Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

introduction to research methodology, Study notes of Research Methodology

introduction to research methodology

Typology: Study notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 06/29/2025

reagan-taylor-2
reagan-taylor-2 🇺🇸

51 documents

1 / 13

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Collecting Evidence:
Quantitative Instrument Reliability
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd

Partial preview of the text

Download introduction to research methodology and more Study notes Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

Collecting Evidence:

Quantitative Instrument Reliability

Objectives

• By the end of this lesson, you will be

prepared to:

1. Discuss the types of instrument reliability.

2. Identify information provided about

reliability of quantitative measures when

appraising quantitative research studies.

Correlation Coeffficient

• An estimate that indicates the reliability of an

instrument

  • (^) +1 (perfect reliability)
  • (^) 0.80 or above is considered the lowest acceptable

for a well-developed measurement tool

  • (^) 0.70 or above acceptable for new instruments
  • (^) 0.00 (absence of reliability)

Reliability

Attribute: Type

  • (^) Stability: Test-Retest • (^) New instrument given 2 times; strong + correlations = good reliability How Determined

Attribute Type

  • (^) Equivalence: Interrater reliability How Determined
  • (^) 2 observers rate same event; strong + correlations = good reliability

Attribute Type

  • (^) Internal Consistency: Split-half How Determined
  • (^) Divide items into 2 instruments; give both halves; compare using Spearman-Brown formula.
  • (^) Internal Consistency: Kuder-Richardson (K-2R)
  • (^) Internal Consistency: Cronbach’s alpha How Determined
  • (^) (Used for dichotomous items) All items simultaneously compared via a computer to obtain single correlation. 0.000 and 1.000; a value close to +1.000 indicates a high degree of reliability.
  • (^) (Used for interval or ratio items) All items simultaneously compared to obtain single correlation. 0.7 indicates good/acceptable reliabiity; 0.9 or higher indicates excellent reliability. Attribute: Type

Appraising Quantitative Methods

  • (^) What are the concepts/variables being

measured?

  • (^) Does the data collection method fit the study

variables?

  • (^) Is there detail about the intervention and control

groups?

  • (^) What steps were taken to minimize

measurement error?

References

• Dougherty, J. (2015). Collecting evidence. In

N. A. Schmidt & J.M Brown, Evidence-based

practice for nurses: Appraisal and application

of research (

nd

Ed.), (pp. 263-288).