Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Symmetries & Scaling in Electromagnetic Waves: Maxwell's Equations in Nanophotonics, Study notes of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

A part of lecture 5 from the eecs 598-002 nanophotonics and nanoscale fabrication course, delivered during the winter 2006 semester by p.c. Ku. The lecture focuses on the symmetries and scaling behavior of electromagnetic waves, with a particular emphasis on their applications in nanophotonics. Topics such as reflection and continuous translational symmetry, discrete translational symmetry in photonic crystals, and the relationship between the symmetry of a structure and its solution. Additionally, it discusses the scaling behavior of electromagnetic waves and how to modify a device to work with different wavelengths.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-8wl
koofers-user-8wl 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 5 - Electromagnetic Waves IV 19
EECS 598-002 Nanophotonics and Nanoscale Fabrication Winter 2006, P.C.Ku
5. Electromagnetic Waves IV
5.1. Symmetry in EM
In applications, we often have symmetry in the structures we are interested in. For example, the slab
waveguide we discussed above has reflection symmetry with respect to the center axis of the waveguide. It
also has continuous translational symmetry along the z direction. In periodic structures, we have “discrete”
translational symmetry. In photonic crystals, symmetry plays an important role of determining the dispersion
relation. In this section, we briefly discuss some of the consequences due to symmetry. We will show that
structures that exhibit the same symmetry have common properties in their solutions.
From Maxwell’s equations, we have:
20
1
()
H
H
r
ωµ
ε
⎛⎞
∇× ∇× =
⎜⎟
⎝⎠
K
K
K (5.1)
Previously, we have studied the solution of this wave equation using its electric field counterpart. The
reason of not using the electric field equation will be explained later. But now we would like to study the
relationship between the symmetry of the structure (described by a real function ()r
ε
K) and the solution
H
K
.
We define the operator ˆ
Θ as follows.
1
ˆ()
r
ε
⎛⎞
Θ
=∇× ×
⎜⎟
⎝⎠
K (5.2)
We can easily verify that ˆ
Θ is both a linear and a Hermitian operator. That means if 1
H
K and 2
H
K are both
solutions of (5.1) and α and β are constants, ˆ
satisfies:
()
12 1 2
*
*
12 21
ˆˆˆ
()
ˆˆ
H
HHH
drH H dr H H
αβ α β
Θ +
Θ= Θ
∫∫
K
KKK
K
KKK
KK
(5.3)
To verify the hermicity of ˆ
Θ, we carry out the integral by parts in (5.3) as follows3.
() ()
*
12
*
*
12 12
*
12
1
()
11
() ()
1
()
drH H
r
dr H H dr H H
rr
dr H H
r
ε
εε
ε
⎛⎞
⋅∇× ∇×
⎜⎟
⎝⎠
⎛⎞⎛⎞
=∇×⋅ ×= ××
⎜⎟⎜⎟
⎝⎠⎝⎠
⎛⎞
=∇××
⎜⎟
⎝⎠
∫∫
KK
K
K
KK KK
KK
KK
KK
K
K
(5.4)
3 We use the following identity (integration by parts): 33
ˆ
F
Gd r F G nds G Fd r
ΩΓ
⋅∇× = × + ⋅∇×
∫∫
K
KK
K
KK
where
Γ
is the surface of .
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Symmetries & Scaling in Electromagnetic Waves: Maxwell's Equations in Nanophotonics and more Study notes Electrical and Electronics Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

5. Electromagnetic Waves IV

5.1. Symmetry in EM

In applications, we often have symmetry in the structures we are interested in. For example, the slab

waveguide we discussed above has reflection symmetry with respect to the center axis of the waveguide. It

also has continuous translational symmetry along the z direction. In periodic structures, we have “discrete”

translational symmetry. In photonic crystals, symmetry plays an important role of determining the dispersion

relation. In this section, we briefly discuss some of the consequences due to symmetry. We will show that

structures that exhibit the same symmetry have common properties in their solutions.

From Maxwell’s equations, we have:

2

0

H H

r

∇ × ∇ × =
K K
K

Previously, we have studied the solution of this wave equation using its electric field counterpart. The

reason of not using the electric field equation will be explained later. But now we would like to study the

relationship between the symmetry of the structure (described by a real function ε ( ) r

K

) and the solution H

K

We define the operator

Θ as follows.

ε( ) r

Θ = ∇ × ∇ ×
K

We can easily verify that

Θ is both a linear and a Hermitian operator. That means if 1

H
K

and 2

H
K

are both

solutions of (5.1) and α and β are constants,

Θ satisfies:

( )

1 2 1 2

1 2 2 1

H H H H

drH H dr H H

∫ ∫

K K K K
K K K K
K K

To verify the hermicity of

Θ , we carry out the integral by parts in (5.3) as follows

3

.

( ) ( )

1 2

1 2 1 2

1 2

drH H

r

dr H H dr H H

r r

dr H H

r

⋅ ∇ × ∇ ×
= ∇ × ⋅ ∇ × = ∇ × ⋅ ∇ ×
= ∇ × ∇ × ⋅

∫ ∫

K K
K
K
K K K K
K K
K K
K K
K
K

3

We use the following identity (integration by parts):

3 3

ˆ F Gd r F G nds G Fd r

Ω Γ Ω

⋅ ∇ × = − ⋅ × + ⋅ ∇ ×

∫ ∫ ∫

K K K
K K K

where Γ

is the surface of Ω.

where surface terms vanish because it is reasonable to assume the field vanishes at infinity.

Because

Θ is a linear Hermitian operator, it has several properties:

Θ has real eigenvalues --> ω is real.

  1. Solutions to (5.1) that correspond to different eigenvalues are orthogonal to each other. That is

1 2

drHH = 0 ∫

K K
K

You can verify that if instead of magnetic fields, you use the electric field counterpart of (5.1), you get:

2

0

D D

r

∇ × ∇ × =
K K
K

But it can be shown that the operator

ε( ) r

∇ × ∇ ×
K

is not Hermitian. Hence we will use (5.1) instead of

(5.5) in the following discussions.

We discuss two types of symmetry operations that are often encountered in the nanophotonic problems.

One is the translational symmetry and the other is the symmetry with respect to a fixed point, i.e. rotation,

inversion, and reflection symmetry. We will find the similarities between the EM waves and the electrons in

a solid state lattice.

5.1.1. Translational symmetry (Bloch’s theorem)

If the periodicity of the structure can be described by a set of unit vectors { , 1, 2,3} i

a i =

K

, we can expand the

inverse of the dielectric function

1

ε ( ) r

K

into a Fourier’s series as follows.

1 1

( ) ( )

iG r

G

ε r ε G e

− − ⋅

= ∑

K K

K

K
K

where G

K

represents a discrete set of vectors comprising of 1 2 3

G = lb + mb + nb

K K K K

(l,m,n are integers and

i j ij

a ⋅ b = πδ

K
K

.) We say that i

b

K

’s are the unit vectors for the reciprocal lattice. If ε ( ) r

K

is real everywhere,

1 1

ε ( G ) ε ( G )

− −

⎡ ⎤ = −

⎣ ⎦

K K

. But the following discussions hold true even when ε ( ) r

K

is complex. Now we want to

solve for H

K

in (5.1) with ε ( ) r

K

given by (5.6). We first expand H

K

in the plane-wave basis as in (2.25):

ik r

k

H r dkH k e

K K

K K
K K
K

Substituting (5.6) and (5.7) into (5.1), we get:

( ) ( )

1 ( ) 2

0

1 2

0

i k G r ik r

k k

G

k k

G

dk G k k H k e dkH k e

G k G k G H k G H k

− + ⋅ ⋅

× × + =
⇒ − × − × − + =

∑ ∫ ∫

K K K K K

K

K

K K K K K K K K K
K K K K
K K K K K K

If ε ( ) r

K

is real,

1 1

κ κ −

=. If we only keep terms up to

2

δ , we can derive the dispersion relation from (5.16)

as:

( )

2

2 0 1 0 1

0 1

0 1

c

5.1.2. Symmetry with respect to a fixed point

Let

T be a symmetry operator on ε ( ) r

K

with respect to a fixed point, that is

T ε r =ε( ) r

K K

. We know that if

T , T T 0

Θ and

T have a simultaneous set of eigenfunctions. This is indeed the case for

any

T that is a combination of rotation, inversion, and reflection symmetry on ε ( ) r

K

T can be written in a

matrix form. For example, a rotation operation along the z-axis by an angle ϕ can be written as follows.

cos sin 0

sin cos 0

R

When

T is acting on a vector field F ( ) r

K K

1 ˆ TF r ( ) RF R ( r )

K K
K K

We will discuss more details later when we discuss photonic crystals.

5.2. Scaling in EM

We know that EM waves can be classified by their wavelengths. In this section, we study the scaling

behavior of EM waves. We ask ourselves the following question. If we design a device structure that works

for infrared waves, what do we do to make it to work for visible lights? In general, if H ( ) r

K K

is a solution to:

2

0

r r

H r H r

r

ω μ

ε

∇ × ∇ × =

K K

K K
K K
K

If we scale the structure such that the new dielectric function is identical to the original dielectric function in

(5.20) but with its magnitude and linear dimension scaled as follows.

ε '( ) r = m ε( sr )

K K

where m and s are two scaling factors. For example, if ε ( ) r

K

is a period function with a period of a. The new

dielectric function will have the dielectric constant m times bigger and with a period of a/s. If we make the

coordinate transformation in (5.20) as r ' = r / s

K K

and use r ' r

∇ = s ∇ K K , (5.20) becomes:

2

' ' 0

r r

H sr H sr

s sr s

ω μ

ε

∇ × ∇ × =

K K

K K
K K
K

Using (5.21) in (5.22), we get:

2

' ' 0

2

' ' 0

r r

r r

m

H sr H sr

s r s

s

H sr H sr

r m

∇ × ∇ × =
⇒ ∇ × ∇ × =

K K

K K

K K
K K
K
K K
K K
K

We see that with the new dielectric function defined by (5.21), H ( sr ')

K
K

is a solution. That is if H ( ) r

K
K

is a

solution for a dielectric function ε ( ) r

K

, H ( sr )

K
K

is a solution to a “scaled” problem with a dielectric function

given by

m ε ( sr )

K

but with a frequency at ω s / m. For example, if we design an antireflection coating using

a periodic structure at a certain frequency ω , we can reduce the period of the structure by two times and

the same device will work at a frequency 2 ω.