

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Solutions to worksheet 1 of an introduction to logic course. It covers the concepts of argument validity, logical equivalence, and consistency, and includes examples and explanations for each. Students can use this document to check their understanding of these topics and to study for exams or quizzes.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Introduction to Logic: Worksheet 1 Solutions NB: Some questions admit of more than one solution, particularly 6 and 7. If your answer differs from that given, feel free to get in contact.
a) Is not an argument; the ‘so’ does not here indicate an conclusion, but rather that the king’s men made Humpty Dumpty into an omelette because they couldn’t but him together again. b) Is an argument, is not deductively valid (suppose no one dies in tsunamis): If God is omnipotent, he is able to prevent people from dying in tsunamis. If God is benevolent, he would try to prevent such death. God is not both omnipotent and benevolent. c) Is an argument; is deductively valid: These cookies would have been eaten unless the Cookie Monster didn't like them. These cookies haven't been eaten. The Cookie Monster does not like these cookies
a) True. An argument is valid just if it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. Such an argument may have a false conclusion, as long as the premises are not all true. b) False. An argument is sound just if it is valid and has true premises. An argument is valid just if it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A valid argument with true premises must therefore have a true conclusion. So a sound argument must have a true conclusion. c) False. An argument is valid just if it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. A valid argument with a true conclusion may therefore have false premises, and hence fail to be sound.
a) True. A pair of sentences are logically equivalent just if it is not possible for them to differ in truth value. A sentence is logically true just if it is not possible for it to be false. Hence any two logically true sentences will necessarily both be true, and so it is not possible for them to differ in truth value. b) False. A sentence is logically indeterminate just if it is neither logically true nor logically false. An argument is valid just if it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. This may be the case when the conclusion is logically indeterminate.
c) True. A sentence is logically false just if it is not possible for it to be true. If an argument has a logically false premise, it is not possible for its premises to all be true, and hence not possible for its premises to be true and its conclusion false. Hence it is valid. d) False. A set of sentences is logically consistent just if it is possible for all the members of that set to be true. A sentence is logically true just if it is not possible for it to be false. From the fact that one member of a set of sentences is logically true, it does not follow that it is possible for all members of that set to be true, and hence does not follow that the set is logically consistent.
a) The argument is valid. If the conclusion is logically equivalent to a logical truth, it is not possible for the conclusion to be false. Hence it is not possible for the argument to have true premises and a false conclusion. Hence it is valid. b) It is not possible for the premises to be true. If it was possible, it would be possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, and hence the argument would not be valid, contrary to our supposition. The set of the premises is therefore inconsistent. c) If the premises of an argument form an inconsistent set, it is not possible for them to be true. Hence it is not possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, and so the argument is valid. An argument is sound if it is valid and has true premises; as it is not possible for the premises to be true, they are not true, and so the argument is not sound.
a) E Elmo is in Fraggle Rock. ~E b) S Some Fraggle is in Sesame St. ~S c) M All Muppets are Fraggles ~M
a) ~ P & ~ Q b) P ⊃ R c) R ∨ ~ Q d) ~ (P ∨ R) e) (~ P ∨ ~ Q) ⊃ ~ R f) (~ P & ~ Q) ∨ (P & Q) g) (P ⊃ Q) ⊃ (R ⊃ P)
P Q P or Q [exclusive] T T F T F T F T T F F F