Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Sociological Analysis: Evolution of Homosexuality on Religious Campuses - Study on 'Gay on, Thesis of Sociology

An issue analysis assignment written by lance morin for his intro to sociology course (ss 2800 eol 75). The author explores the evolution of homosexuality on religious campuses, using 'gay on god’s campus' by jonathan s. Coley as a case study. The article discusses how societal acceptance of homosexuality has increased in various institutions, despite initial appearances to the contrary. Morin also examines the perspectives of functionalists, conflict theorists, and symbolic interactionists on the issue of sexuality and homosexuality in society.

Typology: Thesis

2017/2018

Uploaded on 04/17/2018

lance-n-morin
lance-n-morin 🇺🇸

2 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lance Morin
Intro to Sociol (SS 2800 EOL 75)
Issue Analysis Assignment
04/05/2018
I chose to base my review/assignment on the social structure of sexuality in our current
culture. ‘Gay on God’s Campus’ is the name of the article, and it was authored by
Jonathan S. Coley. Mr. Coley is an assistant professor of sociology at Monmouth
College.
The author is answering questions about his book titled ‘Gay on God’s Campus’. In this
book he is analyzing the evolution of homosexuality on campuses that promote a
religious way of life. These campuses upon first look appear to be places where gay
students, and their supporters would stay clear of. After reading this article and
considering this issue further it is now obvious that the evolution of tolerance and
acceptance towards gay people has increased in our society in numerous institutions.
The article also mentions how our society and American culture have opened up
towards homosexuality in ways that were previously believed to never have happened.
I have experienced this change first hand and it seems to have happened so quickly. I
am unsure exactly of when, or how this change occurred. In the article it explains some
reasonings for Christian colleges acceptance of LGBT students and policies. A driving
factor that is mentioned is money. Money can have an impact on our sociological
structure. That this is easy to identify and the article offers evidence that leads you to
believe this reasoning.
Researchers recognize that sexuality continues to be an important and defining societal
position and that the way sexuality is built has a substantial effect on observations,
relations, and outcomes.
When it comes to sexuality, functionalists stress the importance of adaptable sexual
behavior to ensure matrimonial solidity and family stability. Since functionalists identify
the family unit as the most integral component in society, they maintain a strict focus on
it at all times and favor social measures that promote and ensure traditional families.
From a functionalist viewpoint, homosexuality cannot be promoted as an acceptable
substitute for heterosexuality. If this happened, procreation would eventually cease. So,
homosexuality, if occurring chiefly within the population, is dysfunctional to society.
From a conflict theory perspective, sexuality is another area in which power differences
are present and where main groups actively work to help their worldview as well as their
economic interests. We have seen the debate over the legalization of gay marriage
intensify nationwide as an example. Many gay and lesbian activists argue that legal
marriage is a fundamental right that cannot be denied based on sexual orientation and
that, historically, there already exists a precedent for changes to marriage laws. The
1960s legalization of formerly forbidden interracial marriages is one example. Conflict
theory suggests that if heterosexuals and homosexuals struggle over these social and
financial resources, there will be some degree of conflict. Symbolic interactionists focus
on the meanings associated with sexuality and with sexual orientation. They are also
interested in how thoughts of homosexuals often focus almost exclusively on the sex
lives of gays and lesbians; homosexuals, especially men, may be assumed to be
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Sociological Analysis: Evolution of Homosexuality on Religious Campuses - Study on 'Gay on and more Thesis Sociology in PDF only on Docsity!

Lance Morin Intro to Sociol (SS 2800 EOL 75) Issue Analysis Assignment 04/05/

I chose to base my review/assignment on the social structure of sexuality in our current culture. ‘Gay on God’s Campus’ is the name of the article, and it was authored by Jonathan S. Coley. Mr. Coley is an assistant professor of sociology at Monmouth College. The author is answering questions about his book titled ‘Gay on God’s Campus’. In this book he is analyzing the evolution of homosexuality on campuses that promote a religious way of life. These campuses upon first look appear to be places where gay students, and their supporters would stay clear of. After reading this article and considering this issue further it is now obvious that the evolution of tolerance and acceptance towards gay people has increased in our society in numerous institutions.

The article also mentions how our society and American culture have opened up towards homosexuality in ways that were previously believed to never have happened. I have experienced this change first hand and it seems to have happened so quickly. I am unsure exactly of when, or how this change occurred. In the article it explains some reasonings for Christian colleges acceptance of LGBT students and policies. A driving factor that is mentioned is money. Money can have an impact on our sociological structure. That this is easy to identify and the article offers evidence that leads you to believe this reasoning. Researchers recognize that sexuality continues to be an important and defining societal position and that the way sexuality is built has a substantial effect on observations, relations, and outcomes.

When it comes to sexuality, functionalists stress the importance of adaptable sexual behavior to ensure matrimonial solidity and family stability. Since functionalists identify the family unit as the most integral component in society, they maintain a strict focus on it at all times and favor social measures that promote and ensure traditional families. From a functionalist viewpoint, homosexuality cannot be promoted as an acceptable substitute for heterosexuality. If this happened, procreation would eventually cease. So, homosexuality, if occurring chiefly within the population, is dysfunctional to society. From a conflict theory perspective, sexuality is another area in which power differences are present and where main groups actively work to help their worldview as well as their economic interests. We have seen the debate over the legalization of gay marriage intensify nationwide as an example. Many gay and lesbian activists argue that legal marriage is a fundamental right that cannot be denied based on sexual orientation and that, historically, there already exists a precedent for changes to marriage laws. The 1960s legalization of formerly forbidden interracial marriages is one example. Conflict theory suggests that if heterosexuals and homosexuals struggle over these social and financial resources, there will be some degree of conflict. Symbolic interactionists focus on the meanings associated with sexuality and with sexual orientation. They are also interested in how thoughts of homosexuals often focus almost exclusively on the sex lives of gays and lesbians; homosexuals, especially men, may be assumed to be

hypersexual and, in some cases, deviant. Interactionism might also focus on the slurs used to describe homosexuals. Labels such as “queen” and “fag” are often used to demean homosexual men. Prior to 1973, the American Psychological Association defined homosexuality as an abnormal disorder. Interactionist labeling theory recognizes the impact this has made. Today, the APA cites no association between sexual orientation and psychopathology and sees homosexuality as a normal aspect of human sexuality. The current scheme used to classify individuals as either “heterosexual” or “homosexual” pits one orientation against the other. This mirrors other tyrannical schemes in our culture.