Lecture 24: Feature selection, multilayer networks
TTIC 31020: Introduction to Machine Learning
Instructor: Greg Shakhnarovich
TTI–Chicago
November 19, 2010
Lecture 24: Feature selection, multilayer networks TTIC 31020
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Guidelines and tips
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
University Rankings
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Our save-the-student-ebooks!
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Introduction to Machine Learning-Lecture 24-Computer Science, Lecture notes of Introduction to Machine Learning
Feature Selection, Multilayer Networks, Minimum-Residual Projection, PCA, Compression, Classification, Gaussians, Probabilistic, Linear Subspaces, Unsupervised Learning, Feature Selection, Filter Methods, Mutual Information, Max-MI Feature Selection, Filter Methods, Wrapper Methods, Neural Networks, Two-Layer Network, Feed-Forward Networks, Greg Shakhnarovich, Lecture Slides, Introduction to Machine Learning, Computer Science, Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago, United States of America.
Typology: Lecture notes
2011/2012
1 / 27
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Related documents
Partial preview of the text
Download Introduction to Machine Learning-Lecture 24-Computer Science and more Lecture notes Introduction to Machine Learning in PDF only on Docsity!
Lecture 24: Feature selection, multilayer networks
TTIC 31020: Introduction to Machine Learning
Instructor: Greg Shakhnarovich
TTI–Chicago
November 19, 2010
Review
PCA is the solution to minimum-residual projection.
Let rows of X be the data points (N × d matrix).
Construct the d × d data covariance matrix S = (^) N^1 XT^ X;
Let φ 1 ,... , φd be the orthonormal eigenvectors of S corresponding to the eigenvalues λ 1 ≥... ≥ λd.
The optimal k-dim linear subspace is given by
Φ = [φ 1 ,... , φk].
PCA and classification
A very common methodology: perform PCA on all data and learn a classifier in the low-dimensional space.
Tempting: may turn computationally infeasible into practical.
PCA and classification
A very common methodology: perform PCA on all data and learn a classifier in the low-dimensional space. Tempting: may turn computationally infeasible into practical. Careful! Direction of largest variance need not be the most discriminative direction.
−2^0 0 2 4 6 8
12
34
5 67
8
(^109) PCA subspace LDA subspace
−5^0 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Class +1 Class − Total −5^0 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
1
1.4 Class +1 Class − Total
Probabilistic PCA
Probabilistic PCA is method of fitting a constrained Gaussian (“pancake”):
λ 1... 0........
... 0........ 0... λk........ 0... 0 σ^2 .. ... 0........... 0 σ^2
ΦT
ML estimate for the noise variance σ^2 :
σ^2 =
d − k
∑^ d
j=k+
λj
Linear subspaces vs. manifolds
Linearity assumption constrains the type of subspaces we can find.
A general formulation: a hidden manifold.
One possible method: kernel PCA
Very active area of research...
Feature selection
Suppose we are considering a finite number of features (or basis functions). x = [x 1 ,... , xd]T
We are interested in selecting a subset of these features, xs 1 ,... , xsk , that lead to the best classification or regression performance.
We have already seen this:
Feature selection
Suppose we are considering a finite number of features (or basis functions). x = [x 1 ,... , xd]T
We are interested in selecting a subset of these features, xs 1 ,... , xsk , that lead to the best classification or regression performance.
We have already seen this: lasso regularization.
PCA: more like “feature generation”
- zj = φTj x is a linear combination of all x 1 ,... , xd
Mutual information
Mutual Information between the random variables X and Y is defined as the reduction in entropy (uncertaintly) of X given Y :
I(X; Y ) , H(X) − H(X|Y )
Mutual information
Mutual Information between the random variables X and Y is defined as the reduction in entropy (uncertaintly) of X given Y :
I(X; Y ) , H(X) − H(X|Y )
= −
x
p(x) log p(x) ︸︷︷︸ =P y p(x,y)
x
y
p(x, y) log p (x | y)
Mutual information
Mutual Information between the random variables X and Y is defined as the reduction in entropy (uncertaintly) of X given Y :
I(X; Y ) , H(X) − H(X|Y )
= −
x
p(x) log p(x) ︸︷︷︸ =P y p(x,y)
x
y
p(x, y) log p (x | y)
x
y
p(x, y) log p(x) +
x
y
p(x, y) log p (x | y)
x,y
p(x, y) log
p (x | y) p(x)
x,y
p(x, y) log
p (x | y) p(y) p(x)p(y)
Mutual information
Mutual Information between the random variables X and Y is defined as the reduction in entropy (uncertaintly) of X given Y :
I(X; Y ) , H(X) − H(X|Y )
= −
x
p(x) log p(x) ︸︷︷︸ =P y p(x,y)
x
y
p(x, y) log p (x | y)
x
y
p(x, y) log p(x) +
x
y
p(x, y) log p (x | y)
x,y
p(x, y) log
p (x | y) p(x)
x,y
p(x, y) log
p (x | y) p(y) p(x)p(y) = DKL (p(x, y) || p(x)p(y)).
Max-MI feature selection: classification
We can evaluate MI between class label y and a feature xj.
I(xj ; y) =
y∈Y
x
p(x, y) log
p (x | y) p(y) p(x)p(y)
This requires estimating p(y) (easy), p(xj ) and p (xj | y) (may be hard).
Sanity check: for binary classification problem, I(xj ; y) ≤ 1 for any feature xj.
Filter methods: shortcommings
How many features to include? Where to place the threshold?