identical to the original dielectric function in
(5.20) but with its magnitude and linear dimension scaled as follows.
is a period function with a period of a. The new
dielectric function will have the dielectric constant m times bigger and with a period of a/s. If we make the
coordinate transformation in (5.20) as r ' = r / s
and use r ' r
∇ = s ∇ K K , (5.20) becomes:
2
' ' 0
r r
H sr H sr
s sr s
ω μ
ε
K K
Using (5.21) in (5.22), we get:
2
' ' 0
2
' ' 0
r r
r r
m
H sr H sr
s r s
s
H sr H sr
r m
K K
K K
We see that with the new dielectric function defined by (5.21), H ( sr ')
is a solution. That is if H ( ) r
is a
, H ( sr )
is a solution to a “scaled” problem with a dielectric function
given by